Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No connections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bgno64 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 02:04 PM
Original message
No connections
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 02:19 PM by Bgno64
http://blogs.lancasteronline.com/smartremarks/2011/01/10/no-connections/">Smart Remarks:

Right-wing violent rhetoric in pictures:



Famously, from a Tea Party rally. But I’m sure he wasn’t really suggesting that if Democrats in our government continue to do things he didn’t like, he’d try to implement a “Second Amendment” remedy.

You know - a “Second Amendment remedy,” as Nevada Tea Party Republican Senatorial Candidate Sharron Angle defined it:

And you know, I’m hoping that we’re not getting to Second Amendment remedies. I hope the vote will be the cure for the Harry Reid problems.

Clearly she was not suggesting that if Reid wanted to crack down on guns she’d show him the business end of a firearm. Not in the least.. ...

And it’s not like these folks draw their inspiration from their media stars, like Rush Limbaugh:

I tell people don’t kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus - living fossils - s­o we we’ll never forget what these people stood for.

I mean clearly, he didn’t mean that literally.

And neither did Ann Coulter:

We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors.

It was just hyperbole! Actually, we could go on in this vein all day - your right-wing media stars have employed a lot of “hyperbole” in recent years.

But none of it could plausibly be connected to what happened Saturday.

Clearly, all of this - and the infinite number of additional examples we could cite - have had nothing to do with establishing a rhetorical political culture where violence is the continual subtext. Certainly, none of the people in these pictures, or making these statements, really mean that they want to go get guns and do violence. No, they’re just making a point.

That point being … what, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. very good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC