Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you want Ken Lay to be charged and convicted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NoMoreRedInk Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:40 PM
Original message
Do you want Ken Lay to be charged and convicted?
Are you glad Martha Stewart was charged and convicted?


If the answers to both of those questions are not the same, then why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. HELL YES I want Key Lay charged and convicted!
More so than Martha Stewart. She is small time compared to what he did. And he is getting off scott free!

Bernie Ebbers (Tyco) was indicted yesterday. That's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoMoreRedInk Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bernie Ebbers is WorldCom, not Tyco. It's so hard to keep them...
straight these days.

I don't believe scale matters with these crimes. Guilty is guilty. The entire system is built on confidence, and small frauds carry much the same hurt as the big frauds.

I think they should all sit and think about it in a concrete cell for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I stand corrected.
There was some other Tyco scandal - can't recall right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. You're thinking of Dennis Kozlowski
Story HERE -- another one who used their company's treasury for a piggybank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. charged & convicted...tarred & feathered...drawn & quartered...
...but realistically, there is a difference - tho' it's mostly just a matter of degree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, Yes, Yes....I am not happy that Martha Stewart was convicted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is a massive difference
Many experts believe that Martha may well have not committed any financial crime. She was not charged with insider trading but with having lied to the FBI to cover up her activities. The irony here is that the cover up may well have been the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoMoreRedInk Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Martha was not charged with insider trading because they
couldn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. It is a difficult charge to prove.

Martha obviously thought she committed a financial crime, or she wouldn't have lied about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicRic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I wonder if Martha was a repug contributer...
if this case would ever even been brought up .I strongly believe this was one of the reasons they went after her. What Ken Lay did ,affected the lives of many people ,and detroyed many lives ! Yet he walks around free from any charges ! Its a disgrace the way the media in this country no longer investigates things like this. We are startnig to become more like cold war era USSR , with a goverment run news media ! Iam so upset at the direction our country is going in since the 2000 coup. After 8 years of prosperity under Clinton , almost all of his hard work has been wiped out ! FYI> bushes I.Q. 91 Clintons I.Q. 182 ! I guess that explains alot ! I'm a H.S. grad,no other education and my I.Q was evaluated at 126 ! There is no way bush did not cheat his way thru Havard ! On the other hand Clinton was a road scholar, bush is mentally challenged ! What is the most disappointing is the educated people supporting this idiot ! It all comes down to their greed ,they would vote for a monkey if it promised tax cuts, OH thats right ,they already did,HeHE,LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeG5385 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. If it's good enough for Martha, it's good enough for Ken
By the way, I think Martha got screwed. She should never have been convicted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. For every penny Martha saved in an early trade, Kenny made $100,000...
and yet for every minute Kenny was in the news, Martha was on an hour. Now, why do you suppose that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. maybe because Kenny boy hasn't been charged and tried yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Here's a good cartoon..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. At the very least
I want to see Ken Lay be charged and face a jury.

Martha had to face a jury, she was convicted, she will have her time to appeal.

At the very least Ken Lay deserves the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
35. Welcome to DU Kadie...
:hi:

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. I want him charged and tried...
It is up to a jury to convict or acquit him.
let the system work EQUALLY for all crooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. I want him To Rot In Hell

And he can take Georgie Porgie with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Tarred and feathered is my choice.
Martha was nonpolitical. No sympathy here, but she learned a lesson: Big money to the GOP, or you are on your own. Wonder what Kenny Boy's butler served him for dinner tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wings_of_shadows Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. So it appears
I was pleased that she was charged, and elated that she was convicted. The icon she has established for herself represents another over-charging corporation that leaves hometown, local business owners on streets without jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. So how is "Kenny Boy" donating to Jr. campagin?...diverting it somehow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. Murder I
Remember Ken Baxter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hammie Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. It depends.
If there is probable cause, then I want him charged and tried. If a jury of his peers finds that there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, I want him convicted.

Am I glad Martha was convicted? No. I don't rejoice in her decision to engage in criminal behavior, nor does her downfall in anyway make me happier or more fortunate. It does please me that those people and agencies charged with discovering and prosecuting criminal misbehavior in the financial markets did their job and forced Martha to face the music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. They couldn't hold the trial in California
You couldn't find twelve people in the entire state willing to acquit the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. Oh. Hell. Yes.
Ken Lay and pals ruined lives. They ruined businesses. They gutted a large state's budget. Their actions led to the unseating of a duly elected Democratic governor.

Ken Lay is walking around a free man, enjoying his ill-gotten gains.

I would feel a lot better about Martha Stewart's conviction if Ken Lay were already serving time.

As it is I am left to conclude that Martha was convicted of being a highly successful female with an unpleasant personality. I think she undoubtedly did what she was accused of. I am not now and never have been one of her devotees.

BUT the phrase "no one is above the law" rings hollow while Ken Lay et al. are still free. I am left to conclude that they are highly successful males with personalities that mesh with others in very high places. The whole thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speed8098 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. What about * and Harken???????
I think it sucks that Martha Stewart goes to jail while this jackass in the White House get's a pass on everything.

Martha came away with about $40,000.00, * came away with over $800,000.00. Why hasn't he been charged?

* makes me want to :puke:
Ken Lay makes me want to :puke:

As you can see, I've been :puke:ing alot lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. whatever happened to "Kenny boy" anyhow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes to Ken Lay. Martha...whatever
She wasn't convicted of insider trading, but rather lying about it. That might be important in terms of prosecuting the others. If so, I'm all for it. I really don't care one way or the other about whether she goes to jail, though. If she does, it'll be a prison that's a vast improvement in lifestyle over that of a lot of the population. I'm for putting Ken Lay in a real prison - you know, one without a tennis court - if he's convicted, but that won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. Martha Stewart was persecuted for $40,000
I think her sentence is unduly harsh, and you have to ask why so much federal money went into prosecuting her versus Ken Lay or some other of the big boys. I do think they wanted to make an example of Martha because she was a strong, successful businesswomen. That she gave money to Democratic causes and is friends with Hillary Clinton didn't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. as long as they are guilty!
"Do you want Ken Lay to be charged and convicted?"

If he is guilty, then it is altogether fitting and proper that he be charged and convicted.

"Are you glad Martha Stewart was charged and convicted?"

If she was guilty, then it is altogether fitting and proper that she be charged and convicted.

"If the answers to both of those questions are not the same, then why not?"

They are different because Martha Stweart is a female, whereas Ken Lay is a male. For that reason, I inserted an 's' before the 'he' in the case of Martha Stweart, as is customary in the English Language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
29. The scope of their injury has a bearing on the depth of my
feelings on this. I felt little loss or harm done when MS lied about her stupid mess, but she did cause her stockholders lots of grief. People all over Texas were losing their jobs, health insurance, and retirement because of Kenny Boy.

The MS case was overkill, no doubt. But I sure wish they'd get KL locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. just to be contrary i'll say NO
if he refunds the pension monies out of his ill-gotten fortune he can stay in aruba eating grapes fed to him off the bush family bible by steroid using teenage thai hookers procured by neil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. FOR WHAT?!? Does anybody on this thread even have a credible charge???
I see a lot of "I want Kenny Boy charged and tried," "I want Kenny Boy charged and convicted," etc. But the interesting thing is that there is never a direct charge attached to that. "I want Kenny Boy charged with X crime." WTF do you people want him charged with? What offense? Please provide a specific fact pattern that would justify the charge under federal law.

One person here wants Ken Lay charged with first-degree murder in the death of Clifford Baxter. Ohhhhhhhhhhh-kay. However ridiculous such a charge is given the evidence we have and the minimum standards for such a charge, at least this person named an actual charge.

What fucking charge are you people talking about who want him charged?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. I want Kenny Boy pardoned. Seriously. Here's why.
1. It would be the last nail in Smirk's coffin.

2. Somebody who lost their life savings in Enron's 401k would no doubt put him in the graveyard, and, as Martha would say, "That's a good thing."

3. These greedy bastards don't fear jail. Let them fear death, with Kenny as the Poster Boy.

I'm all for class warfare. Let's just make it a real war.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. want Lay charged, convicted, and boiled in his own oil
How many people had their lives shredded by the frauds committed by ENRON officials?

How about old folks had to shut down air conditioning during the heat wave in Calif while ENRON was playing fast and loose with the grid so they could steal the state blind? Were there any heat related deaths during those fraudulent blackouts? That would be manslaughter if any regular joe did it.

Martha, what a $60,000 profit from stock sale? Judge tossed out one of the charges.

ENRON, Skilling/Lay: Billions in assets down the tubes after they sold their stock and still hyped it to employees.

Hell, yes, we wanna see Lay in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
34. Without reading the previous posts...
Edited on Sat Mar-06-04 12:06 PM by rasputin1952
I want Ken Lay tried fairly, and if he is guilty, convicted. While I hold my own view of his guilt, it is not up to me to suppose he is guilty, that is why we have courts and trials.

I know this may sound trivial in the scheme of things, but the way you framed your question, is why I responded in this manner. We are a nation of laws, and I have sat on juries. I have always tried to keep an open mind during the trial, and deal with the evidence provided, and the defense's arguments against said evidence.

If I betray that ideology, I am going against my core belief in justice.

With that said, if Lay is found guilty, I think his assets should be seized and distributed to those he defrauded. If guilty, he should spend whatever time in prison the court deems appropriate. Some laws would have to be changed to seize assets, but that is a viable option and worthy of support by all fair minded individuals. Where is the justice if those defrauded are left destitute, while government entities are beneficiaries of fines and levies?

O8)

on edit: I've read the previous posts now, and I am glad to see that there are a fair amount of those that want him tried for a crime, but have not convicted him yet, (at least not posting about that). It shows me there is hope for a country that claims it is based on the value of law. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yes, get all the white collar crooks
regardless of political party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Fuckin-A RIGHT, I want him charged and convicted!
I want the same standards applied to Kenny-Boy that were used against Martha Stewart.

I want the same goddamn chains that Starr used on Susan McDougal to be used on Kenny-Boy.

Time for the Perp Walk, Kenny!

:bounce:
dbt

(Note to Sandra Day O'Connor: you'd look SO SEXY in shackles!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC