Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you had been in George W Bush's shoes in January of 2001...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 08:57 PM
Original message
If you had been in George W Bush's shoes in January of 2001...?
What would you have done to "unite" the country? Knowing that you were sitting in the WH because there was a "friendly" Supreme Court decision and that you had actually lost the popular vote to your opponent? Knowing also that many people were very angry and untrusting of their government after the Supreme Court decision? What would you have done differently from George W Bush? What actions could you have done to show the people that you were going to be a president for all the people and not just some special interests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd start a bit before that,
with a selection of Al Gore for Secretary of State, and a considerable number of Democrats for the cabinet, trying to make it 50-50...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree
I'd have tried, as much as partisanship would allow, to create what would amount to a coalition government. I'd have balanced my cabinet 50/50 with both parties and appealed to the legislature to try to place America's national interest over partisanship. Then, I would start dodging the gunshots that would come from my corporate sponsors' hired assassins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would have stepped down
I would have gone on TV and said: "ya know, Gore actualy won this thing...I cannot tell a lie. I quit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yep.
Me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That would have been what a man of honor would have done.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregorStocks Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Step one: buy a gun.
Step two: Complete this step.
Step three: Attempt to attend my own funeral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. can you imagine this guy jumping up and down, saying ....
'last week, I couldn't even spell "prezadunt" and today I are one.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. well, 50-50 cabinets wouldn't work.
leaks happen, and with a 50-50 cabinet, fault lines would create naturally and leaks would create ruptures.

bush did keep mineta (transportation) on board, so there was a token democrat. maybe so they wouldn't have a republican in that position to catch blame for 9/11. :tinfoilhat:


anyway, it's not people, it's policy. the key to gaining genuine credibility as a bipartisan president is to actually reach into the other party's agenda and pull out something worthwhile. bush pretended to do this in texas (he proudly put his name on bills and loudly touted victories when his own vetos were overridden).

but what's been so partisan about this administration is both the single-minded pursuit of extreme republican agenda and the virulent attacks on any hint of disagreement.

the best the offer is to pry away a few votes from the most conservative of democrats.

this is NOT the stuff of bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manfriend Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He kept the CIA director
Bush kept Clinton's CIA chief as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. even before then ...
As soon as the election was deadlocked, I would have sat down with my opponent and had a good long talk about what we would do, "for the sake of the country".

There would be a joint TV appearance the next day, where we would announce that there would be recounts. I would also ask my brother to recuse himself from politicking in Florida, and my opponent and I would a) ask the US Supreme Court to advise us on procedures to allow the current President to remain in office past Jan 20th 2001, if necessary; and b) call for an independent inquiry into the goings-on in Florida, with a revote if necessary.


Whatever the outcome, the result would be a mixed Cabinet (with the runner-up probably being offered a post). It would be a new kind of government ... no month-long vacations for me, I would be spending weekends going around to various places trying to reassure my constituents that I wasn't trying to break up the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC