|
(her response to my e-mail is found in this link)
Hello, I work for the DoD (V Corp) in Germany. Here on base many military dependents with deployed spouses have spoken of the dire needs of the troops in Iraq. They have been sending care packages of their own via husbands' APO addresses, and co-workers are using those addresses to send packages containing supplies--many listed on your website--as well. These spouses do this out of desperation for their husbands' welfare, who suffer greatly on their never-ending tour of duty (complete with promises of leave made and then broken), not out of a need to fulfill feelings of patriotism, as you had mentioned in "Stars and Stripes." Many of these spouses have seen their husbands, on average, less than six months out of the last two years, and they receive phone calls maybe once a week for 15 minutes or less. Mail is sporadic, at best. Their children think Daddy has ditched the family, and military marriages are crumbling. I hope you are not suggesting that it is "unpatriotic" not to want your spouse to be sent away for a year or more with little to no contact, perhaps to die, or to question why the troops are still in Iraq if their mission has been "accomplished" as President Bush has stated. "We are terrified" is what the spouses are hearing from their loved ones. They send care packages to their husbands' companies to let them know we have not forgotten them as their morale hits rock-bottom. Supporting the troops by sending them supplies does not equate to supporting their presence in the region. I think those distinctions tend to get muddled with confusion over what is "patriotic" and what isn't. By the way, if Americans on low incomes can support the troops financially, why can't President Bush, who has access to the most heavily financed government organization (Department of Defense) in the history of the world? I would like to support your mission financially, though you are likely to find my motives "unpatriotic."
|