Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Irradiated Zone: Don’t Go There! (Missing in the Japan Catastrophe -- Thinking the Unthinkable)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 08:57 AM
Original message
Irradiated Zone: Don’t Go There! (Missing in the Japan Catastrophe -- Thinking the Unthinkable)
from TomDispatch:




Irradiated Zone: Don’t Go There!
Missing in the Japan Catastrophe -- Thinking the Unthinkable

By Tom Engelhardt


“Seldom more than thrice annually did any layman or stranger travel the old road that passed the abbey, in spite of the oasis which permitted that abbey’s existence and which would have made the monastery a natural inn for wayfarers if the road were not a road from nowhere, leading nowhere, in terms of the modes of travel in those times. Perhaps, in earlier ages, the road had been a portion of the shortest route from the Great Salt Lake to Old El Paso; south of the abbey it intersected a similar strip of broken stone that stretched east- and westward. The crossing was worn by time, but not by Man, of late.”


I traveled that “old road” when it was still relatively new and heavily trafficked, and I was already a grown-up. I also traveled it when I was a teenager -- the version with “broken stone” -- through the blistered backlands of what had once been the American West, coming upon the “sports,” the mutants, “the misborn” who, in those grim lands, sometimes looked upon human stragglers “as a dependable source of venison.”

And if you’re now thoroughly confused, I don’t blame you. Let me explain. The passage quoted above comes from A Canticle for Leibowitz, a still-riveting novel published in 1959. I probably read it a year or two later and in that I was anything but unique. Like many American teens of the 1950s and early 1960s, I spent an inordinate amount of time in the irradiated lands between the Great Salt Lake and Old El Paso or other planetary dead zones like it, thanks to what was then called “pulp fiction.”

In those days, post-apocalyptic futures were us.

.....(snip).....

After all, we’re talking about atomic power; about, that is, the primordial forces of nature. So why shouldn’t we raise primordial questions that remind us of the powers we insist, most of the time, on handling so blithely? As Jonathan Schell wrote recently, “a stumbling, imperfect, probably imperfectable creature like ourselves is unfit to wield the stellar fire released by the split or fused atom... The earth is provided with enough primordial forces of destruction without our help in introducing more.” Understandably, for all sorts of reasons, including venality and simple fear, governments (and those who write about them) have the urge to try to tame the atom even as it threatens us, to turn Fukushima into a garden-variety 24/7 story, which it isn’t. ................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175370/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_the_worst_that_could_happen/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sky proof helmets for sale Chicken Little. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. so you don't think nuclear power is dangerous and these disasters could eventually have a cumulative
effect on the environment?

Or that in a few hundred years people won't forget where those radioactive waste dumps are leaking into water tables like at Hanford, up the Columbia River from my hometown?

Ostriches with their heads in the sand are a bigger problem than chicken littles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Key disclaimer here:
"I’m no scientist and have no scientific basis for assessing what’s going to happen in Japan"

This is bad, no question, and I don't know who the Japanese think they're kidding by rating Fukushima even with Three Mile Island. But we're not going to end up with Japan as a post-apocalyptic hellscape, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC