Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The lost bases of the US empire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 10:19 AM
Original message
The lost bases of the US empire
Edited on Sat Oct-29-11 10:19 AM by bemildred
The US maintains more than 700 military facilities on foreign soil that may not be as sustainable in the near future.]

Remember the bases? As the world reeled from the sheer audacity of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, many feared the US was seeking to establish a permanent presence in that country.

The idea was plausible enough. The stability of Saudi Arabia was far from assured. Why not establish a friendly client state in another major oil producing country?

Iraq would be made into a dependent and profitable ally of the US from bases there, and US power and influence could be projected across the region.


http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/10/201110281131439692.html
Refresh | +18 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Decline and fall
Interesting article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a constant process
We had bases in South Vietnam and the Phillipines that cost plenty, and are now not part of the security network.

It's not about projecting power over the long term, it's about the construction/supply contracts that result from the bases. All the better that they be abandoned, as far as the MIC is concerned, that just means more contracts for new ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's been downhill since the Vietnam debacle.
Near as I can tell, our political leaders are incapable of changing their ways, no matter what happens. I mean it's not like they have not been told, over and over again, and it's not like it's been working. Gulf War I is the only one I can think of since WWII which was a clear "win", and that was OBVIOUSLY because we had the wit to leave afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But the Vietnam debacle
was lost because of the hippies not because of failed US foreign policy.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a waste of everything. Closing bases here to build
everywhere else in the world. Makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. the MIC made money. and after all isn't that what's most important in
the new Shock Doctrine world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have never figured out where that 700 number came from
Edited on Sun Oct-30-11 01:15 PM by hack89
and what constitutes a"military base". Do they count bases where we simply have access rights but no permanent presence? Do they count ever single little outpost and training area? What is the criteria they use?

Because when I look at this list I don't see 700 overseas bases:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_military_bases#Overseas
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC