Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When's the last time a sitting pResident was this far behind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 06:51 PM
Original message
When's the last time a sitting pResident was this far behind
this early? Any precendents for overcoming that kind of lead? My general impresion is that whenever somebody was in this much trouble this early, they tended to be forced onto the long defensive trail and to ultimately lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't trust polls now. To win, we have to run believing Kerry's behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Agree that we can't get complacent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush the First's poll numbers were pretty low about this time
in his term, weren't they? I remember that he wasn't very popular all through 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think Bush I was even further behind, but I don't remember the numbers
I do remember that Bush I's team kept saying that the numbers meant nothing, that November was a long way away, that Bush would win in a landslide, etc....

Maybe Bush II's advisors are equally in the dark.

This family has a remarkable ability for delusional thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bush II's advisors were inherited from Poppy Bush
and they've adequately demonstrated they have no learning curve in most matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Inherited yes, but wiser.
How many times have you heard that GW won't make the same mistakes his daddy did.

Keep you're eyes open and your head down! INCOMING!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. But he's is making the same mistakes only he's added
brazen theft and cheating to his arsenal. Poppy liked to create the illusion that he was an affable old doffer, regardless of how black his heart was. I think #2 is more rash and arrogant and that will be his downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Wiser?
Last time, they knew better than to try "regime change" in Iraq.
They've gotten stupider since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Poppy was NOT further behind in 1992
In fact, he was still ahead of Clinton. Remember, Clinton was a bloody mess coming out of the primaries. Kerry's in infinitely better shape. There's no comparison. I don't believe any incumbent since Gallup began polling has ever been this far behind at this point in the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is just being a weird goddam year
and I don't trust anything, particularly the polls, but the Bushies and their abettors (e.g. Fux Noose) seem intent on pumping the numbers, and it just doesn't seem to work anym,ore. One GD thread showed 2 polls that had Kerry leading Bush by 2:1, and one of these polls was in an obscure W. Va. paper.

Of course, I would have bet a lot that Dean would be our nominee, too, so I don't give my own fortunetelling skills much credence either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nixon probably, but they didn't start keeping track until 8/72, I believe.
Nixon, incidentally, won on a strategy of making hatred of him the dominant theme, and then changing things about himself, which people hated (Vietnam and the draft) and leaving Democrtats with nothing by which to define themselves in the General Election.

I think they're trying to repeat that strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. According to Gallup
No incumbent who has been trailing at this point has won since Harry Truman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. They don't have numbers for Nixon because Dems didn't get their nominee...
...until very late in 72 (iirc).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Nixon Numbers:
Edited on Mon Mar-08-04 07:26 PM by Melinda
Here

Nixon:

3/03-05/72 Gallup 56 32 12 1513
3/24-27/72 Gallup 53 36 11 1514
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. defensive is the key word.
you're right on... keep * on the defensive. if kerry falls into the defensive trap he loses, we lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. The definitive past Presidential polling site:
Edited on Mon Mar-08-04 07:29 PM by Melinda
Roper Center

*edited cause I'm an idiot today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kerry wire to wire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrocks Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. We are going to hit with 200 million dollar stink bomb
This campaign will be impossible to predict-we will have instant Osama soon plus they may cut open strategic oil reserve to cut gas prices this summer plus every corporate welfare junkie will do what it takes to make sure the candy man is recrowned-it is going to be nasty but if Kerry's rapid response team keeps working we may keep the polls this way in Nov. Isn't it scary it is this close after seeing shrub run the usa for 3 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrocks Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. sorry we are going to Get hit with 200 million dollar GOP stink bomb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Carter, Ford, Bush the elder
• In March 1972, Richard Nixon had an approval rating of 53%. In the general election eight months later, he crushed George McGovern, winning 64% of the vote.

• In May 1984, Ronald Reagan had an approval rating of 52%. That November he went on to win reelection with 58% of the vote, garnering 525 electoral votes.

• In March 1996, Bill Clinton had an approval rating of 52%. In November he easily defeated Bob Dole.

The three incumbent presidents who lost their re-election bids, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and the elder Bush, had lower approval ratings. In March 1976 Mr. Ford's was about 48%, in March 1980 Mr. Carter's was around 39% and in March 1992 Mr. Bush's was about 41%.

http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/3817.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. If Kerry stops Diebold - Chimp will lose biggest landslide in history!
The entire Repuke party could be left in tatters after this wipe out! A hard rain's a gonna fall here folks! Look for MANY terror alerts in the upcoming months!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't think terror alerts will work any more.
Everybody remembers the duct tape.

That color system was the most botched up campaign ever devised. First, nobody really remembered what calor meant what; second, AFAIK none of the colors was associated with any specific recommended or required action. And third, they repeatedly used it as a distraction device with such cynical timing that they turned it into a joke.

Unfortunately for them, this bunch of clowns doesnt't seem funny anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC