symbolman on MSNBC tonight re:MoveOn entry and BushNoNazi flash on TBTM

Hey all,

Had a great time at the MoveOn show in NYC last night (except for not winning :) ) but got a call from MSNBC for an interview on Scarbourough's show tonight - on around 10pm NYC time about my "BUSH is Not Nazi so Stop saying that.." flash animation on Take Back the Media http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bushnonazi.html

and the fact that I was a finalist for our ARMY OF ONE ad -- it appears that they think that the BUSHNONAZI was my entry and I'm going to set them straight..

They may have Michael Mann (?) on there as well, so they might be dogpilling on the rabbit -- ME :) I don't mind, it's kind of fun..

I talked to Eli Pariser to make sure I don't step on any toes, really nice guy, did a great job on CNN defending the Bush/Nazi allegations and brewha that the media is creating over this..

So, anyone got any tips for me? I've been thinking of hammering them over the "Clintonistas" "FemiNazis" ""Hiltlery Clinton" etc..

also, look for my prop if I get a chance to bring it out..

Thanks Moveon!

Or not by name.

Hitlery is a good one, I hear that a lot.

he is a nasty piece of work, a Bush whore to the core. You will do nicely.

"Selective outrage, Joe? I don't remember gasps of horror from you when Limbaugh compared feminists to nazis."

I was looking for my wife who apparently had been issued two passes so they seemed to be trying to kick her out or move her somewhere..

but I got the tape and will watch it as soon as I get a VCR

what a blast...

anyway, surprised at how tepid Scarborough was - no sneaky attacks on you, and he actually... THANKED Bill Greider of the Nation... Appreciative of the NATION?!?

he was on bizarro world tonight...

the Army War College repott compares Bush's war on terror to Hitler's wars.

do you have a link? I'm on the road right now and don't have a lot of internet access..

I'd love to bring this up..

thanks all!

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usarmy133624030jan13,0,1443064.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-headlines

Record likens the scale of U.S. ambitions in the war on terrorism to Hitler's overreach in World War II. "A cardinal rule of strategy is to keep your enemies to a manageable number," he writes. "The Germans were defeated in two world wars ... because their strategic ends outran their available means."

more...

It's about strategy, but comparisons to Hitler, by name, are never made lightly.

I also heard something today about Canadians not wanting to "appease" Bush. :-)

http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/pubs/2003/bounding/bounding.htm

That's the link to the report itself.

The quote is:

"A cardinal rule of strategy is to keep your enemies to a manageable number," he writes. "The Germans were defeated in two world wars . . . because their strategic ends outran their available means."

I'm finding the page number now for you. I pulled that from a Washington Post article.

But the constant comparisons of the Clintons to Nazis should be sufficient. Want me to run a search for you? Hitler and Feminazi should be plenty.

And you should be able to slide the word Klasutis in, right? :evilgrin:

I told the producer I had a crack research team and they were called "the internet community" -- can't buy that kind of help!

Any links are all appreciated.. great!

“Naturally the common people don’t want war. But after all, it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it’s always a
simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
for exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every
country.”
--- Hermann Goering, Hitler’s Reich Marshall, at the Nuremberg
Trials after World War II.

I emailed this to you, because DU is acting froggy. Will also PM you the same stuff, just in case.

I did a little research, this took ten minutes. Clinton/Hitler reference from Rush and Newsmax and three US Congressmen. Ask Joe if he got upset about that.

Congressmen first (Helen Chenoweth-Hage, John Shadegg, and Jay Dickey, all Republicans), then Rush, then a ton of Newsmax posts.

Washington Post, June 28, 2000, via

http://tooney.catch.com/entry.php?id=P25558_0_15_0

There's something about Bill. President Clinton has always had an extraordinary knack for driving Republicans--and often Democrats--absolutely 'round the bend. How else to explain the recurrent comparisons to Adolf Hitler that keep surfacing when folks talk about Clinton and his administration?

For example, retiring Rep. Helen Chenoweth-Hage (R-Idaho), commenting on one of Clinton's national monument designations, said, "This president is engaging in the largest land grab since the invasion of Poland."

Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) went a bit further a couple of weeks ago when Clinton designated Arizona's Ironwood Forest a national monument. "I would draw a parallel to Hitler," Shadegg said. "He eroded the will of the German people to resist evil."

Our favorite is Arkansas Republican Rep. Jay Dickey's recent fundraising letter reminding supporters they can give him $1,000 for the primary and another $1,000 in the general election campaign. He doesn't want anyone to "later . . . say to me that I should have reminded you of the threats," he said.

"Just as people who read Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' and then later were surprised at the evils of the 3rd Reich ," Dickey said, "we have the blueprint for what the White House plans to do: defeat me! This is because I not only dared to vote my conscience on the impeachment issue, but dared to do it after a publicly expressed threat that I would lose the election if I did. Are we going to let an astounding abuse of power go unanswered?"

http://www.rushonline.com/clinton/impeachmentlearned.htm

As Hitler proved in Germany, the most dangerous leader may be elected and have enormous popularity. Hopefully Clinton is no Hitler, but he is certainly as good a liar.


http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/10/5/184006.shtml

1. Bill Clinton Admired Hitler Too

We are not sure Arnold Schwarzenegger admired Adolph Hitler. If he did, he would share something with Bill Clinton.

The Clintons' anti-Semitism is now well known.

snip

Clinton's interest in Hitler was not based on the fascist leader's anti-Semitism, but the great leadership skills of Hitler, according to Patterson.

Clinton, Patterson remembered, was intrigued that Hitler "had so much power over these people and that it had just been a short period of time since World War I where they'd been defeated, and this man had come forward and had rallied the German people."

http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=1999/11/13/081126

Bill Clinton and How He Got That Way
Norman Liebmann
November 11, 1999

In order to understand more poignantly Bill Clinton's character, it is useful to recall the ancestors whose blood flows in his veins. Here is a list of some of Bill Clinton's antecedents, and the quotations by which they are best remembered and defined. Conclusions are irresistible:

ADOLPH HITLER CLINTON: "The fact that nobody in Arkansas wears shoes does not necessarily mean they're not Aryans."

http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/9/21/11249

He did find it bothersome, however, that Bill Clinton had a deep fascination for Adolf Hitler and his book Mein Kampf.

http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/4/13/114554

In the Sudeten crisis, Hitler claimed to be inspired by internationalist ideals. "Among the fourteen points which President Wilson promised ..." the Fuhrer proclaimed, "was the fundamental principle of the self-determination of all peoples ..." By freeing the Sudeten Germans, Hitler argued, he was fulfilling Wilson's vision.

Clinton too claims he is fighting for human rights. But ethnic cleansing does not bother Clinton when his friends are the ones doing the cleansing. He ordered no bombing when the Croatians drove 300,000 Serbs from Krajina, burning their homes and killing many. Nor did he intervene when our NATO ally Turkey slaughtered over 35,000 Kurds.

Every schoolchild today knows that Hitler's real goal, in seizing Czechoslovakia, was to use it as a stepping stone for his planned invasion of Russia.

But what is Clinton's real interest in Kosovo? Nobody knows.


http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/2/28/213752
Thursday, Feb. 28, 2002 10:26 p.m. EST

Gennifer Flowers Warns: President Hillary Would Be 'Hitler-esque'

The woman who first tried to warn America about Bill and Hillary Clinton in 1991 said last week that the prospect of the former first lady becoming president of the United States is "Hitler-esque."

(snip) War College Report: Iraq War an 'Error'
Tue Jan 13,12:21 AM ET Add White House - AP Cabinet & State to My Yahoo!


By BOB JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer

MONTGOMERY, Ala. - A report published by the Army War College calls the Bush administration's war on terrorism unfocused and says the invasion of Iraq (news - web sites) was "a strategic error."

The research paper by Jeffrey Record, a professor at the Air War College at Maxwell Air Force Base in Montgomery, said the president's strategy "promises much more than it can deliver" and threatens to spread U.S. military resources too thin. Record also wrote that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s Iraq did not present a threat to the United States and was a distraction from the war on terrorism.


Record is a visiting professor at the Army War College at Carlisle Barracks, Pa. The paper was published last month by the Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute.


Lt. Col. Merideth Bucher, public affairs officer for the Army War College, said Monday it is not unusual for students, mostly higher ranking officers, at the war college to be exposed to critical thought that might be contrary to current national policy. She said students are often exposed to speakers with varying views.
(snip/...)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=542&ncid=716&e=6&u=/ap/20040113/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/army_report

Here's the thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=311689#311823

Good luck, symbolman, you're getting to be a real tv veteran now.
Don't let Joe Scarborough get anywhere near you if he has a blunt instrument in his hand!

give 'em hell if you do!!!!

run comparing Max Cleland to Osama bin Laden and the ads comparing Daschle to Saddam. I think that's right, anyway, you might want to doublecheck. It may not have been the RNC that did it but one of their freaky groups.

Edited to add:
Good Luck, I'll be watching and rooting for you!

and give your sister a BIG HUG for us, will you?

We'll call her soon, been busy and running all over the country..

You Rock and so does your sis :)

and he simply stated that the RNC never sanctioned those ads, wouldn't, and he knew nothing about it.

The same argument is true of the DNC in regards to the MoveOn.org ads.

hmmm...........

i'd be ready with a clear, straightforward list of reasons which illustrate the parallels and explain **why** some people *might* compare bushco to the nazis and the chimp to hitler, while stressing that the comparison really should NOT be made.

why?

well, because bushco is really more fascist than nazi what with the corporate takeover of the government.....

of course, they'll kill your mike before you get that far...

good luck. scarborough is about the lowest of the low. will you have to sit in the same studio? <shudder> only santorectum induces an equal gag reflex

but his administration, and the nation during his administration, have manifest many behaviors that are parallel to the nazi's, fascists, falangists, etc.

It is essential for the safety of the nation to have had such parallels made manifest. The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance.

1) Your Ad demonstrates that the surveillance of the government by its citizens is healthy and functioning.

2) It challenges the administration and the Bush family to explain why their behavior is/was justified when it facilitates such dreadful comparisons.

"Why aren't you a nazi?" is certainly a loaded question to be asked of a President in public, but then Patriot Act and the Children of Patriot Act erosions of civil rights aren't fun either.

BTW, did you notice those guys on the right with the sunglasses?

Remind Ol Joe about how they pump up the phony outrage when it's a dem and clam up when it's a repube.. His own "story" is a prime example. His guys hounded Condit to the ends of the earth, and yet his own dead girl was a blip and then gone :)

Mention Hitlery, mention Cleland, mention the Osama/Daschle comparison. Ask them why they ignored those ads, and when they deny ignoring them(which they will) ask them when the last show they did about that subject was. Tell them you want a transcript.

Call them out for their obvious Bush support, and their double-standards.

You will do fine, just relax and talk right over them in a calm manner.

They are all cowards and they collapse when the truth is shoved in thier face. Put them on the defensive.

I like that -- making up 3X5 cards right now.. want to be ready for everything I can.. anyone heard of Michael Mann? Radio guy.. evidently he did an article for the USA TODAY yesterday about stars taking the higher road on the right wing..

anyone remember Schwartzenegger's shout out to Hitler?

another zinger

Arnold invited this Nazi to his wedding, even after all the fury about his outing as a SS officer came to light.

So even when a Republican professes respect for Hitler, and maintains close friendship with a Nazi SS officer, the Reich Wing disallows discussion of Arnold's political leanings.

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20030825-090130-5881r.htm

Mr. Mann testified before the Senate committee that his research is the "mainstream view" because it is featured in a chapter of the U.N. Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, of which Mr. Mann was a lead author. Mr. Soon and Ms. Baliunas challenged Mr. Mann's claim by reviewing the large body of literature that shows his claims to be unsubstantiated and his research to be fatally flawed. In truth, Mr. Mann's work is the scientific outlier — the one study that does not fit with the wealth of scientific evidence.


Why is all this important? Global warming alarmists would have governments impose significant regulations with tremendous economic implications. The Bush administration is under attack simply for stating that the science is uncertain whether human-induced global warming is occurring. At the same time, scientists that add credence to that assertion are being silenced.

Entire article--
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20030825-090130-5881r.htm

Look as middle-of-the-road as possible. It will only help. They may encourage you to wear a hemp vest and a jamaician hat with a big pot leaf on it just to make you look like a freak.

I'm not joking. I work in the media.

on edit: I have no idea what you look like now, so don't take this message personally. Maybe you already look like a mormon life-insurance salesman. :)

and I AM respectable -- I'm trying to CHANGE the media not become a short haired freak :)

I also wear a hat backwards and Joe commented about that last time so next time he gets personal I'm going to say "If you want to get personal Joe why don't we discuss the botched investigation into the death of that perfectly healthy intern in your office?"

should shut him up..

being a little "hippy" looking can be an advantage if your mind is working..

sort of surprises them, like a talking horse or something :)

but thanks!

she was very dead and the story smells very very bad...

http://www.americanpolitics.com/20010808Klausutis.html

Lori (not Laurie - really nitpicking, sorry) was NOT an intern and when we use that it just makes us look uninformed. Yes, Lori was an office staffer.

Whoops - almost forgot. Congratulations, Symbolman - will definitely be watching. As always, you will do great!

has been that they never show the ad so that it is comprehensible, so most people have no idea what the ad is saying. The brains go off at the "OMG, they compared Bush to Hitler?"

So the media have declared that it is politically incorrect to draw parallels, and take this as the 11th commandment.

They will obviously paint you as a latte drinking left wing horror show because you are politically incorrect, and corner you into saying something remarkable in defense of a position that they have already defined as equivalent to eating your children.

Don't let them state flat out that no comparison, or thinking about comparisons is valid. Charlie Chaplin made fun of Hitler in "the Great Dictator", and it is a cultural classic. Its a different context and situation, but the point is, commentary and free thinking are essential to the survival of democracy, and the minute we accept what the right wing is suggesting about no comparison being valid, without giving thought to the arguments being made, we open the path to totalitarianism that much faster.

I don't know if I can stomach Scarbourgh or not - but will try.

A real easy one-liner - if Bush didn't want to be compared to Hitler - he shouldn't be acting like him. Plus the Bush family history, ole grandpa Prescott trading with the enemy.

I should have known you were the one who made the "Bush is no nazi" flash! It is so great!
Sorry you did not win, but no problem, you're still a genius anyway!

I would say use "hitlery" and "feminazi", but also point out that while Hilary Clinton was never in a position to exercise power and neither were the feminists referred to as feminazis, George W.Bush is now the most powerful man on Earth, and is in a position to enforce his famous "Bush doctrine" which reads a lot like a Hitler doctrine:
pre-emptive wars, secrecy, disregard for International Law ("Gee, says Smirk, I'm gonna call my lawyer, ha ha"), militarization of Foreign Policy, disregard for the US Constitution (Patriot Act).

I think what shocks people about the Hitler comparison, is that they say Smirky has not started the Holocaust of 9 million people, and it's unfair to them to compare. Make sure you tell them that you are talking about the similarities of the "Bush Doctrine" with Hitler's policies, and not about the Holocaust part. Smirk has killed a lot of people, but not in the millions yet. He left that to his Grandpa.
Uh ho...I'm getting carried away...

Good luck on Scarborough, and don't mention the dead intern unless absolutely necessary :)

a Refudgelican Bushbot! Lockstep looks so much like Goose step that it just adds up to Nazi! Then there is Hitler, Stalin and Saddam who all strutted around in bits of military uniforms and needed to keep everything they did SECRET!

EDIT}}BTW, don't forget to remind them that, the people all over the world protesting Shrub's aggression, who show up with all those Bush/Hitler signs are more than likely not democrats! Just the ones here are patriotic worried democrats that see the same resemblance!

I was watching CNN yesterday (I don't ususally) and I was struck by how first they had this news article about having new airport security where they get people's information so that they can run criminal checks or whatever on them. Made me think about how protestors are often arrested for no good reason and how they could be kept from flying.

Of course CNN (Wolf Blitzer) had no problem with that.

Then Wolf goes practically ballistic about the idea that ANYONE (in Soros interview) would compare Bush* with Hitler.

I thought it was surreal. Plus Wolf did not wish to hear why Soros might spend 12 million to get rid of Bush* - he just wanted to suppress anyone from making the Bush*/Hitler comparison.

My guess is that they want to get the public to pressure anyone making the comparison - to make it publically unacceptable.

Anything anyone can do to make it a topic of nationally televised discussion would be appreciated.

make SURE you include this

http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=10618

Zack Exley was SUED by the Bush campaign, remember?

"There ought to be limits to freedom," he said. "We're aware of the site, and this guy is just a garbage man."

that's what he said, in context.

the context of a website that parodied his own campaign website.

not limits to freedom in the context of the war on terror, or anything even approaching that, but in the exercise of political FREE SPEECH; parody, even.

ask him if he thinks people like Rush Limbaugh should have their freedoms curtailed, or whether Jesse Helms should have been jailed for threatening the life of Clinton when WJC was planning a trip to NC.

Or whether Pat Robertson should, at the very least, been institutionalized for his call to have Foggy Bottom nuked.

please please please bring up the limits to freedom quote, though.

what's more FASCIST than that? especially in the context it was said.

BTW

you could draw this parallel to what's happening now and this infamous, yet spot-on quotation:

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

is there a better description for what is emerging as we sit around and watch our feedoms swirl down the drain of government/corporate media unification?

keep it short, simple

repeat your points over and over, especially when he asks you a question designed to put him on the defensive, which they ALL will be

IGNORE his questions, and turn to one of your own talking points

ask HIM something that will put HIM on the defensive

something about Lori would be swell, but not til the end.

you know that if you do, you'll NEVER be asked back

if you have the nerve, ask him about his JOKING about KILLING her on Imus

.....On May 29, 2003, Scarborough appeared on Don Imus's radio show. While complimenting Scarborough on his sense of humor, Imus said, "Don't be afraid to be funny, because you are funny. I asked you why you aren't in Congress. You said that you had sex with the intern, and then you had to kill her." Scarborough laughed and replied, "Yeah, well, what are you gonna do?"

isn't that special?

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg108589.html

thanks to the indefatigable Denis Wright, without whom (as well as a very few other people who didn't give up), this story would be completly forgotten

:evilgrin: He'll understand.

http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/archives/2004_01_04_dneiwert_archive.html

<snip>

And then there was this charming exchange:

GRISWOLD: You need to get out and see this country.

TAYLOR: Hey, then you name one yourself. Name one Mexican neighborhood you‘d like to live in.

This is typical. These are people who say, OK, this is great. I don‘t care if these Mexicans are going to live 20 or 30 in a house, because it‘s not my daughter who's going to look across the back fence and see them urinating in their yard. No, I'm happy to get a guy who can mow the lawn for $2 an hour and that‘s all I care about. This is a much bigger question.

Scarborough's only counter to this vile bigotry was that Taylor was offering "stereotypes that you may not agree with."

<snip>

King? He usually appears on Faux..His freeper name is mhking.

would it be funny to get a real cheezy, combover wig, and tuck your hair into that?

make fun of the shorthair in service of respectability BS?

the key here is to show that any lowering of the debate was pioneered by limbaugh ("feminazis, "environmentalist whackos",) michael savage ("red diaper dooper babies" - incidentally joe praises savage as a guy "who tells it like it is")


bring up the double standard of how the gop refers to anyone on the left as a communist - (limbaugh with "nikita dean", hannity's new book title "deliver us from evil - the battle against terrorism, despotism, and liberalism", etc)

the fact that scarborough's promos accuse michael moore and others of "hating america" and being a traitor of some kind

and the fact that this whole bush-hitler thing started from ONE ENTRY in a contest of 1500 and was not created or aired by moveon.org. it's just the media getting lazy and having matt drudge write the headline for them

the GOP actually paid for and aired willie horton, daschle/saddam, cleland/osama

and when joe gets condescending, ask him if he practices his sneer in the mirror

...just some ideas

I wouldn't watch this unless a DUer were coming on.

you were GREAT although I wish they would have had you answering that nitwit critic who was wondering WHO IS CALLING US TRAITORS - dear GOD, I should have him listen to TEN MINUTES OF TALK RADIO HERE IN TEXAS.

Also, as a veteran I'm very impressed with your ad and thank you for TRULY SUPPORTING THE TROOPS.

P.S. you are quite a cutie pie too. :7

he sure was full of crap. contradicting himself, it seemed to me...

whining about the hollywood bunch... His argument basically amounted to: we're criticising them for complaining that we're critical of them,

He is an idiot. Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. A complete moron. He doesn't have the talent to even annoy me.

Even Scarborough was impressed with the ads.

I think that he now recognizes the power that can be harnessed by creative souls with home computers. You showed him.

Believe me, Joe Scarborough has new respect for you.

wwooooohhoooo!

Way to go! :toast:

You did really well - you make us proud.

By the way, I sense a real change in Scarborough's attitude from the last time you were on. He was actually pretty open-minded and civil. Um-m-m, wonder what could be transpiring?

Poor Joe had nothing to rage against ....

You did us good ...

that was easier than I thought, no mention of nazi this and nazi that except for the piece they showed still slamming MoveOn..

little turd actually liked it.. may be good since it's going to be running around New Hampshire for the next few weeks as will we..

we;re doing Take Back the media shows now and trying to drum up the bucks to chase around to all the swing states and cover the scene and change some of it for the better if possible.. we'll post a list of where we are going and the shows later..

thanks for all the good items, didn't get to use them -- I was all ready for a fight and the guy went all gooey on me, and I wasn't ready for that :)

but a lot of people saw our ad nationwide and that's fine with me..

many thanks my fellow DU'rs

Thanks for doing what you do, man!

i didn't get to brooklyn in time to see the segment. :grr: (but we did have great seats for Urinetown. love that show!

very glad to hear it went well!

what was the 'prop'?

For those that missed the segment of Symbolman on Scarbourough.

Here It is. :)

Mike Stinson

Do I do 'save' or 'open'?
I have supposedly copied some things before and then I can't get them to play, or where do I find them to get them to play, OR...

This whole thing just confuses me and all I want to do is WATCH IT.

If you're on Windows, you should just hit "open", and it'll open in Windows Media Player.

If it doesn't, PM me and I'll walk you through it.

When I clicked on the link to watch the clip. Windows Media player (ver 7.01) started and then displayed a message that it was connecting to the codec server and downloading a codec. Once the codec downloaded I got another message saying that the codec was improperly signed and could not be installed. After that I was able to hear the audio but without the video.

Anyone have any suggestions for installing the codec? TIA

wow! a surprisingly positive segment. michael, great job! and i'm stunned that he played both ads in full.

"is MoveOn moving to the center?"

answer: maybe MoveOn is broader than corporate media would like to portray them...

ARGH! All I get is a bunch of code, no sound or video. Is it because DU is sooooooooooooooooooooo slooooooooooooooooooooooow? I guess I'll try later.

You handled the interview perfectly, and your ad is terrific! :toast:

I just watched the video of your appearance!

:yourock: :yourock: :yourock: :yourock: :yourock: :yourock:

What, I wonder, does Scarman think liberals are concerned about anyway? Does he think it odd that liberal activists would be concerned about shafting veterans in wartime? Is it paradigm shattering to think that Democrats would be concerned about irresponsible defecit spending?

What does he think, that we're mostly hardline Stalinists?

Actually, what that interview shows me is how deeply powerful your message, and that of many of the MoveOn finalists, really is. People can be REACHED on these issues. They're perceived as CENTRIST, even by rightwing media whores. And, just as important, THEY PLAYED "Army of One" ON CABLE TELEVISION NATIONWIDE.

You just hit one out of the park, Symbolman!

:toast:

Seemed like Scarboro really didn't get to attack. I think he was trying to find some battle ground, but you seemd to sort of diffused him.

I like the fact that you looked freakish (by establishment standards), with the long hair and yellow hat, yet demonstrated perfect sentiment, spirit and articulation. It drove home the fact that this is about real people and you're not some primped up person who is going to look different than you would everyday.

It amounted to you getting URLs out and airplay for two extremely reaching issues for all Americans, and yet Scarboro didn't effective take any advantage for his side.

His main point he was lost on the fact that you can't speak for MoveOn and the next point you fed him it left him praising the event looking like he was singing Kum-bay-ya with the enemy.

It came on after the Iowa debate on Sunday during the Chris Matthews debate wrapup. It started 1/4 way into it, but it was definitely the "Army of One" ad. Do you know how it got on the air?

just watched the vid.

EXCELLENT! AMAZING! BRAVO!!

Watched the program last night to see your segment, and was flat out stunned.

I was expecting Scarborough to be his normal obnoxious self- and you having to defend yourself against ridicule and dismissal.

The guy before you -Michael Medved?- was setting it up for fireworks, mockery and nastiness to be piled on you and I was very concerned for you and what you were going to have to contend with.

What a shocker. You handled it brilliantly. It was a beautiful thing to watch. Felt like you took all his ammunition, put it in your pocket and didn't give one piece of it back. You just very calmly and straightforwardly got your message out, and left him with nothing.

Well done.

Make him point out the info thats false or admit that it is true.

Too many time repubs get away with addressing everything except the topic at hand.

If the info in the ad is true, it is not a smear.

Force him to stay on topic.

I saw the archived clip. You stayed on-topic, and didn't let the host run the whole interview. Great job! :thumbsup:

I've seen your work...love it! I'm glad to hear you did a smackdown, sorry I missed it. Is it archived on MSNBC?

well worth seeing...

Scary pic nostamj....those shades are sooooooo 1970's.

I'm grateful for your effort and ability! I was truly moved by some of the things I saw on your fine web page! Thank You!!!!!

Check out the new video just released by Incubus (the band's lead singer looks just like Mavs point guard Canadian Steve Nash).
It's called "Megalomaniac" and skewers the Death Merchants and their propensity to hide their evil deeds behind the veil of "righteousness". Fantastic. You wanna talk about Bush/Hitler allusions? Man...

http://66.230.230.110/radio/sym-1-13.rm

Courtesy of TBTM Rapid Response.

-as

just watched a video of you on scarborough country. i missed it last night. nice job, good work, kudos kudos!

alot of people to check out your site and Move On. I can't stand Scarborough and only watched to see the report and you. I thought he was less "on the attack" than the few times I've seen his show.

I think it was your good influence. Many Thanks for all you and Stranger have done and are still doing! :toast: