|
Okay, as far as I'm concerned, organized religions can be as backwards and exclusionary and disrespectful all they want. Gay people be damned, that's fine by me - organized religion can get by on the "tithes" of the mindless robots they call their "congregation". Government should not force them to do anything, they need to wake up for themselves and treat EVERYBODY with respect.
But the government sure as hell should not disallow a civil union, "marriage", or any other form of equal rights status against homosexuals. Otherwise it is discrimination or worse.
And we, the homosexuals, need to show everybody we can be in serious relationships as well. That's part of the problem and it is not based on stereotype whatsoever.
We can't change everybody's minds, but we sure as hell can make sure we look so comparatively respectable that the actions of the people against us end up looking like the disgraceful troublemakers.
Is it really the acts we do (namely the yucky anal sex) that make us reviled? Or the fact that many gay men prefer the promiscuity and random acts of casual sex, which understandably is the basis for lots of slander against all homosexuals? I say it's the latter becuase, from what I've seen, the homophobes use the "inability to form partnerships and prefer promiscuity" argument FAR, FAR more often than naming any specific act.
Just my two cents, and if you're offended, good. Now you know for one post how I feel on a CONSTANT basis. Does it feel good when somebody bashes you, please note I'm still trying to be even slightly civil?
|