Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US must lead major aid effort in Pakistan to truly defeat 'terror'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 05:11 AM
Original message
US must lead major aid effort in Pakistan to truly defeat 'terror'
The real war on 'terror' must begin
US must lead major aid effort in Pakistan to truly defeat 'terror', says Mark LeVine


At least 20 million people have been affected by the floods (AFP)

Mark LeVine

How can we process the idea of 20 million people left homeless and six million facing immanent starvation, with little or no locally produced food available for at least the next two years? How do you quantify feeding and housing 20,000,000 people - the seven zeros make the sheer scope of the disaster far more tangible than the word "million"?

More broadly, how do you help the sixth most populous country in the world - with 170 million people - recover from a flood that literally submerged one-third of the nation under water, while, in a cruel twist of fate, leaving many without fresh drinking water?

For most of the last decade, the US and its allies have been fighting a so-called 'war on terror' in the badlands of Afghanistan and Pakistan. But today a new 'war on terror' must begin - one that demands a commitment of attention, resources, and expertise far exceeding that devoted to the now outdated war. Failing to do this will result in a rise in extremism on a potentially unparalleled scale.

Unimaginable terror

Imagine the terror felt by 20 million people living without homes, water, medicine or food. Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, has seen plenty of major disasters, but after flying across the flood-hit country he declared, visibly shaken, that he has "never seen a disaster as bad". Even as he spoke, survivors were so desperately grabbing at any relief supplies, ripping at each others' clothes and causing such a level of chaos that in some places aid distribution has had to be stopped.

This terror is not going to numb the Pakistani people into apathy or a stupor. If an unprecedented relief effort on a scale that at least equals the amount of resources devoted to the other 'war on terror' is not mounted soon, an unfathomable level of anger and desperation will develop, with consequences that are impossible to predict.

Full piece: http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2010/08/201081612554999771.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexanRudeBoy Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
We just need to stop invading and occupying Muslim lands, stop unilaterally supporting Israel's crimes, and stop propping up the most despotic regimes in the region.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. The scope of this disaster totally boggles the mind...
I'm still amazed that the entire world isn't focused on this... Doing nothing is just not an option, since the effects of what's happening here will continue to be felt for decades, and will have worldwide repercussions. Thanks for keeping us up to speed here on DU... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're welcome. Here's a bit of an update on progress (or lack thereof)....
Pakistan flood relief efforts 'stuck at 1.0'



Sep 02, 2010

One month after the floods, 20 percent of Pakistan is still under water. Yet despite the on-going need, Pakistan floods relief efforts are "stuck at 1.0," reads a recent Wired.com headline.

So far, the U.S has committed $200 million, less than half of what it gave Haiti's smaller population.

"(A) month after the Haiti earthquake the U.S. government had over 20,000 troops on the ground, $450 million in assistance money earmarked, and an innovative web-based system to let troops and aid workers collaborate like never before," http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/09/pakistan-flood-relief">writes Spencer Ackerman.

Corruption issues aside, there are other reasons for this sluggish aid response, he concedes -- getting access to flooded areas is harder than getting access to collapsed one…. Pakistan's traditional uneasiness with U.S. troops on its territory have rendered a Haiti-style ground force unfeasible."

However, given that Pakistan serves as an "inadvertent (mostly) epicenter for al-Qaeda to export terror…maybe it's time to at least bring in more APIs," Ackerman suggests.

For ways you can help Pakistan's flood victims, visit our "http://content.usatoday.com/communities/kindness/post/2010/08/how-to-help-the-victims-of-the-pakistan-floods/1">how to help" page.

From: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/kindness/post/2010/09/pakistan-flood-relief-efforts-stuck-at-10/1


Last time I was here this thread had 4 recs, I just noticed that's gone down to 1. Why on earth would anyone unrec a thread about solutions to help out our fellow human beings in need? Baffled. :shrug:


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is so tragic and the lack of news coverage isn't helping...
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 01:50 PM by Rhiannon12866
The MSM normally has boots on the ground no matter how devastating the disaster, but this is huge and ongoing, yet barely rates a mention. I know that it's dangerous, even without this natural disaster, but that didn't stop them in Iraq or Lebanon... And I often think what a difference it would have made, both here at home, repairing our crumbling infrastructure, education and funding needed social programs, and foreign aid for desperate situations like this, if we hadn't spent billions on failed wars of choice. ;(

On edit: I was the 4th rec... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC