Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who thinks the US blew up the train in Spain?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:35 PM
Original message
Who thinks the US blew up the train in Spain?
specifically , who thinks the ROVE machine created the scenario to take the heat off Bush and the bad press hes been getting, PLUS the fact he hasnt got a goddamn issue to run on except for KEEPING THE US IN TERROR

Already the news whores like Wolf are playing it like a cheap whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HalfManHalfBiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a chance
Rove isn't that stupid.

WAY too much risk with no solid benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. no way, we might have known that it was about to happen but we
didnt do it, does that make us complicit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. No. It could be ETA ( I doubt it, not w/o some help)
anyway. It could be Al Qeada.

Bush is a rat, but not responsible for everything.

Did we blow up our embassies in Africa? Did we blow up the USS Cole?

Have we a figured out a way to blame Bush for those?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
86. They are desparate and they have gotten away with most everything thus far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
153. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
egalois Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #153
156. THIS IS ANTI-GAY HATRED!
How DARE you impugn Sullivan's gayness just because you disagree with him! Would you refer to Jesse Jackson by the N-word if he took a position contrary to yours? We need REAL progressives on this site, not haters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
163. Thanks,
Edited on Sun Mar-14-04 12:28 AM by secondtermdenier
to you and others below who expressed similar opinions. I was checking out the Andrew Sullivan site (I check out tons of sites, and sometimes even leave my residence and talk to people who have opinions I don't share), saw the link to this thread and groaned. If I thought conspiracy threads like this were what this site was all about, I wouldn't be here. Also, someone at Free Republic is asking, no doubt enviously, about the emoticons on this thread! :scared: :nuke: :hi: :thumbsup: :wow: :spank: :boring: :hurts: :nopity: :argh: :wtf: :think: :mad: :hippie: :evilgrin: }( :P :toast: :loveya: :headbang: Just a taste, baby. You know you want more. Maybe not everyone has seen this old article on the damage these distracting conspiracy theories can do http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12536 ? There's enough real stuff to focus on. By the way, what do people think: when Limbaugh, Sullivan, or whoever posts these links to our most embarrassing threads, should we flood the threads with terrible articles and information about them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not me
I'm a suspicious SOB but that's a little out there...

Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I honestly don't believe they're that clever.
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 05:38 PM by BurtWorm
I have some teeny tiny doubts about whether they're that evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They killed over 20,000 Iraqi civilians for petes sake in Iraq
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 05:41 PM by Mari333
remember Shock and Awe? and they killed over 600 soldiers or more and wounded and maimed thousands for PNAC

Id say YA THEY ARE THAT EVIL.

REMEMBER THEY DID THIS

http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
131. There's banal evil and satanic evil.
They're banally evil. It would take satanic evil to murder civilians of allies to convince Americans to vote for them in the general election. Stupid satanic evil, on top of that. Why not just murder Americans for that purpose?

But I wouldn't put it past them to try to exploit a tragedy of someone else's making in an effort to keep themselves in power. They've done that over and over. And that is the banality of their evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #131
184. I think they did murder Americans...
...on 911.

Let's skip the hair-splitting. Evil is evil no matter how you try to dice and slice it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Oh, I'll buy the evil
But don't see a strong enough motive. I could, however, maybe see them planting the Al Qaeda connection after the fact.

FLASH!! Jackpine Rejects First Tinfoil Theory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
78. They already did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
137. really, how much intelligence would it require?
Edited on Fri Mar-12-04 02:04 AM by rman
it's not like it's difficult to come up with such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. The thought crossed my mind
Not enough detail known.

it is convenient for the Bush admin and comes at a time when they are sinking. it has the political effect of making people scared so that they feel compelled to vote for Bush for "protection".

And just what exactly is "Al Queda"? Is it really that well organized and defined?

Is it really just the equivalent of "the struggle" in black america's long struggle for justice? i.e. a generic term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapauvre Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
158. Uh, well
It crosses my mind as well. I have become such a cynic. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nope
I don't believe that for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. No
no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
outinforce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not For One Second
Honestly, how do you think it will look in the media if someone were to say "Democratic WebSite Thinks US Behind Madrid Bombing"?

Are you trying to damage our party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. This website was the first to call out PNAC and the lies
surrounding the illegal occupation of Iraq and the illegal war and the mystery surrounding 9/11 and LIHOP and MIHOP..
damage the party? Its time people started asking hard questions about everything that happens, and stop acting like the GOP machine isnt capable, right now, of the worst atrocities imaginable in an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. LIHOP and MIHOP conspiracy mongers
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 05:50 PM by mobuto
are shameful exercises in collective derangement that embarass this website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. absolute acceptance of what the admin says is an embarrassment..
been in a coma the last 3 years? Evidently you're perfectly content with the ever changing popular theory of 911 rather than doing any critical research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. well said, frylock
Some people are so bound up with not being a "conspiracy theorist" that they ignore pretty much all of human history.

Had this attitude been prevalent so many things would never have been uncovered:

Watergate
COINTELPRO
Tuskeegee Experiments
Operation Paperclip
MK-ULTRA (CIA mind control program)

more...

All well established historic fact, now.

All ridiculed as wacky "conspiracy theories" at the time.

Maybe that person is right and Watergate just never happened but was the feverish construct of Wacky Conpiracy Theorists.

Feh. I've got little patience for uneducated people such as that person who have little regard for the teachings of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Absolute acceptance of what the administration says
is stupid. Believing that anyone other than 19 of Osama bin Laden's henchmen was responsible for 9/11 is infinitely more stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. well.. you can't argue against facts like that..
great argument. Kudos to you mobuto, kudos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. How can I respond to a non-argument?
Where's the beef, Charlie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
174. Maybe you should tell us where the beef is located...
...since you've been harping on the same discredited lines of thought for quite some time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
89. Muslim terrorist conspiracy monger. Disgusting!
I guess we can all play that little game. Who's conspirarcy theory makes more sense, as the White House is going into contortions to prevent an investigation into 9-11??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #89
120. I'm sorry
Islamist terrorists are responsible for 9/11. That's an established fact. This is not debatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #120
122. Link please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #120
154. Again, link please?
Even the newspapers say "alleged" mastermind of 911 when they refer to OBL. If you can find me some real evidence about what took place on 911 I will be forever grateful.

When I hear people talk about conspiracy theorist, I think about how much of a stretch it takes to believe the scenario of what we've been told about the events of 911. Now, *that's* a conspiracy theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #120
176. That's an outright lie, and you know it....
FBI Admits: No Evidence Links 'Hijackers' to 9-11
The possibility that 19 Muslim men accused of being the Sept. 11 hijackers were not, in fact, the hijackers, is not so extraordinary an idea as it might seem.

<http://www.americanfreepress.net/051302/FBI_Admits__No_Evidence_/fbi_admits__no_evidence_.html>

Excerpt:

"In an April 19 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, 'left no paper trial.' The FBI director stated flatly:

'In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere—that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot.'"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not gullible Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #89
147. Same bastards behind this!
As with 911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #147
178. So, tell us where all of this evidence resides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #89
168. So people that believe...
Islamic terrorists were behind 9/11 are "Muslim terrorist conspiracy mongerers"?

:wtf:

This is nonsense. How much Osama himself had part in the planning of 9/11 is somewhat of a mystery to me, and I definetely don't buy this administration's story entirely, but I think there is more than enough evidence to suggest that Islamist extremist terrorists were behind 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #168
177. What might that evidence be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. rolling over and accepting anything that comes from this admin..
is what is damaging the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoDoYouTrust Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. amen, again, Toots!
Some people believe everything they are fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #63
105. About damn time
I saw you here again! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoDoYouTrust Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #105
126. I'm still here!
Sometimes I just get riled and have to post!

:loveya:

Glad to read you got a new job!

Jude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
88. Funny. Any particular reason why they wouldn't do it since they are the
most likely to benefit? I see a lot of "No"s but no reasons as to why. These people have proved over and over that they do not intend to give up their plan to take over the world via the bogus 'war on terrorism'

Shit. The media will say it anyway....why do you care about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #88
107. I can't think of any reason 'why not'......they have already
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 09:36 PM by alittlelark
surpassed what I thought they were capable of by quite a large margin. It seems desperate and grasping (just their style!!).

I just am not too sure as to the profit$$ from it....politically, it shows that AlQ could be getting stronger (as the left said it would if we went into Iraq). If it is not AlQ, then it shows that a member of the 'coalition of the willing' cannot control his country.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #88
128. how do they benefit?
all it proves is that they can't fight Al-qaeda if it's blamed on that. And if it was a Basque group it doesn't relate to the US directly at all. Where's the gain there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Astarho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't know about the US
but it does give the Spanish govt. an opportunity to reign in the Basque region (Spain's most industrialized area) from self-rule and would throw a few roadblocks to independence.

It would also benefit certain shadowy corporate interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
117. There is so little liklihood for independence anyway
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 11:49 PM by ZombyWoof
The Basques had been offered the same kind of autonomous plan the Catalans took in the 80's (Spain had a socialist PM back then), and rejected it outright because they want complete independence - not the Catalonian middle way. It will not happen anytime foreseeably, no matter who is the PM, left, right, or center. I do agree Aznar will use this an excuse to reign 'em in, Ashcroft-style, but the Castilian government won't give up the Basque region any more than the Brits will give the Spanish back Gibraltar - or Northern Ireland back to the Irish, et al, for the indefinite time being.

I noticed the Spanish government was quick to blame the ETA, which reminded me of how quick the US blamed Arabs for Oklahoma City.

My take is that the attacks were Al-Qaeda or sympathizers getting back at Aznar for going along with Bush, and now hundreds of innocent Spaniards and others paid the price. Terrorists are pretty linear in how they plan these things - they are like mob hits on a macro scale. All the complexity goes into the planning, and not why they target who they do.

Edit: typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Get a grip eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. ever heard of operation northwoods?
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.

America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
87. No, No, No Frylock
THAT was all just a wacky conpiracy theory.

THAT could have never happened, and there is absolutely NOTHING, no documetation to back it up AT ALL. Really. Fox News told me so.

20/20 did't do a story on Operation Northwoods two weeks before 9/11, either. You're smoking Crack.

Besides, don't you know it's Unamerican and wrong not to blindly wave the flag and believe ONLY the OFFICIAL STORY about 9/11? You are neglecting your Patriotic Duty, and I am afraid I am going to have to report you and several other people in this thread to Homeland Security for conspiring against George Bush's America. After all, either you're with the OFFICIAL STORY, or you're with the terrorists.

Also, Bush didn't sit there and read a book for twenty minutes AFTER the second plane hit the Tower on 9/11, endangering not only himself, but the school children he was babbling to.

THAT'S a conspiracy Theory.

Bush didn't run all over the country hiding in Air Force One from Military Base to Military Base like a scared rabbit on 9/11.

THAT was a Conspiracy Theory.

All of the documented research that has led to LEGITIMATE questions about what really happened on 9/11 that has NEVER been addressed is all conspiracy Theories.

The Air Force was NEVER told to Stand Down on 9/11, even though it was clear the country was under attack.

THAT was a conspiracy Theory.

All that talk about Saddaam not being behind 9/11?

A Conspriacy theory.

WMD's? Just give them time to find them. You'll see. All Conspiracy theories otherwise.

Bush NEVER ordered all investigations into Bin Laden to cease shortly before 9/11.

THAT is a conspiracy theory.

Osama's family was NEVER flown out of the country while all flights were gronded.

THAT was a Conspiracy Theory.

Bush has nothing to hide, and all this talk about him stalling the 9/11 commission, and ALL of the secrecy surrounding the administrations knowlege of 9/11 is ALL a Conspiracy Theory.

Don't you get it? ONLY people like mobuto know the truth about 9/11, and ANY theories or speculation, questions or dissent is simply NOT allowed.

You are truly an Ugly American frylock.

There is ONLY one truth about 9/11, and that's the OFFICIAL STORY.

Quit being such a revisionist.

And if you believe anything I just wrote was presented in anything other than the RICHEST form of tongue and cheek sarcasm, then I'll bet you also believe these thugs are going to leave office lawfully and peacefully. :)

Don't worry yourself over people that cannot be reached frylock.

No mater what alternate reality people choose to live in, NOTHING can ever change what the real TRUTH is, whatever that may be. And we should NEVER rest until it is exposed.

TheWatcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursacorwin Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. wow, i thought folks here would be a tad more skeptical
did anyone ever get the full rundown on bali? i did some research, and was really surprised how certain facts about the alleged bombers went away when the story didn't quite fit the official version...look into it if you doubt me, it stank like a fish.

or how about all those shias and sunnis in iraq who keep saying, "we don't want civil war" and yet bombs keep going off...in mosques no less. yeah, i believe that muslims are behind that, not!

there's also chavez, aristide, and a host of other black/brown leaders that most of you have never heard of: what do they say? that is, when the White Media decides to grant them a 1/2 inch or two? rather consistently, they say that the end of the trail of "terror" most often leads to US military/intelligence. school of the americas, anyone??? hint: it's in GA.

folks, don't be so naive. your government is currently run by people who are not nice and have deep, 30+ yr ties to THE WORST terror groups in the world. if you know about our actions around the world, and the number of murderers we support (saddam was once our friend, remember?) you may not be so quick to jump on Mari333.

anytime MB says it can't be, i'm inclined to believe it! ;-)

has this administration or the american english language media told us the whole truth up front once in the last 3 years? hardly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. They have never told the truth and Machiavelli Prince..is such a
wicked mouthpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malachibk Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. How would that help Bush?
It would just highlight the fact that his war on terror has done NOTHING to actually protect people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Exactly: excellent point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Im watching the Repub whores on TV spin it now
and use it to scare the US public with the idea that it can happen here..another fear tactic..
I dont trust the GOP machine as far as I can spit as to what they are capable of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
55. Turn the damn cable news OFF!
There are just over 100 million voters in the US and about a million are watching cable news; mainly senior white men. Turn the damn thing off because I truly believe that it is clouding your perception of what the American people are seeing and hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #55
165. Here is something on that
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EJ04Ak01.html
We report, you get it wrong
By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - The more commercial television news you watch, the more wrong you are likely to be about key elements of the Iraq War and its aftermath, according to a major new study released in Washington on Thursday.

And the more you watch the Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News channel, in particular, the more likely it is that your perceptions about the war are wrong, adds the report by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA).

Based on several nationwide surveys it conducted with California-based Knowledge Networks since June, as well as the results of other polls, PIPA found that 48 percent of the public believe US troops found evidence of close pre-war links between Iraq and the al-Qaeda terrorist group; 22 percent thought troops found weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq; and 25 percent believed that world public opinion favored Washington's going to war with Iraq. All three are misperceptions.

The report, Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War, also found that the more misperceptions held by the respondent, the more likely it was that s/he both supported the war and depended on commercial television for news about it.

The study is likely to stoke a growing public and professional debate over why mainstream news media - especially the broadcast media - were not more skeptical about the Bush administration's pre-war claims, particularly regarding Saddam Hussein's WMD stockpiles and ties with al-Qaeda.
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
93. Think 9-11
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 09:09 PM by Sterling
Worst failure of any sitting Prez ever and it is spun as his finest hour. See how it works? Scare people with a boogie man so you can "protect them". Like the mob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #93
195. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
139. as though that wasn't already obvious
"the fact that his war on terror has done NOTHING to actually protect people". Still apparently the Bush admin gets away with it.

How does it help Bush? It helps perpetuate the war on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smcmike Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. That is just stupid
I pretty-much hate the bushies, but it is a) stupid and incorrect and b) ridiculous to say they could even think about doing something like this. Posting threads like this makes us look worse than the freepers who think its a great idea to "kill their leaders, take their oil and convert them to christianity"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. are you saying that they would never kill anyone to fulfill their agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. If they can drag my kid off to Baghdad to an illegal occupation
that has murdered thousands for money, they are capable of anything.
These are evil people in this administration, so evil I dont think anyone should give them a pass on anything.
They are murderers and thieves, liars and killers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smcmike Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
140. I agree
to the extent that there are some people in the US government right now who are truly evil (evil in the sense that their goals are so opposite mine that i see them as against everything good and humane), but to jump to the conclusion that anytime anything bad happens in the world it is the Bushies' fault is paranoid, stupid, and dangerous. While there are evil people in the bush government, maybe i should let you in on a little secret: There are evil people all over the world!!! It makes no logical sense for us to be blowing up our allies, and it does not fit with the pattern very well either. Really, people like you are a conservative blogger's dream!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursacorwin Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. don't be afraid to look more deeply
or to imagine that bad people do bad things and are NOT like you and me.

northwoods, MKUltra, COINTELPRO, mongoose, i can go on and on. but then again, i'm black- i see how people are killed by the government (crooked police) in my hood every day! ha ha, anyone who thinks that the military/intelligence communities (leadership) of the major first world gov'ts are not corrupt to the core are kidding themselves. sorry, wake up and see the horror, and then come back and tell me i'm going to far by being suspicious. start with www.unknownnews.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karabekian Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. that rediculous
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 06:01 PM by karabekian
i don't know why people have the tendency to blame america for the attacks purpetrated by islamic extremists. It gets tedious. Like the attack would be politically useful in any way. It illustrates to outside viewers that this site is fringe and looney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. no
believe it or not, Al-qaeda does exist. And there's not much of a gain to Bush from this, barely any short term if any and no long term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursacorwin Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. oh really?
what proof do you have of AQ? from whom did you get it? have you met any members? any arabs? any iraqis? i have, and i'm more skeptical that AQ is a significant threat capable of major operations around the globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. well there are other terrorists too
what about Basque seperatist extremists maybe? The bottom line is there is no evidence or reason for the BFEE to be responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. I'm confused.
You have met AQ members or arabs or iraqis? or all three?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
91. Al Qaeda=Emmanuel Goldstein
Don't you know?

We've ALWAYS been at War with East Asia.

Welcome To George W Orwell's House Of Fun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. OKay and the fact that Spain and the US are in Iraq
illegally occupying Iraq as we speak..wheres the outrage about that on the news? the outrage that Al Queda, if thats who attacked this train, is getting WORSE not better because of the Bush policy of pre emptive strikes? NO the news is spinning it to make the US public be more afraid of another attack on US soil..
Bush created MORE terrorists, not less.
and it boils down to the worst terrorists there are: the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. but those terrorists DO exist
and yes, Bush is making the problem far worse, but by going by your logic that he's responsible for all terrorist attacks, that means there's no terrorism problem anyway, circular logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. Have YOU met an "AQ" terrorist?
Has anybody on these forums? :shrug:
What the hell do you REALLY know about AQ except what is being
spewed from the boob tube? Huh?

Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
109. wow, great logic
The fact that you've never met an AQ doesn't mean they don't exist. I've never met a Palestinean either, does that mean the situation is Israel is all a huge media hoax?

Are you also saying Al-qaeda doesn't exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #109
118. That's precisely what I am saying....
and I guess that you believe in the Easter bunny and the tooth fairy
as well... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nazgul35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #109
166. come to think of it....
I've never met an astronaught...or the President...or a Swede....


Holy Crap!!!! About 95% of everything doesn't exits!!!!!!!

Am I even here?!


AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:crazy:

You can find evidence for anything if you click your red shoes together and say..."there's no theory I can't prove....there's no theory I can't prove..." As for evidence of past conspiracy theories that are now "proved"....what's that list at? 5? 10? Outta how many?

Please...I'd believe in a man on the wing of my plane than I would some of the hairbrained things tha come up at DU from time to time....

But I'll take a serious paper cut defending your right to say them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #109
179. Are you saying that you have proof that Al Qaeda exists?...
Please post it...we'll wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. based on what facts?
other than your hatred for the Bush administration?

you might want to get some fresh air...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. good point
just because we hate Bush doesn't mean he's responsible for EVERYTHING that goes wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfish Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
190. AQ never takes public credit. ETA always warns of attacks.
This time, there was no warning.

This time, AQ took public credit.

Why the discrepancy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. Not me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karabekian Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. it is galling to me
that i haven't seen one show of solidarity and mourning for the almost 200 people murdered by terrorists. It all bush this republicans that. Its dispicable :mad: A lot of people died today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. Not true
I think a lot of us express sympathy for the Spanish victims and share the hope that the perpetrators of this horrid crime may be swiftly brought to justice. Today we are all Madrileños.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waldenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. the neo-DUers
are preparing their justification for when President Kerry invades Syria.
Admitting US involvement in terror attacks is no longer political ammo for the "pragmatists" who don't give a shit about truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. What the fuck does that mean?
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 06:13 PM by WilliamPitt
What 'truth' are you referring to? Do you have any facts? Do you have any evidence? Neo-DUers? Who made you the arbiter of who is and is not a DUer? Is there anything in your post that could withstand a second of scrutiny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. oh come on
you have absolutely no evidence that Kerry plans invade Syria, or that the US was involved in this attack. No one is saying that the US has never been involved in terrorist attacks, just that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT WAS THE CASE HERE.

What you are basically saying is that people who don't automatically blame the US for every terrorist attack think the US can never be responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Uh
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 06:15 PM by mobuto
The US has nothing to admit since the US doesn't blow up Spanish train stations. And I've been a DUer longer than you have, so don't call me neo, Mack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waldenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #44
71. I have to give you some credit
you have always been consistently pro-war as long as I can remember.
I was referring to the hypocrites who are only against republican wars. I will bookmark this thread to prove my point in a year or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #71
121. What does "consistently pro-war" mean?
Are you suggesting I support wars with everybody? I don't follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #121
180. Please...you know exactly what it means. Quit playing games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. Oh God...
What does LaRouche say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. Of course not.
The interesting thing about the blame game being played is htat Asnar's party would love to blame the ETA rather than some middle eastern group. The evidence points away from the ETA and the ETA has denied involvement, and yet the Spanish government is trying to blame the ETA anyway.

If it's Basques, it bolsters the Spanish conservative's hardline position. If the attack came from middle easterners, it exposes Asnar's support for Bush's Iraq invasion as folly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
50. I don't think we have the energy right now
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 07:24 PM by Marianne
we may fudge up the reports to make it go to our advantage, but I don't think we have the resources or the energy for this type of thing.

We don't know who did it. We cannot believe a single thing that is reported to us. Therefore, we do not know if it was indeed Al Queda or the Basque Separatists.

I sort of was expecting some type of retaliation against Spain though. Remember that exciting meeting between Bush, Blair and Aznar in the Canary Islands--pre Iraq attack? It was a total mouth dropper--no one actually knew what the hell it was called for--it was a huge PR flop. Nevertheless, Aznar was touted as beng on board Bush's war machine. He never really did anything more than host that meeing, but, he did look as though the entire country of Spain was behind the killer Bush. Spain had a huge outpouring of protests against Bush's war, but Bush forced Aznar's hand and for some reason, Aznar went along willingly.

Spain then sent soldiers to Iraq, proudly wearing on their uniforms a badge commemerating Santiago and the defeat of the Moors. http://www.chivalricorders.org/orders/spanish/santiago.htm

http://www.red2000.com/spain/santiago/history.html

So, what do people expect?

There they went blithly marching into Iraq wearing this provocative badge. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratdemagogue Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. not in SPain
maybe France or England, but probably not SPain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
53. No.
The attacks in Spain were a tragedy for Spain.

But I don't think they were rovian in direction. Think of this... the bushies really don't want to remind the public that their escapade in Iraq completely diverted their efforts per alqeada. It blows the only single campaign theme that they have... trying to sell bush as good on national security. we know better, but much of the public still buys it per 9-11 and alqeada.

They want to keep us reminded with low level fear.. they do not want to invoke something which gets people thinking and putting two and two together (ala: we were going after alqeada.. then stopped to do iraq... then got mired in iraq... meanwhile alqeada reorganized and stepped up efforts... and... oh my goodness the bushies made us LESS safe....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #53
59. I dunno
This attack bolsters the Bushian script that Danger is On Our Doorstep, that without incessant vigilance against TERRORTERRORTERROR our cities would be cratered tomorrow.

And the fact that it happened in the Great Elsewhere, that is, not here, shows that we're safe under Dubya's protective umbrella.

I don't put a lot of stock in the ability of the media-hypnotized masses reaching conclusions that they're not led to.

Not to say that these bombings are BFEE-engineered. However, I'm not one to consider such things way beyond the pale, just unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. not suggesting beyond the pale
just that ever since things started going wrong in Iraq (er... pretty early on)... they have had a thin line to walk. I don't think they will plant WMDs (or they would have already)... in part because even before the war, in the international press their stories were quickly debunked. According to Ritter it would be next to impossible to plant without a trace of having done so... thus the debacle of planting and getting caught... much bigger risk in net harm than potential gain... even though they really need that gain.

I think more and more of the public is getting skeptical of teambush. Their support has greatly frayed around the edge. They want to capitalize on 9-11 - but it is a fine line before it blows up on them. Hence eventually bowing to calls for bush to testify before the commission and even backing off from the "only an hour" statement. They are abutting right up to that space where some folks who may be growing a tiny bit skeptical are starting to grow more skeptical based on his behavior (as in.. well maybe he DOES have something to hide afterall...) Such is the spector around alqeada and attacks. The potential blowback could cost more than the gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. Your assessment is sound
and I sooo want to embrace it. I pray that you prove to be right, that the public's Bush fatigue finally outpaces Bush's overreach. I'm just a pessimist when it comes to the idea that jihad Republicans will ever be held accountable for their crimes. I've rarely seen it happen in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. they will keep overreaching, no question
like something rotten is going on with that plane of mercenaries.

They will just be careful on certain areas of overreach which will turn their assets (eg public perception of bush as good at national security) from turning into complete liabilities. The created the liabilities but have created the wall paper that shows "success!" - but i think they are aware that the gum keeping the paper up is starting to get diluted, cracked and... well... inadhesive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
56. Nope, it's a spanish group
This morning was domestic terrorism. Think Timothy McVeigh-like homicidal maniacs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
57. Don't know Mari333....
Directly accusing this administration of such acts will immediately
cause a negative backlash against you from BOTH sides of the political
spectrum.
Its a horrendous thought that our "government" could do "such a thing".

Given that we don't know jack sh^t about 9/11 except what the
gov't told us to be "the truth"...what can we deduce from this
attack in Madrid? Or any other attacks that might occur?

Its quite obvious that modern governments, especially of very
powerful nations, cannot and will not EVER be held accountable for
their actions whether directly or indirectly. Thus, even if we make
the accusations and evidence points to their culpability...WHO will
bring them to justice...? Not you, nor I.

We are living in warped times. All the "rules" have been drastically
changed post-9/11 and there's nothing that can be done except
allow the current situation to play out.

You're right, the media whores are playing the government's tune
and will continue to do so. There is no such thing left as
"investigative reporting" anymore. The government states what the
truth is to be and it will be beaten into the sheeple's mind over
and over and over again until it is accepted as "the" truth. Same
thing was done with 9/11, yet notice how now nobody speaks about it.
It was a "done deal"...its thus been "accepted" and that's how its
being printed in the history books.

As for it having been the US... I don't think so. I think it was
more than likely one of its "allies"...a well-known "ally" that
specializes in these sorts of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockasan Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
141. ...a well-known "ally"
...my ass. If you want to Jew-bait, just say what the hell you mean. God,no matter what kind of idiot wears the "tinfoil hat", right or left-of-spectrum, it always comes back to that world-wide Jewish conspiracy, doesn't it? Go on Amazon and get a copy of the "Protocols" for your next bathroom reading session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aussie_Hillbilly Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #141
162. Who is more paranoid?
What made you assume Israel is the only US ally to use state terror? Algeria and Pakistan do it too, and IMO would find it easier to throw their operatives to the wolves if caught (See, its an Arab! Al Qaeda!).

That said, I dont think Bush has anything to do with this atrocity. Too much to lose. Al Qaeda is skillful enough and hateful enough to do this themselves without the CIA holding their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
60. No, and this is a highly distasteful topic without a shred of fact [nt]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. And what "shred of fact" do we have to the contrary....?
Care to elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Okay, I accuse you of murdering 10 martians.
Prove you didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Says who?
Somebody claiming to be AQ Martians?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. What? You want facts?
Heh, Kalian, I just think the claim is outrageous and needs more facts before being considered. And I'm sorry, I have NO reason to believe that our government was involved in this. I do not think it buys them much as I don't think most Americans will be moved by this. If 10000 Iraqi dead cannot move them, then this act won't move them either. Now if they were Americans, that would raise the blood in America.

This is an example of the excess of this forum, IMO. And I usually dig these sorts of subjects, but not this particular one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #70
127. I agree, jeanmarc, the fact that it wasn't in
the U.S. and didn't involve many Americans means it'll be a minor tragedy to most Americans, hence no gain for Bush & co.

Plus if they were going to plan it, I doubt they'd pick trains. Trains are so exotic to most Americans it lessens the impact further.
Now planes might be another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #61
69. The Queen of England did it
got any evidence that she didn't?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #61
113. It was part of a conspiracy involving Bill Gates
prove it wasn't.

common logical fallacy at work here. the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
66. No way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
67. Who thinks the US blew up the train in Spain?"
Great material people. They will just love this , talk about yer tinfoilers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
68. NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
73. I thought it was ETA until the "citizen tip" with the van with the

detonators and the store-bought Koran CD and the crusadenets all started their traditional Al Qaeda concerto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #73
84. did they find any flight manuals printed in arabic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John BigBootay Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
74. I'm sorry but I think that's horribly wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
75. I don't think the U.S. blew up the train, but....
..."President" Bush WILL use the tragedy to revive American's fear of terrorism. His administration is shameless. And, as far as "protecting" us, I think Bush very poorly equipped to deal with any real crisis (as demonstrated by 9/11).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana Democrat Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
77. KOOKS...
...do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoDoYouTrust Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. Uninformed..
believe everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. yup
uninformed, credulous people believe rubbish like MIHOP and that the US murdered 200 people in Spain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
79. What a firestorm you set off.
Who did it, and who benefits?

Mari33, you are on it. Hang in there.

How is step-son doing? I wish you were not so far away. I would have you on-stage and speaking out next weekend. 3/20, Crawford, Tx.

Do you know of anyone that you have talked with that would be willing to be at the rally in Crawford and speak out. I'm looking for the Marine that has CjD somewhere in East Texas. He was terribly abused by his superiors and almost slipped through the cracks.

We need you and all the other Moms, Dads, brothers, sisters, wives, etc to show up. If not at our rally, then at a rally near you. If you need $$'s to make it please let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #79
90. Ill be marching in Kalamazoo on March 20
hehe I didnt mean to set off such a firestorm but I hear all the talking heads on TV and the Repubs saying that this is Spains 3/11 and tying it to Al Queda and saying theres a 90 percent chance the US is next and using the old TERRA ALERT crap to scare people so I just wondered how much the US might play a part in this to get the coverage for the "steady Bush presidency and war on TERRA" crap..
I wish I could speak, I would. Wish I could speak somewhere. Ill march tho I promise you that..Kalamazoo is the closest town I can get to. Good luck in Texas !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
81. Somehow this whole Al Qaeda mess doesn't smell right to me
In fact it smells like a convienent scapegoat to hang all sorts of black ops shit on. Call me tin foil all you want, it won't be the first time, probably not the last. But this whole thing stinks.

I mean, really now, Spanish authorities conviently find an abandoned van with seven detonators and recordings of Koranic verses. Sounds about as convient as the FBI finding a trunkful of plans and verses after 911, or the miraculous survival of one of the hijacker's passports, going through the hell of the WTC collapse, and landing blocks away virtually unscathed. I'm sorry, but most terrorists, most criminals do not leave the tools of their trade simply lying around for anyone to peruse, if for no other reason than monetary.

And then there is the matter of who Al Qaeda is really working for. Supposedly headed by Osama bin Laden, a former CIA contract agent(and what is that old saying, once you're in the CIA, you never get out), it is funded by, among others, a large Saudi family with close ties to the Bushes(also "former" CIA). In fact the Bushes and bin Ladens have been in bed together for decades now, investing in each others business, doing deals together, being socially, businessly, and politically intimate to the point of appearing incestous at times. I mean really now, who was on that lone civilian plane allowed out of the US on 9/12/01? That's right, members of the bin Laden family.

And then there is the matter of Israeli intelligence setting up false front al Quaeda cells in order to provide an excuse to crack down on the Palestinians. <snip>"The Palestinian Authority arrested a group of collaborators who confessed they were working for Israel, posing as al-Qaeda operatives in the Palestinian territories," said the official, on condition of anonymity. He said the alleged collaborators sought to "discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip." <snip> <http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/24546_comment.php >

It is also interesting to note that this is not the only time Israeli intelligence has set up a terrorist organization. Hamas(now frequently cited as a running partner with al Qaeda) was originally set up by Israel as a way to dilute the influence of the PLO in the late seventies.<http://www.upi.com/print.cfm?StoryID=18062002-051845-8272r > Fun and games, fun and games, who's working for whom, who cares? In the world of global black ops and intelligence activities, your friend today is your enemy tomorrow, with everybody getting together for a round of drinks at the end of the week.

So the most important question in this whole mess is WHY? Why would the CIA(or Mossad for that matter) wish to blow up trains in Spain? Well, it is now starting to rumble around about the Saudi links to al Qaeda, how deep they go, how far into the royal family, and the country at large these ties are. And it is all a PNAC crusader's wet dream. For if you can connect al Qaeda to horrible, ongoing terrorism, and in turn, connect al Qaeda to Saudia Arabia, then you have a wonderful excuse to invade Saudia Arabia. Not only will the PNACers get more control of the precious ME oil(a needed conquest in this day of peak oil), but it's also a great twofer for the PNACers fundy shock troops. You conquer the Muslim high holy sites in Saudi Arabia! And after all, wasn't it George Bush, among others in this administration, calling this ME misadventure a "crusade"?

This also works as a setup punch if our PNACer friends decide to pull some stunt this fall. If you will remember how the term "martial law" was bandied around after 911, this could be quite chilling. Think of it now, Bush is headed for a defeat none of his BBV and vote scrubbing tactics can cover. Wouldn't it be handy to have another terrorist attack to hang martial law on? Boom, no elections, no protests, problem solved.

These are ruthless people we're talking about. Operations of this scale have been performed for years in other countries, Guatemala, Niguragua, El Salvador, Chile, Greece, Laos, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Haiti, Cuba, the list is endless. Now, I feel, they're just bringing it all back home. Is it a coincedence that all of the major players in this mummers play all have some serious intelligence ties to one major agency or another? Isn't it the least bit odd that these various pieces of seriously incriminating evidence keeps getting left at the nearby scene of these attacks? Questions, questions, yet the American public blithely sleeps on.

So flame me if you wish, but remember, this wouldn't be the first time we've heard of possible terrorist attacks around the world that were traced back to various intelligence agencies. The Nazis did this with the Reichstag fire, the US did it with Operation Northwoods. There has been over forty years in the interim for the spy guys to perfect their act. We might just be seeing the opening curtain on the upcoming showstopper. Be aware, be warned, and be open to the possiblity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Good post....
too bad that many people don't see it that way.

I agree with you. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #85
111. What is it with some people?
I'm sorry, but I simply cannot believe how easily the people of this country are PLAYED LIKE A FIDDLE. Sure, there is no evidence that the US was behind this, but there is something that some are failing to consider, as they incredibly do every time.

Things like this have become too Obvious, and it is time that EVERYONE become a little more wary and observant, and stop being so quick to swallow every "Official Story" that is force fed you every day.

Everytime, EVERYTIME this administration has been on the ropes or is in severe trouble, SOMETHING happens, SOMEWHERE around the Globe, or SOMETHING is manufactured that allows them to play the Fear Card, The Terror Card, The BOOGEYMAN Card, the ONLY card they have. It is so BLATANTLY obvious it makes me sick.

Back during the Christmas "Terror Scare" I maintained that the whole thing was Bullshit and that NOTHING was going to happen, that it was nothing more than State Sponsored Propaganda, and it WAS. And the incident in France made them look incredibly foolish lending even MORE credibility to that assessment. THERE WAS NO TERROR THREAT FOLKS. NONE. NADA. ZERO.

And now we have this. The Winds Of Black Death? Give me a break. As they have so many times in the past since 9/11, especially with the whole Duct Tape Debacle, they PLAYED THIS COUNTRY LIKE A FIDDLE. They have done so whenever they need to, and always at the UTMOST convenience when it is needed most.

After all the scandals, all the secrecy, all of the lies that led us to attack a defenseless country, Black Box Voting, Enron, The Energy Papers, The Stalling of the 9/11 Comission, The Politicization of 9/11, and ALL of the criminal ghastly things these people have done, as well as all of the EVIDENCE, the OVERWHELMING evidence that has mounted against this criminal administration and made everything they have done while in office make Watergate look like CHEATING ON A MATH TEST, I do not believe the official story of ANYTHING right now. Now bear in mind that I am not going to sit here and accuse our government of carrying this out, but to blindly swallow the OFFICIAL STORY of ANYTHING after all we have seen from this administration is RIDICULOUS. You MUST be willing to be more objective and not take everything at face value.

These people are out of control, and have been for three years. They have run roughshod over The Constitution, Cilvil Liberties, International Law, and every moral and ethical standard you can think of. They have shown they are willing to LIE to go to WAR and kill tens of thousands of people needlessly. They have shown that our OWN SOLDIERS LIVES MEAN NOTHING TO THEM in the pursuit of PNAC or whatever sick agenda they have. They have shown the willingness to topple any DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT on the planet at their whim, without fear of accountability or reprisals. They have shown the willingess to STEAL AN ELECTION, and we have PROOF that they have the technology in place to do it again if they so choose. They have shown COMPLETE contempt for any law, and have shown willingess to subvert ANY law or regulation to get what they want, in effect declaring themselves ABOVE any such laws. They have shown willingness to do WHATEVER IT TAKES to silence ANY dissent or questioning of their methods and policies.

So I ask all of you here, today. HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN WHO YOU ARE DEALING WITH HERE? These people DO NOT play. They DO NOT mess around. They have been running free like drunken frat boys on a pnaty raid for three years, and they think NO ONE can stop them or anything they wish to do. If they have shown the willingess to to do WHATEVER IT TAKES to stay in power, if they are as desperate to stay in power as they appear to be, the question is simple.

WHY WOULDN'T THEY?

If they have the technology and ability to steal the election WHY WOULDN'T THEY?

If they have shown the willingness in the past to do ANYTHING to stay in power WHY WOULDN'T THEY?

WHY WON'T THEY?

Never forget who you are dealing with here. Some want to live in an alternate reality and pretend that the crimes of this administration and the things they have done are just a bad dream, but it doesn't change the Truth. People like TruthIsAll have been doing a yeowman's job of trying to wake people up to this reality, but it seems some wish to stay asleep no matter what.

The reality is this.

Whether you like it or not, THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO LEAVE POWER LAWFULLY AND PEACEFULLY. They ARE going to try something desperate. They ARE going to try to steal the election. They ARE going to pull something in October. They ARE going to play dirty, and NO it would not surprise me to see a State Of Emergency declared with The Constitution Suspended and the Elections Suspended.

It is DIFFERENT this time folks. Even if you don't think any of this will happen, we NEED to be prepared for it if it does, because to misunderestimate THESE people is simply too dangerous. They are too desperate, and they are too power hungry. To ignore them and what they are capable of is to put our very way of life and this 227 year experiment in peril.

Be Prepared.

You can bet DAMN sure THEY are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suspicious Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #81
92. I agree - great post.
It's not :tinfoilhat: to recognize the CIA and other nations' intelligence agencies for what they are. The documentation is out there, we know what these guys have done in the past. I think it would be a tad naive to deny that these people are, indeed, not only capable of carrying out horrific operations, they have an undeniable history of it.

I have no idea whether the CIA was involved in today's bombings, but it's not a possibility I would automatically rule out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #92
100. Sad to say, I don't think we should rule it out
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 09:26 PM by MadHound
It could all very much be on the up and up. Al Qaeda terrorists, with no outside help, committed a horrible heartwrenching act of terrorism. As such, they should be hunted down and punished.

But looking at our past, both here and abroad, we have seen a pattern of increasing violent interference into various societies by one intelligence agency or another. By that sheer simple fact alone, the possiblity of this being more than what meets the public eye should go up. It is painful to live in a cynical world. What is even more painful is having your depth of cynicism surpassed by events unfolding in the world.

But no matter what the circumstances behind this foul deed, our hearts should go out to our Spanish brothers and sisters in their time of need, as theirs did to us on 911. And we should bring those who are guilty to justice, no matter where that path of justice leads.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #92
101. Same here
"I have no idea whether the CIA was involved in today's bombings, but it's not a possibility I would automatically rule out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #101
138. the CIA would give its buckteeth for al-Q's tight lips
The mutual financial and nationalistic interests that bind our intelligence services leave them pitifully corrupt, permeable, and blind as a molerat. The hypothesis that the CIA is somehow faking its own incompetence while pulling all of al qaeda's strings is pretty difficult to support. The story isn't the CIA's all encompassing control of hearts and minds, but their history of propping up "the lesser of two evils" until they have to neutralize their own creation, a la Saddam, Mobutu, Duvalier, Noriega, now bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #92
167. History

http://www.nightmare.org/textfiles/conspiracy/italy.txt
GLADIO: THE SECRET U.S. WAR TO SUBVERT ITALIAN DEMOCRACY

by Arthur E. Rowse
(snip)
In 1968, the Americans started formal commando training for the gladiators at the clandestine Sardinian NATO base.
Within a few years, 4,000 graduates had been placed in strategic posts. At least 139 arms caches, including some at
carabinieri barracks, were at their disposal. *29 To induce young men to join such a risky venture, the CIA paid high
salaries and promised that if they were killed, their children would be educated at U.S. expense. *30

Tensions began to reach critical mass that same year. While dissidents took to the streets all over the world, in Italy,
takeovers of universities and strikes for higher wages and pensions were overshadowed by a series of bloody political
crimes. The number of terrorist acts reached 147 in 1968, rising to 398 the next year, and to an incredible peak of 2,498
in 1978 before tapering off, largely because of a new law encouraging informers ( penitenti ). *31 Until 1974, the
indiscriminate bombers of the right constituted the main force behind political violence.

The first major explosion occurred in 1969 in Milan's Piazza Fontana; it killed 18 people and injured 90. In this and
numerous other massacres, anarchists proved handy scapegoats for fascist provocateurs seeking to blame the left.
Responding to a phone tip after the Milan massacre, police arrested 150 alleged anarchists and even put some on trial.
But two years later, new evidence led to the indictment of several neofascists and SID officers. Three innocent
anarchists were convicted, but later absolved, while those responsible for the attack emerged unpunished by Italian
justice. *32

Conclusive Gladio links to political violence were found after a plane exploded in flight near Venice in November 1973.
Venetian judge Carlo Mastelloni determined that the Argo-16 aircraft was used to shuttle trainees and munitions
between the U.S. base in Sardinia and Gladio sites in northeast Italy.33 The apogee of right-wing terror came in 1974
with two massacres. One, a bombing at an antifascist rally in Brescia, killed eight and injured 102. The other was an
explosion on the Italicus train near Bologna, killing 12 and wounding 105. At this point, President Giovanni Leone, with
little exaggeration, summed up the situation: With 10,000 armed civilians running around, as usual, I'm president of
shit. *34

At Brescia, the initial call to police also blamed anarchists, but the malefactor later turned out to be a secret agent in
the Parallel SID. *35 A similar connection was also alleged in the Italicus case. Two fascists who were eventually
convicted were members of a clandestine police group called the Black Dragons, according to the left-wing paper, Lotta
Continua. *36 Their sentences were also overturned. Although in these and other cases, many leftists were arrested
and tried, fascists or neofascists were often the culprits, in league with Gladio groups and the Italian secret services.
Reflecting the degree to which these forces controlled the government through the Parallel SID, nearly all the rightists
implicated in these atrocities were later freed.
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #81
94. so far the news has talked only about this
and used it as a tool to scream about terror alerts in the US and Al Queda attacking us..keep the people here afraid, and keep Bush in office etc

and we all predicted he might allow an attack to occur to create martial law...
and then no elections.
Thats why Im wary of the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HalfManHalfBiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #81
97. Operation Northwoods was never carried out
Also, there is that little thing called evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #97
108. No, you are correct, Operations Northwoods was never carried out
But look at the operations that have been carried out that we do have evidence for. Operation Mongoose, Iran Contra, the Tuskeegee Institute, COINTELPRO, the CIAs use of various drugs on unsuspecting innocents, Watergate, the assasination of JFK. That's just a partial list of domestic operations that were carried out. I won't go into the foreigns right now, not enough time. If you want though, go google the countries I just named, followed by CIA, and I sure you will find plenty of evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #81
103. Bingo
Exactly nine hundred and eleven days from 9/11/01 to 3/11/04.

Hmmm, let's see, who would be into this kind of macabre numerology?

Other than those frisky skull and bones frat boy types that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #103
135. As I said in another post
The rest of the world puts the day, then the month: 11/09/01, 11/03/04.
911 days doesn't mean anything to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #103
169. Ummm, no.
It's actually been 912 days. Leap year this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #81
112. The conventional wisdom seems to be that the BFEE and the
Spanish conservative party would not benefit from this because the attacks would show that Bush should have finished the war in Afghanistan before invading Iraq and because Spain was one of our few allies and went against the wishes of the Spanish people in support of the Iraq war, the Spanish people will deem their Prime Minister foolish and will vote for the socialist party.

I don't buy that argument at all. In most peoples minds alQaeda,Iraq and indeed all muslim nations have morphed,with the help of the Bush regime and the media,into one giant boogey man..the mideast.

This attack will keep the fear of alQaeda fresh. We keep talking about Rove and the BFEE pulling something in October. Apparently, the alQaeda letter supposedly sent to a muslim newspaper today,talks about an OCTOBER attack in the U.S.

MadHound, you talk about martial law..we have this attack in Spain apparently being blamed on alqaeda, the stage is set for an October surprise and voila...no elections or something so horrendous that just as America is finally awakening from it's 9-11 fear induced coma, another event even more horrific unfolds.

People won't analyze,research or think..they will only react and will be led in any direction by those in charge..

We don't know if the CIA or other intelligent agencies have set this up,but,with the coup in Haiti, the attempted coup in the Congo,and the attempted coup and now recount in Venezuelia, and with the CIA's past history in Vietnam and South America, it would not be all that unbelievable to me.

A New World Order will not come without risks,expense and many deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushh8ter Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #81
188. I hope you are totally wrong...
however, I feel deep down in my gut that you are absolutely right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 10:45 AM
Original message
Man, I hope I'm dead wrong too
But having my deep cynicism passed time and again by the depravity of actual events just doesn't give me much hope. Thus, I continue to prepare for the worst, but pray for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
95. The first thing I said to my mum when...
...she told me about it, and said that they suspect Al Quaeda behind it, was, oh you think? I think the Bush* cabal was behind it. He and the president (is it president?) of Spain are good buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
96. I think so.
The CIA with other intelligence organizations. It was planned like 9/11 was. Wolf is so fucking detestable. He's worse than Sean Hannity because he is slanted as hell but gives the impression that his show is objective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
98. who thinks this thread will be on Drudge soon? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #98
102. Soon I'm sure
shaking my head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
99. There have been "terrorists" all through history
they will still be here after Bush is gone. Clinton didn't cause the Cole to be bombed or the first World Trade Center bombing either.

How Bush responds to the whole thing is the problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #99
115. Clinton didn't cause the first WTC or Cole bombings ...
Bush did. He also fired the first shot at Wounded Knee, and killed Davey Crockett after he surrendered at the Alamo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
104. Don't let your hatred of * cloud your judgment.
It is one thing to overthrow the elected president of Haiti, but it is something different to attack the citizens of an ally. Remember how people were convinced that they would plant weapons in Iraq? Granted they could still do so but to do it would require the cooperation Americans.

I have trouble believing that the average American grunts on the ground, who would be called on to plan, plot, and carry out such a mission, would attack the citizens of Spain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
106. Not me, No way
bad buzz lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
110. Al Qaeda is a US Intelligence asset
And there are many links on this page to support the assertion:

http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/01-11-04/discussion.cgi.28.html

Al Qaeda exists, of course it does. But what is it? And whose interests does it ultimately serve?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #110
114. It's the "military wing of PNAC" as one poster pointed out in another

thread a while ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #114
125. No, Its the military wing of the Backstreet Boys
My assertion is just as supported by the facts as yours, which is to say, not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #110
123. Bullshit
You just made that crap up. Al Qaeda has nothing to do with US Intelligence. I checked your link, to your little message board, and its absurd.

Zaccarius Moussaoui, for instance, was a CIA operative in Chechnya? ROTLFMAO. The link you have shows he was IN Chechnya, not that he had anything to withe Central Intelligence. There is not one single shred of evidence to support your contentions, you just make it up as you go along, adding things like "CIA operative" as editorial commentary, hoping nobody will notice.

Do you really believe this shit? Honestly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #123
130. It is pretty much a matter of public record. There are thousands of

links and thousands of posts on it right here, if you want to search it. You can read all about the proxy war in Afghanistan in the 80s, UnoCal, Agent bin Laden, Pappa Bush, the whole sordid tale.

Or you can just hold a candle and chant "evildoers who hate freedom."

It's a comfort level thing, you do what's best for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #123
175. Let's yuk it up, shall we
Posted this on another thread, but it's was quite utilitarian, enjoy

The people on the other side of the globe are watching the spin



This is quite Humorous just on the face of it. (I wonder if anybody at STARS and STRIPES is feeling jilted )

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FC13Ak02.html
Iraq: Washington spinning out of control
By Ritt Goldstein
(snip) (near the bottom)
After the Zarqawi/al-Qaeda bombshell, the conference moved on quickly until a journalist noted: "That's the first time I've heard characterized as top al-Qaeda leadership. He's always been characterized to me as a freelancer, as tied to al-Qaeda, as a part of Ansar al Islam, but never directly in the top 10-15 of al-Qaeda." Trapped, Rodriguez replied: "Well, the - that's - you're probably right. When I said that I probably didn't say that exactly correctly, okay?"

The Pentagon has explained the need for a news service of its own as emanating from "increasingly combative" media that fail to "get out the message".

Both the general and DiRita subsequently pursued obscuring the revealed misinformation under a broader, al-Qaeda-related smokescreen.?But the episode does serve extremely well again to illustrate the tactics being employed at the highest US levels. And it also shows why the Pentagon's DVIDS news service is attempting to distribute news stories directly to the media, bypassing potentially embarrassing journalistic queries.

DVIDS stands for Digital Video and Imagery Distribution System, and it was created to target smaller and mid-size media outlets that can't afford their own correspondent in Iraq or Afghanistan, the two areas coverage is planned to focus upon. DVIDS was acknowledged as created to place "positive" stories, and minimize the impact of "catastrophic events" - in effect, to propagandize.

While the future of DVIDS isn't yet completely clear, Mac McKerral, president of the Society of Professional Journalists, has been quoted as observing: "This is the kind of news that people get in countries where the government controls the media."
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #123
181. Gee....we must have struck a nerve. Wasn't Osama a CIA asset....
....during the Afghan-Soviet War? Yes or no?

And since Al Qaeda is Osama's organization, isn't it reasonable to believe that Al Qaeda was, and may still be, an asset of some part of American intelligence? Yes or no?

I'm personally betting on a link between the NeoCons and Al Qaeda...because both sides get what they want. The NeoCons got the Iraqi oilfields and Al Qaeda has a global presence never before seen in a terrorist organization.

My, my...you sure did get agitated on this topic, didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not gullible Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #110
146. Nice Link!
Nice link, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
116. unfortunately, gotta admit
it crossed my mind. how wonderful to be able to have these thoughts about one's own government....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
119. Come on. No way
First of all, that is the utmost in paranoia and secondly, they would have NOTHING to gain from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #119
124. these people are using a Freeper argument
Rove was behind it. Why? He's really evil. Does he gain anything from it? no, but he's evil.

Saddam supported terrorism. Why? He was really evil. Did he gain anything from it? no, but he's evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Rose Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #124
143. Of course Bush gains from it.
The Spanish PM is a close political ally with an election to win; one which he now seems likely to win handily, gaining enough seats in the process to avoid power-sharing. And anyway, no one *really* important got hurt... :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
129. It's hard to say at this point in time Mari
Edited on Fri Mar-12-04 12:27 AM by LibertyorDeath
but I understand your concern.

The current group of lying duplicitous thugs running the show are I think capable of far far more than even skeptical and cynical DUers would think.

The history of BFEE is truly nasty.

Doubters check this post

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1221187

http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/gladio.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
132. Isn't the actual angle here...
Isn't the actual angle here that the ETA must be crushed? Who's going to give a shit who actually did this? It's a perfect opening to expand the terror war against designated dissenters and seperatists anywhere they happen to be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
133. No - I don't think it was even a big subject here in US
Yes it led the news, but unless more happens we'll be quickly back to the trivial.

I think this attack may be Al Qaida. And I think we'll see another attack here in US soon. Imagine if they set off backpack bombs here - the populace would be freaked.

I've wondered for awhile why Al Qaida didn't do the terrorist style attacks like what happens in Israel. I don't think we would be as able to go about our normal business as Israelis do. If they did those kind of attacks here I think they could tie this country up in knots.

I'm LIHOP on 9-11 and this PNAC bunch but not MIHOP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
134. I think it was those damn Martians
always messin with Earthlings. Go away damn you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HollywoodLiberal Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
136. No way...
Edited on Fri Mar-12-04 01:52 AM by HollywoodLiberal
It would be SO UNLIKE this adminstration to bomb hundreds of innocent civilians for their own personal gain!

Oh wait....

Let's see what we know so far:
1) We know BushCo loves killing. 2 wars don't happen by accident.

2) We know BushCo loves killing foreigners. So what if they're innocent? That never stopped them before.

3) We know that BushCo is evil. What on earth would make them turn down an idea like this if it was suggested. They don't have a conscience!


People should stop imagining that neo-conservatives are kind, thoughtful people like us. They're not. The Republikkkan destroys and must destroy because he completely lacks the conception of an activity which builds up the life of the community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimber Scott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
142. Gees! Not me!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
144. nope
there's a lot of harsh rhetoric we use, and rightly so

but we shouldn't politicize politics except to call the right on their misuse of tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
145. Not the US government, But...
coming just before an election where the pro-Iraq war candidate is in trouble... :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not gullible Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
148. The same culprits as 9/11, READ THIS!!!
Really gruesome information here, a letter from Spain to a discussiongroup, regarding the real culprits:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=45810


These bastards are really obsessed with symbols and magic numbers (remember it was 911 days since 9/11), look here:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/13_33_freemason_sig.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
149. I don't think that, exactly,
but I'll admit to wondering what's been going on in Spain that would make it politically advantageous. But it wasn't my first thought upon hearing the news - more like the second, right after "How horrible."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
150. Motive, opportunity, means.
Motive:

Keep the spotlight on terrorism. Without terrorists acts *somewhere*, there's little to be afraid of. Now Bush can say "See, terrorist attacks still occur against peaceful countries like Spain". And, here's the punch line: "I, President Bush, am keeping you safe, because the terrorists had to attack a country whose anti-terrorism measures are weak. Ours are too strong to be a target anymore".

Opportunity:

When you have the resources of the Bush Cabal, Haliburton, etc., opportunity is everywhere. It's really just a matter of political timing.

Means:

No question the Bush Cabal has the means.

----

Now, do I think the CIA would have been directly involved -- nah. Do I think Haliburton could have been directly involved -- yes. It may have been just goading on an terrorist group and providing explosives, but I have no doubt that respect of human life is far, far down on their list. Power and profit is the first thing on their list, just take a look at Iraq, and the dismal support granted to our own military, for evidence of the priorities.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
151. Only a total moron would believe the US did it
or someone seriously mentally ill.

thank god for the ignore button!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
152. The rain in Spain falls mainly on the train.
It was al queso. This is a war to fracture the goodwill of the
people. The explosives are either detonated at ground zero in
iraq or along fault lines between peoples. A second tier fringe
european state with a population against a war and a president for
one, where mustlims once fought wars with christians long ago,
on the doorstep of europe. Similarly the turkish bombing on another
of the doorsteps to europe. These symbolic gestures are along the
ideaological fault lines of a coalition to break it apart. Chances
are that alqueda has already predicted the responses for the next
forseeable years, with ground zero being whatever civil war america
is meddling in today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
looking glass Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
155. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
157. Nice little going away present for W's buddy Aznar
It's like when the Mafia leaves the horse's head at the foot of your bed. Aznar had the same look on his face that Tony did on the day of the attack in Turkey. They both had that look that they know they been royally fucked and can't do a damn thing about it. Not unless they want to be spending the rest of their days living at the Hague.

Plus W needed another attack real bad right now, I'm sure Jose won't really mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
159. That's ridiculous
Now that Al-Qaeda's taking credit, this attack is just making Assnar look like an idiot for supporting Bush's war on Iraq.

Let's not give Andy Sullivan any more ammunition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Whiskey Priest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
160. There are more things in heaven and earth...
than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-04 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
161. The Freepers
have a thread up now about Kerry's wife financing the 9/11 families. That story has been totally shot down. Most of the Freepers probably read it on Newsmax or some other web site for kooks. They all believe it.

If Newsmax runs a story that Hillary Clinton was behind the attacks the Freepers would all believe that too.

Who are they to talk about us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demsrule4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #161
164. Those stories are just as stupid as this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KJ Smith Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #164
170. You people are as scary as the Vince Foster was murdered crowd.
You people are as scary as the Vince Foster was murdered crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #170
171. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #171
173. evidence of wmd faked
that wasn't a poor forgery picked up on right away.

it is very hard to FAKE wmd evidence... remeber the anthrax was traced right back to US not to mention those FAKE intercepted missles with wmd mispelled on the label wish i had a picture of that.

oh... and guess who paid for and authorized those deaths in your cartoon, US again.

so it certainly isn't out side the moral realm of possibility with these thugs running the show to imagine they should be put on the list of possible suspects if we were playing detecitve ;->

and so it goes...


welcome to DU :hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
172. This entire thread is more intellectually bereft than Art Bell's career
Get. Real. Real. Soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #172
183. This thread is more real than the info we're being fed by the NeoCons...
...maybe you should take your own advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TanMeKangaroo Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
182. Of course the US did it
The US needs to keep the terror angle flowing so they must have done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #182
185. WIthout the Terror image, Bush is nothing but a failure.
and apparantly the majority of voters in Spain have had enough.

This has the aspect of highly suspicious timing as Paul Wellstone's demise. Too bad we can't tell shit when we smell it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
186. Yep....they did it all the way.....LOL!!!....Yet it backfired big time!
Nothing but mihop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
187. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
189. no fucking way
How is that DUers can say Rove blew it with those 9-11 ads one week, and then masterminded this horrible attack the next? Much as I hate Rove, he had NOTHING TO DO with this. It was a revenge attack on Spain for helping the U.S. in Iraq, and not ROVE pulling strings. He is a two-bit hustler and a punk, and people on here overestimate him.

Jesus fucking christ, tinfoilers make us all look like nuts and flakes. There is no difference between RW flakes and LW ones. None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
191. Best Theory Here!! French Fry Your Mind
Putting aside the terrorism stuff...I believe the best theory is the most plausible given the current environoment...

Bomb threat prompts check of French rail network
many cites...here's one
http://tinyurl.com/3d9ls
FT as well as a couple of other have pointed out that the extortion threat was LEAKED...the French gov't didn't want to go public as it would have screwed up their investigation, negotiations with the group calling itself AZF (named after a French chem plant that had an big accident).

From this article:
On Tuesday, the government urged French and international media not to report the extortion attempt after rumors of it began to circulate. The government said it was trying to protect efforts to establish contacts with the group.

But the Interior Ministry released details Wednesday after newspapers leaked the story.

Investigators have communicated with the group via a special phone line and newspaper classified ads, officials said. After a contact on Monday failed, investigators ran an ad in the newspaper Liberation on Wednesday that read, "My big wolf, didn't see your blue scarf. Give me a sign. Suzy."

Do you see where I am going with this????

Perhaps the Spanish were also dealing with an extortion attempt and just didn't
1) take it seriously
2) pissed off the group
3) too busy with elections

This seems to be far more realistic than the usual 'terrorist' theories...

The terror group "speaks of 10 bombs," Remy said. "We're inspecting the tracks to see if there are others still there."

There WERE 10 bombs detonated in Spain

Some Questions not being asked by the Press:

How many bombs were there in Spain?

What kind of bomb were used in Spain and do they compare with the ones found with the French?

Given that the 'group' responsible has taken a name suggesting it is an 'direct action' extreme Earth First outfit, was the action in Spain linked to the oil spill and the Spanish government's criminal and incompetant dealings?

Just a thought and far more reasonable an assumption than ETA or al queda





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandma Moses Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
192. I don't think so.
But it's an interesting question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
193. I don't think so, but...
Given what we know (& don't know, still) about 9/11, I can see why people would wonder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
194. Missing the point
This idea predictably jumps to the wildest allegation. How about the obvious?

At a significant date, add that to the anniversary of the Iraq War coming up- NO special security alerts. Poised again(yet again) to take advantage of possible, even likely, attacks, but not to prevent or respond selflessly.

When Spain was hit in timely fashion they must have sucked in their collective breaths and hoped the Right could profit from it. Unfortunately Euro security is not all Bush shills, nor the media, nor the wide awake anti-war masses.

OTHER coups have been going at a wild pace these past weeks with more on the horizon. Silence mainly from the admin except when things don't go exactly as they want.

I don't know about planning or compromised Intel but for sure it is the old game of It Will Happen, Be Ready to Take Advantage. Anyone who has signed on with Bush is fully cognizant of the required posture(besides proximity of the lips to Bush's derriere).

As to the degree and instrumentality of "conspiratorial" activity, you can imagine anything you want. The deadly truth is that- even subconsciously- they want to get hit, want to go slow on prevention and security, want to be ready to react in ways profitable to them politically and financially.

It is the game board they see themselves on, not a first priority of rescuing citizens or getting rid of the security problem.

When we ever, ever get access to prosecutorial process then we can start asking for a full account.

When you start spreading wild accusations(in the hope they will get get embedded in the populace- and they do) you are playing the same sick spin game, not coercing anything out of the bad guys except giving them cover of yet another distraction. What of the CIA being dragged in to all the dirty coups? Sure it is consistent with past behavior in perhaps more benign administrations but it sure digs them in deeper after the WMD controversy nearly split them apart. These are deeper and more obvious issues, the shape of the cloud that we see, not trying to imagine what's inside the cloud.

Let's keep the not so clever dream theories in perspective. The worst thing that has not changed since 911 is the WH practically welcoming a terror display to increase their power, and not being very enthusiastic about the substance of "Homeland Security" any one than NCLB or going to Mars or promoting democracy in the world.
In this miasma LIHOP does not even have to an active policy or decision. The "P" in purpose is all the Bush Coup agenda and the Oligarch/PNAC revision of history to which it is allied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC