Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The IMF Protection Racket

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:19 AM
Original message
The IMF Protection Racket
There seems to be strong consensus - at least outside of the US and Britain - that the IMF (International Monetary Fund) is a protection racket. Here is the Wikipedia definition of protection racket:

An extortion scheme whereby a criminal group or individual coerces other less powerful entities to pay money, allegedly for protection services against external threats (usually violence or property damage). Many racketeers will coerce potential clients into buying protection through property damage or other harassment. In some cases, the racketeers do little to protect the client from other predators, and their "protection" is little more than extortion.

Another way to think of it is an offer you can't refuse. Although I didn't realize it at the time, the Mafia and protection rackets were an integral part of my childhood in Milwaukee. Back then I thought it was normal for disk jockeys to get free meals at fancy Italian restaurants (someone with Mafia credentials was repaying my father for promoting an Italian accordion player on his show). I also assumed it was normal for Italians to bury their dead in lye in back alleys and abandoned warehouses.

This is how the IMF protection scam works:


Step 1: The IMF offers you a loan (as they did Hungary in July and Ireland in November).

IMF loans come with draconian conditions - structural adjustment programs, intended to open your country to foreign corporations. There is an immediate demand for your government to slash public spending - on education, health care, social services and basic needs, such as clean drinking water. Forcing a country to privatize their public water services immediately creates a market for multinational water monopoly to move in. Likewise forcing them to privatize health services (all industrialized countries, except for the US, have national health systems) creates more favorable markets for drug and health insurance companies.

Step 2: If you refuse the loan, the ratings agencies waltz in and bankrupt your country by downgrading your credit rating.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-IMF-Protection-Racket-by-Dr-Stuart-Jeanne-B-110213-800.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. The IMF, World Bank and USAID are just the leading villians.
The S.O. and I made up a list of all the NGOs that are a danger to the economic and social security of vulnerable peoples/nations, and got to a count of 38. Were a little too tipsy to continue at that point, but there is obviously no shortage of groups that would claim to provide help while stealing your grandmother's wooden teeth and feeling up your daughter while you wait in line for a cup of rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is real important to understand...
and by the low number of recs, it appears it little understood by way too many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. The boys in the Ivory Towers
control the World.They use the military to enforce their iron fisted rules and blood letting if the weak refuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. 'Outside of the USA and Britain...'
Not sure about Britain. We were a recipient of the IMF's 'protection' in 1976; and it was one of the things that helped to usher in Thatcherism, a move away from the postwar full-employment consensus, and ultimately our dependence on the banking and finance industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC