Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ drops Defense of Rumsfield & a dozen Bush officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 04:25 PM
Original message
DOJ drops Defense of Rumsfield & a dozen Bush officials
I hope I'm reading this right.. The Justice dept just dropped Defense of Bush Officials over interrogations tactics. So they (Bush officials) or the US government have to hire private attorneys and are not represented by the US Justice dept. The only person not dropped is Robert Gates.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49998.html

The Justice Department under President Barack Obama has quietly dropped its legal representation of more than a dozen Bush-era Pentagon and administration officials - including former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and aide Paul Wolfowitz - in a lawsuit by Al Qaeda operative Jose Padilla, who spent years behind bars without charges in conditions his lawyers compare to torture.

Charles Miller, a Justice Department spokesman, confirmed Tuesday that the government has agreed to retain private lawyers for the officials, at a cost of up to $200 per hour. Miller said “conflicts concerns” prompted the decision. He did not elaborate.

One private attorney involved in the case, who asked not to be named, said the Obama administration apparently concluded “its duty to represent the defendants zealously, which includes the duty to argue any and all defenses, can’t be discharged for reasons of policy and other government interests.”

The Justice Department continues to represent only a single official, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in the suit.


Holy Cow, is this what we've been waiting for? What does this mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can they be prosecuted for war crimes now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting, I wonder what it means? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Check. Next on list: prosecute Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the case against Bush Co can go to court now
It's a private law suit against Bush & Co on illegal detention & now the US Government is not going to represent them. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. New link below-it's going to court--Game ON!!!!
http://blog.reidreport.com/2011/02/holder-unleashed-justice-drops-rumsfeld-wolfowitz-doma-defense/

excerpt:

Another potential complication: Attorney General Eric Holder signed three Supreme Court amicus briefs objecting to the Bush administration’s treatment of Padilla.

But a second case, one pulling in torture memo author John Yoo, is going forward, and likely to wind up before the Supreme Court. The Obama Justice Department had already stopped defending Yoo.


Should I do a new post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Outsourcing hypocrisy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Holy Crap!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wait? Does this mean that they are outsourcing the DOJ.
After all they are hiring private lawyers for these crooks on the public dime. How is that different than Halliburton exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Very interesting. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just out of curiosity, has anyone noticed
another series of departures and resignations (I'm not talking rank and file here) --

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2011/01/13/david-kris-resigns-from-doj/

Also mentioned, Glenn Fine, David Barron and Marty Lederman...



“Dream Team” at OLC Dismantled, as Marty Lederman Leaves Executive Branch
By: David Dayen Wednesday July 21, 2010 7:20 am

http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/21/dream-team-at-olc-dismantled-as-marty-lederman-leaves-executive-branch/

Let me go in the wayback machine to January 20, 2009, and the announcement of Marty Lederman joining the Administration in the Office of Legal Counsel:


"Lederman, another former Clinton Office of Legal Counsel lawyer, is perhaps the most prominent of several high-profile opponents of the Bush Administration’s executive power claims joining Obama, a mark that he intends not just to change but to aggressively reverse Bush’s moves on subjects like torture. With hires like Barron, Johnsen, and Lederman, Obama is not just going back to Democratic lawyers: These are anti-Bush lawyers."


Lederman has been, in particular, an early and vocal critic of torture, and has suggested Bush Administration officials have committed specific crimes in that regard.



David Dayen quipped in that piece a while back: "Maybe OLC can get outsourced to the private sector now, too."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. and it only took TWO+ YEARS!
Is this the Internet Age, or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
I like the sound of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC