The movie critic in the movie section, and a regular columnist
with a full-page color spread on Page 3 (usually reserved for
babes - it is a GOP tabloid rag, after all).
Anyway, they hate it with a capital H.
----
Here is the movie critics piece, which is accessible for free at:
http://theedge.bostonherald.com/movieReviews/edgeMovies.bg?articleid=262Pulp scripture: Gruesome violence eclipses message of Gibson's `Christ'Review by James Verniere
Tuesday, February 24, 2004
I've never before reviewed a film reportedly directed by the Holy Spirit and given a thumbs-up by both the Pope and Roger Ebert. But there's a first time for everything. Mel Gibson's ``The Passion of the Christ'' - the subject of months of controversy and debate - is
the gospel according to Mad Max. Remarkably brutal and often stomach-churning, it is easily one of the most violent films I have ever seen, a full-length version of the torture sequence in ``Braveheart.'' If it had been about any other subject, it would have been rated NC-17.
As most Christians know, the apostles Matthew, Mark, Luke and John have amazingly little to say about the specifics of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ in the Bible. ``The Passion'' is derived in large part from the Passion plays performed for more than 300 years in Europe, which have a troubling legacy of anti-Semitism. The film also has roots in ``The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ,'' a minutely detailed, violent 1833 account of the torture and murder of Jesus based on visions of 19th-century German Catholic nun Anne Catherine Emmerich, who is known to have also been an anti-Semite. ``The Passion of the Christ'' is not an anti-Semitic film, but anti-Semites are likely to feel justified by it.
<end snip>
This guy lays it out, as does the other columnist.
arendt