Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Question Weak Oil Speculation Rule - ThinkProgress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 04:20 PM
Original message
Senators Question Weak Oil Speculation Rule - ThinkProgress
... the real reason we have seen spikes in commodity prices such as oil and various food commodities (corn, wheat etc) over the last few yearss is because of excessive speculation in commodities. If trading in commodities is not limited to commercial buyers of commodities (entities which actually buy commodities to conduct their normal business) with strong limitations on speculators in commodities (entities that do not use commodities in their normal business but that are just betting on the price of certain commodities) we will continue to see oil and food be subject to the gambling activities of commodities speculators. One of the big players in this arena is Goldman Sachs who was hording oil during the 2007-2008 run-up of prices in oil.

I urge people to email your Senators and Congessmen to demand severe limitations on commodities speculation. This will have to be done with legislation as the Commodities Futures Trading Commission is composed of complete toadies of the Wall Street BAnks and Brokerage houses who make billions from commodities trading (and who also speculate in commodities for their own accounts).

What we need, in addition to real position limits, is a financial transactions fee. This would cut down on the speculative trades not only in commodities but also in common stocks. You can email your Senators and Representatives at http://www.congress.org


http://thinkprogress.org/green/2011/10/18/346567/senators-question-weak-oil-speculation-rule/

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is poised to vote on position limits for oil trading, but some senators are concerned that the rule will be too weak to diminish oil speculation. Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) both wrote letters to CFTC Commissioner Gary Gensler, asking him to take stronger steps to curb financial speculators like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Sanders called the expected rule “simply unacceptable“:


Unfortunately, if recent reports in the media are correct, the final rule on position limits, as currently drafted, will do little or nothing to lower prices and it will not eliminate, prevent or diminish excessive speculation as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. At a time when the American people are experiencing extremely high oil and gas prices, this would be simply unacceptable.

Financial institutions have grossly distorted oil and other commodity markets that used to be dominated by actual buyers and sellers of the underlying products. The Dodd-Frank Act mandated that the CFTC establish stronger limits on financial speculation in commodity markets by Jan. 17, 2011. Nine months behind schedule, the CFTC is planning to establish position limits that would allow a single speculator to control 25 percent of the physically deliverable supply of oil, and to control 125 percent of the cash-settled supply.

Sanders also called on the CFTC to ban “speculative commodity index fund trading,” citing the new report by Better Markets that identifies commodity index funds as the “primary drivers of excessive speculation.”
(more)
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the rules arent tough enough it will only make things worse
The new regs may only serve to weed out the smaller players, solidifying the control of commodities into the vary large speculative firms.

In effect, creating commodity monopolies that will drive prices even higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. so important. unfortunately these sortof 'technical' issues don't get people's attention.
recommended!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC