GRAPHIC VIDEO: U.S. Soldiers Execute Iraqis!

Apache gun camera footage:
http://www.btinternet.com/~red23uk/224Helicopter_Kills.mpg

Is it just me or did those Iraqis pose no threat whatsoever?

Infantry vs. helicopter is a pretty lopsided fight, yes, but that's why we spend money on technology.

to support our tank divisions in Europe against the USSRs far superior numbers. Thereby helping to prevent nuclear war. It was not designed as an anti-personnel weapon.

Jay

Although certainly capable of serving in an anti-armor, role the Apache is a multirole, versatile fighter, and is not exclusive to tanks.

It can carry several different weapons configurations, some of which are in fact designed for anti-personnel use.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/ah-64.htm for more information

can anyone explain that to me?

Who is the enemy, what is he fighting to acheive, and who is he being led by?

And I'd guess there are a number of different answers to your other questions.

... especially with last one being shot-up, being obviously wounded and trying to crawl away.

http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/story795.shtml

The MPEG format file has been posted to several right-wing US forums, where the effectiveness of the Apache's firepower has been celebrated.

So far though, in spite of its graphic nature, the film does not seem to have attracted much attention from the anti-war movement.

Looks like some outrage is in order!

but what are we supposed to say? "Gee, those poor Iraqis were just trying to kill American troops then BAM they get fired upon! How unjust!"

I know that it's more complicated then that. But if your going to be a pro-peace activist, you have to pick & choose your battles. Speaking out against this video is not something I have the energy to do right now.

This video does remind me of the book 1984, where the population is entertained by watching a boatload of refugees die. It's sick that there are people who find this kind of thing entertaining.

... carrying some sort of 'weapon' which one report characterized as a RPG. As the article stated:

Tony Sleep, a freelance photographer in the UK, was one recipient of the file. He was emailed a link to a US academic site that temporarily hosted the MPEG file.

"It's very uncomfortable to watch because it's so calculated," he told dotJournalism. "It's quite pornographic actually."

Yep, your analogy to 1984's scene is apt and is the basic for my outrage.

to make it look senseless? I saw the whole thing and it was the right thing to do.

I mean, the one guy was just on a tractor for crying out loud. I sure hope there is more to it that justifies the reaction.

The beginning of the footage shows the Apache tracking a truck on the highway, which stops and meets up with another truck which they suspect is carrying RPGs. Then you see one of the insurgants get out with an RPG launcher and go over to the guy on the tractor for a short bit before he goes back to the other truck. That's when they open fire. The whole thing is justified, it's war after all. And regardless of how against this war I am, I still want our boys to win the battles. I seriously doubt Poor Mr. Iraqi was going to use that RPG launcher to protect our soldiers' lives. They did what they had to do. And as far as the wounded guy goes, a truck just blew up in his face, shooting him was a mercy because no one was going to come save him, he would have suffered for a long time before dying.

If that's the whole story, our boys did the right thing.

If these are clearly Iraqi insurgents, then they're fair game under the current rules of engagement adopted by your government and mine in our behalf.

I don't support this war. But, nonetheless, I think this was an effective and legitimate use of firepower, provided--as I said--they were clearly identified as "enemy" combatants.

what the White House, Pentagon and State Dep't. say. Doesn't that automatically make EVERY Iraqi an 'enemy'? Oh, wait, I forgot...it's all about "pre-emptive" force. Silly me.
:eyes:

Don't make the soldiers the victims because this President decided to go to war for political reasons.

To do so makes the Democratic party look weak and abusive.

These young men and women signed up to defend this country and are obeying their orders. Please direct your anger toward President Bush and others who have apparently lied and deceived the American public into approving this war.

In a full-length review of the tape, a rocket launcher is visible on the tape.

--Brian

.

It was shown on ABC News. But this doesn't show the part where one guy pulls out an rpg from the truck and later drops it in the field. It is awful, but legitimate use of force.

wrapped in a cloth as an RPG. Does your TV set have an X-ray button?

Quite obvious, what do you think he had? A long pepperoni?

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

This is a legit strike from what I am seeing. Military hit on a military target.

that the killing of Saddams sons was an execution/assasination. Never mind that they were firing upon the troops.

was a bit of overkill, as it were, and that there may have been undeclared motives to prevent Udai and Qusay from having any opportunity to say ...uh, things.
:eyes:

Didn't it seem just a TAD bit strange that US troops had to keep firing and firing on that house until SH two kids were dead? We could have taken them alive with little or no resistance.

Whatsa matter Chimpy,afraid of what those two might have told the WORLD??

David

We could have taken them alive with little or no resistance.

That was attempted for an extended period of time. It failed and our soldiers were fired upon. Their response was appropriate.

sad that I have to share a big tent with people that defend those two pieces of shit that represent everything liberals used to be against. They were rich while others suffered, they were rapists, they treated the Iraqi population like toys sent for their enjoyment.

Yet they were seen as poor victims of the big bad US.

Give me a break. And you just wait I'll be called a freeper for writing this because lately anyone who doesn't join in on their military hate is immediately labeled a freeper.

an illegitimate war?

The video shows what appears to be a legitimate military strike. While uncomfortable and ugly, it is war. This isn't the type of war where the 2 sides are in trenches facing each other down across an open field. If the insurgents are identified as combatants, they are a legitimate target.

If you want to get pissed, get pissed at the pieces of shit that sent them over there. They are who is truely responsible. The soldiers are doing exactly what they were sent to do. If you want police actions, send a police force. The US military does not do police work.

Can't divulge how and where I saw it. The guys I saw it with were cheering like there was nothing wrong with doing it and one of them even remarked, this is the best video game ever!

What I saw was a military feed on to a guys computer. He had saved it to brag to people. It looked like we were watching from the inside of a helicopter or jet as they hunted down, one by one, people fleeing from buildings and a mosque. You could hear the guys in the helicopter talking about which buildings they could hit and which they couldn't. They identified for each other which building was the mosque, ("do not hit the mosque" - they said) and which buildings they could take out.

After they started shooting at a guy that walked toward a truck, some people started running from buildings and the mosque. The helicopters weren't shooting bullets like on this video - they were firing some kind of grenades and bombs. They would use about three or four of these bombs, for each person they killed. Somebody crawl under a truck, and boooom! Bomb hits the truck. The guys I was watching with were cheering -- "he's toast". They lapped it up as we watched several people killed one by one. Best video game ever.

At no time did it look like the helicopter was under fire. I'm not saying they didn't have a military reason for doing it. But from my vantage point, it looked like people down there just crawling around trying to survive, but getting blasted up. I don't believe they were all enemy unless you consider every Iraqi citizen an enemy. Of course, I admit that I could be wrong, but... If you saw the whole thing from when they were calmly setting targets, then opening the carnage, and the way that it did look like a video game, the little people running and crawling and the trace of bombs toward them. It was surreal.

If it's what you are describing, I think it's the video from a C-130 Spectre gunship. It circled an identified Al Queda/Taliban hideout and opened fire once receiving clearance from HQ.

Those animals are the ones who killed thousands of innocent Americans in New York.

I remember something happening in New York on September 11, 2001.

I saw that one too.

My opinions of that video are the same as of this video.

graphic then that one. I'm glad its not in color.

No question about that is there?

My question is, since the USA liberated Iraq why are 130,000 troops still occupying Iraq?

I saw on TV that Bremmer is now advocating begging the UN to step in. Seems that the US Regime is desperate now to get out by July, so the Iraq debacle won't be a big part of the re-election drama.

Especially to your last sentence.

I don't think we should even be in Iraq, but these guys were perceived to be a threat to American forces during a time of war, and they had to be eliminated. Period. It's sad, but this is what happens in war.

sad to see but as they always say in war it is either kill or be killed.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

The soldier in the video identified the man down as being wounded then ordered to have him killed or shall I say murdered.

And that is a war crime under several international treaties including the Geneva convention.

You can buff this up under the guise of 'support the troops' or 'war is hell' but the bottom line is, in my opinion, whomever made that order to kill that injured man should be standing in front of an international court of law and facing charges for War Crimes.

The evidence is very clear and has been recorded. The victim was even identified as being wounded.

But this will never happen. Bush has made it almost impossible for US military officials and soldiers to be charged with crimes of war by using economic and political force on other nations around the world, leveraging promises not to charge Americans.

Nice "Get out of Jail Free" card. It's a new class of warriors - ones' that don't have to be held accountable for their actions.

I know about this incident.
Although disturbing, it should be noted that these Iraqi insurgents had just previously attacked an American convey during a nighttime raid, with small arms fire and RPG's. The men in the image stopped several miles before an American security checkpoint to ditch their weapons used in the attack. Unknown to them, after their attack on our boys and innocent Iraqi citizens, American Army aviation forces tracked their movements using FLIR on three AH64D Apache Longbow attack helicopters.
Further, the convoy was allegedly carrying medical supplies and sustenance for Iraqi civilians and American support troops in need. The convoy was defended minimally and our men suffered injuries in the attack.

but anything we do in this country is illegal. From the audio 'our' men made a comment that he had missed his target, then went in for the overkill. Not in my name.