The US Media Covering Bush Administration's Ass Once Again

Liberal media my ass, once again the jerkoffs in our collective media are using weapons of mass ditraction to avoid the real issue. This article http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/10/chattanooga.paper.ap/index.html illustrates my point. Now they are making a stink because the question asked of Rumsfeld yesterday was 'planted' by a reporter. Like that makes a frigging defference on the validity of the question. They talk like it's unethical!? They did the same with that Texas ass-face's military records. They said the docs were probably forged to COVER BUSH'S ASS. Then they assault Dan Rather for using forged docs. Am I the only one who saw dozens of people say what the docs said WAS TRUE? HE DIDN'T REPORT TO HIS LAST YEAR OF SERVICE! So here we go, the sheep are being corralled again. NEVERMIND THE VALIDITY OF THE QUESTION, YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED FOR ASKING. The pigs have whips and are walking out of the farmhouse with a bucket of white paint. Pinch me when I wake up, or you do for that matter.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/10/chattanooga.paper.ap/index.html

let's just tell the whole lot we'll not rest until they're all hanging from telepoles, their family's deported to far north and their estates cashed in by liberal government....hahaha

Funny how they didn't get on No-facts when he "planted" the outing of a CIA agent to discredit her husband...or how they didn't seem too concerned about who was funding (seeding the $) for the Swift Boat Liars...or how they didn't seem too interested when the head of Diebold "planted" the vote-stealing technology to "guarantee" a * win in Ohio...or how they don't seem too conerned about the blatant LYING that's been coming out of bushco for years...