Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They're Throwing Journalists Into Jail Right Here In The USA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
indigobusiness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 11:38 AM
Original message
They're Throwing Journalists Into Jail Right Here In The USA
snip

But now similar abuses are about to unfold within the United States, part of an alarming new pattern of assault on American freedom of the press. In the last few months, three different U.S. federal judges, each appointed by President Ronald Reagan, have found a total of eight journalists in contempt of court for refusing to reveal confidential sources, and the first of them may go to prison before the year is out. Some of the rest may be in prison by spring.

The first reporter likely to go to jail is Jim Taricani, a television reporter for the NBC station in Providence. Taricani obtained and broadcast, completely legally, a videotape of a city official as he accepted an envelope full of cash.

U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres found Taricani in contempt for refusing to identify the person he got the videotape from, and the judge fined him $1,000 a day. That hasn't broken Taricani, so Torres has set a hearing for Nov. 18 to decide whether to squeeze him by throwing him in jail.

Then there's Patrick Fitzgerald, the overzealous special prosecutor who is the Inspector Javert of our age. Fitzgerald hasn't made any progress in punishing the White House officials believed to have leaked the identity of the CIA officer Valerie Plame to Robert Novak. But Fitzgerald seems determined to imprison two reporters who committed no crime, Judith Miller of The New York Times and Matthew Cooper of Time, because they won't blab about confidential sources.

snip

http://www.theday.com/eng/web/news/re.aspx?re=681a109c-3fb3-4a6e-a0b6-0401ff196f77&prnt=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I weep no tears for Judith Miller
If for nothing else, she deserves an orange jumpsuit for her criminally negligent reporting which beat the drum loud and proud for Bush's high crime and misdemeanor "march to war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigobusiness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. When they come for the journalists you would weep for
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 12:19 PM by indigobusiness
what will you say?.
Rights are to be protected for all, blindly.
If Novak and Miller can be prosecuted while affording them their rights, by all means string 'em up. But there is a fundamental threat to everyone here.
I'm not sure what to make of this, but it is troubling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I said I weep no tears for Judith Miller
...and why. Not that she should or shouldn't be singled out, and not that I don't stand by freedom of the press, etc. I simply weep no tears for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigobusiness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of course not, who would?
My point was that bigger issues are often lost amidst the noise of smaller ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know.
n/t :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Old News
We've been tossing journalists in jail for not revealing sources for years. And it's all perfectly legal per the Supreme Court case Branzburg v. Hayes. There's a summation of the findings here:

http://www.mobar.org/handbook/journalist.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Locking as duplicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC