Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bullies at the Airport

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
theearthisround Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:07 PM
Original message
Bullies at the Airport
http://www.antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=4079

If you traveled by air last week for the Thanksgiving holiday, you undoubtedly witnessed Transportation Security Administration agents conducting aggressive searches of some passengers. A new TSA policy begun in September calls for invasive and humiliating searches of random passengers; in some instances crude pat-downs have taken place in full public view. Some female travelers quite understandably have burst into tears upon being groped, and one can only imagine the lawsuits if TSA were a private company. But TSA is not private, TSA is a federal agency – and therefore totally unaccountable to the American people.

TSA was created in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Although the National Guard, DOD, FBI, CIA, NSA, and FAA utterly failed to protect American citizens on that tragic day, federal legislators immediately proposed creating yet another government agency. But the commercial flying community did not want airport security federalized, and my office was inundated with messages from airline pilots opposing the creation of TSA. One pilot stated, "I don't want the same people who bring me the IRS and ATF to be in charge of airport security." But Congress didn't listen to the men and women who spend their working lives flying, so it created another agency that costs billions of dollars, employs thousands of unionized federal workers, and produces poor results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Simple, stop flying, let them go out of business, end of story. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice to see another antiwar.com reader
Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The word was passed down from on high.
Pretend your doing something to protect air travelers. So by harassing and discouraging air travelers from ever flying again they have in a round about way succeeded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. On Sunday the LA Times
ran an article very sympathetic to the TSA screeners. Ironically they chose to publish a photo of a couple of suspected "terrorists" getting a pat down. These terrorists were the sweetest looking little four year old boy you could imagine along with his grandma. Yep. I feel soooo much better knowing that I'm being kept safe from wanton acts of terror by four year olds and their grandmothers! Last summer I was subjected to one of those humiliating pat-down searches when the metal detector went off thanks to surgical pins from an old ankle injury. I pointed to the scar, but the screener would have none of it. Insisted on a full-on bra examination in full view of other passengers. I complained loudly and was probably lucky not to have been arrested. Was amazed at the people simply putting up with this shit as though it's doing some good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who trained them, the Gropinator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Looking busy
This whole groping and eradicating civil liberties in the name of "national security" is almost wholly unnecessary.

None of this was in place on Sept. 11th and they (Bush, Cheney, Rice) had all the information needed to deter and stop the hijackers, but insider reports from the FBI and CIA paint a picture of those agencies being given orders to deliberately stand down.

This whole twisted "searching grandmothers and children, groping women" push for "national security" is a bunch of utter garbage.

BTW, the aggressive groping of women reminds me very much of the abuse suffered by female inmates at Abu Ghraib.

Is that where we're headed next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC