Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concerning Bush's reactions on and responses to the "incidents" of Sept 11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:58 PM
Original message
Concerning Bush's reactions on and responses to the "incidents" of Sept 11
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 12:57 AM by Valerie5555
2001.

Who was bothered and who was not surprised, that during the "incidents" and "terrorist emergency" of September 11, 2001 that Bush ran off like a "chickenpoop" while New York burned.


Count me in the "not surprised at all camp," for after those incidents happened, I even made up my own version of "The Yellow Shrub Of Texas," though that was about a year after the incidents of September 11 2001.

On edit, I wondered if anyone was all the more unnerved or bothered by Bushie's or *'s actions had then New York Mayor Guiliani had to be AWML or Absent With Medical Leave (for don't forget, he also survived prostatic cancer) and he could have had to have all sorts of medical appointments on that day.

On double edit, I also wondered how many others were also bothered by how Bush or * seemed to leave the United States "high and dry" in the leadership department, especially when it counted, when he especially, is supposed to be the one in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
puerco-bellies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I used to think it was fear..
Now I believe that he dodged across the heartland because of guilt and what he, if he was a mature adult, would recognized as remorse. He ran from the horror that he committed, in order not to internalize the magnitude of his crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh ho !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So it was shame, mortification, or
embarrassment or :blush: at what he'd allowed to transpire that caused him to run off like that.


Need an emoticon or "smilie" for "embarrassed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. An interesting anecdote
I was in a job that required me to "miss" most of the TV coverage that day despite being in an affected city. When I did catch some coverage I honestly thought that the President* was a hostage. I quickly learned that he was giving some sort of statement from an AFB in Louisiana (I was told that at any rate). He was slumped in a chair, mumbling about "folks" that did the bombings and looked frightened.

Imagine my surprise later when I realized that:
a. this was his "reassurance" of the country
b. within two days this all would be called "masterful"

I thought he looked pathetic then. I thought he was worthless in a crisis and I NEVER was among those who "rallied" to him. It was the last straw for me with that guy. Everything since has been more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bet you liked Clinton all the more when you learned that
he actually beat Bushie to NY by about 2 days or so, even though he was out of the country at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah...
I've pretty much had the same reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So you thought if he had the guts he would have been
"Johnny on the spot" in New York or at least Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Unless there was a damn good reason
Yes, I expected him to return to DC---not the chaos of NYC that day because large scale rescue thought to initially be needed and order needed to be returned (not a fancy disruptive visit by his majesty). But, returning to the WH: YES, I did expect that. That would have equalled Clinton's showing up first in NYC. Or, at least it would have shown some control of the situtaion and concern for Americans. Instead the coward hid out.

What I despised was the craven way he ran around the country, lied about the reason and pathetically mumbled through some appearance enroute like a hostage. That he did not do any thing useful and then stood on the very graves of the lost in New York and crowed like the banty rooster he is was and is still: disgraceful.

Always was a coward, always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. So, you no doubt found the "outraged ambassador" number on the part of
President Clinton when the Oklahoma City Federal Building was bombed, more reassuring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. And to think the real hostages like those in Iran seemed more Presidential
than he is. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC