Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: debate transcripts INCLUDING "bush* is a deserter" inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 01:49 AM
Original message
WP: debate transcripts INCLUDING "bush* is a deserter" inquiry
Edited on Fri Jan-23-04 01:51 AM by amen1234
General Clark, a lot of people say they don't you well, so this is really a simple question about knowing a man by his friends. The other day you had a rally here, and one of the men who stood up to endorse you is the controversial filmmaker Michael Moore. You said you were delighted with him.

At one point, Mr. Moore said, in front of you, that President Bush --he's saying he'd like to see you, the general, and President Bush, who he called a "deserter."

Now, that's a reckless charge not supported by the facts. And I was curious to know why you didn't contradict him, and whether or not you think it would've been a better example of ethical behavior to have done so.

CLARK: Well, I think Michael Moore has the right to say whatever he feels about this.

CLARK: I don't know whether this is supported by the facts or not. I've never looked at it. I've seen this charge bandied about a lot.

But to me it wasn't material. This election is going to be about the future, Peter. And what we have to do is pull this country together. And I am delighted to have the support of a man like Michael Moore, of a great American leader like Senator George McGovern, and of people from Texas like Charlie Stenholm and former Secretary of the Navy John Dalton.

We've got support from across the breadth of the Democratic Party, because I believe this party is united in wanting to change the leadership in Washington. We're going to run an election campaign that's about the future. We're going to hold the president accountable for what he did in office and failed to do, and we're going to compare who's got the best vision for America.

JENNINGS: Let me ask you something you mentioned, then, because since this question and answer in which you and Mr. Moore was involved in, you've had a chance to look at the facts.

Do you still feel comfortable with the fact that someone should be standing up in your presence and calling the president of the United States a deserter?

CLARK: To be honest with you, I did not look at the facts, Peter. You know, that's Michael Moore's opinion. He's entitled to say that. I've seen -- he's not the only person who's said that. I've not followed up on those facts. And frankly, it's not relevant to me and why I'm in this campaign.

JENNINGS: OK, thank you, sir.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A39875-2004Jan22_3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. a great line for Jennings question-
"Do you still feel comfortable with the fact that someone should be standing up in your presence and calling the president of the United States a deserter? "

Hey, if the boot fits, wear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. slightly off?
sleep deprivation speaking here? or a little of both -

"Do you still feel comfortable with the fact that someone should be standing up in your presence and calling the president of the United States a deserter? "

not could or would, but should.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Amazing that a journalist would ask such a question.
The question of whether or not Moore's statement is actually *true* seems completely inconsequential. It's only a matter of manners, or propriety. It's Amazing.

Clark should've said as much. He should've asked whether these men consider themselves journalists or etiquette teachers. Their job isn't to decide which questions cannot be asked, but rather to ferret out the facts.

He should've asked them if the charges are true. Since they apparently consider it improper to say Bush was AWOL, surely they can prove the charge to be baseless. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Jennings did us a great service by bringing the "desserter" issue up
put it out there all across America....now all the repukes and swing voters have heard it!!!!....I LOVE IT...WONDERFUL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. But he also dismisses it at once
"Now, that's a reckless charge not supported by the facts."

So his question came across as "Moor is a liar. Why do you let him lie when supporting you?"

Not a good way of attacking Bush, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think Clark gave a good answer and I'm glad Jennings brought it up.
I think Clark gave a good answer and I'm glad Jennings brought it up.

Maybe Jennings thought he was undermining Clark, but I think in the long run this question may undermine George W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Locking
Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

...

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC