SCHEER: Truth About Iraq Finally Has Its Pants On

Yet even in face of 9/11 commission rebuke, White House keeps dissembling on Al Qaeda links

June 22, 2004 – "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and Al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States," reports the staff of the bipartisan 9/11 commission in demolishing one of the Bush administration's main arguments for invading Iraq. Now the administration and its spinmeisters are reduced to playing cheap semantic tricks to justify one of history's great bait-and-switch operations, arguing that they never said explicitly that Iraq was collaborating with Al Qaeda to harm the U.S.

The administration was perfectly happy when more than four out of five Americans polled, as we went to war, said that they believed Saddam Hussein had something to do with the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. We are now to believe that the dozens of prominent references by President Bush and his top officials to "linkages" between Al Qaeda and Iraq were all taken out of context by a confused public.

http://www.robertscheer.com

We have no credible evidence that Iraq and Al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States.

The best way to counter lies is to disseminate the truth. As Mr. Scheer says:

The reality is that Bush and company have turned the language of lying into a fine art, always leaving themselves a shred of deniability in case the truth catches up. For example, Cheney has repeatedly cited as a smoking gun an always shaky report about 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta possibly meeting with an Iraqi official in Prague only months before the attacks, telling the nation that this sole claim to direct evidence linking Iraq with 9/11 had "been pretty well confirmed."
The 9/11 commission staff, however, begs to differ, saying Atta was in Florida.

Of course, many of us knew before the invasion that the story of the Prague meeting had been debunked. This didn't keep the junta from claiming there was a link. It worked fairly well; even recent polls shows about 70% of Americans still swallow the disinformation hook, line and sinker.

Hopefully, more Americans will now come to the realization that Bush his aides lied about WMDs and the Saddam-al Qaida link. There is no way these were innocent errors in judgment based on bad intelligence; these were deliberate, bald faced lies. Given all the information that was available to the public prior to the invasion that contradicted the junta's case for war, only a liar or a fool would have been so certain of what was being said by Bush and his neoconservative allies, both inside and outside the junta.

It's long passed time to remove these criminals from office and charge them with war crimes.

that when Bush announced on the deck of the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln that the defeated Hussein was "an ally of Al Qaeda," he didn't mean they actually helped each other. When Secretary of State Colin Powell told the United Nations that Al Qaeda was operating inside Iraq, he apparently assumed people knew that he was referring to an affiliate called Ansar al Islam that was operating in the northern "no-fly" zone patrolled by the United States and outside Hussein's control.

And when Vice President Dick Cheney said on "Meet the Press" that by attacking Iraq "we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11," he was only helpfully pointing out that Iraq is in the Middle East too.

Yeah, right.