Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sibel Edmonds: the Richard Clarke of the April 13-14 9-11 Commission...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:08 AM
Original message
Sibel Edmonds: the Richard Clarke of the April 13-14 9-11 Commission...
... hearings, to be held in DC next month?

Infiltration of the FBI's translation department by foreign spies, and an Ashcroft coverup of this infiltration, surely belongs on the agenda for 9-11 Commission hearings on "Law Enforcement and the Intelligence Community" (See the discussion in LBN at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=442067 )

Someone who's talked about this issue on 60 Minutes ought to be on the witness list.

The Commission won't release its panel member list until about April 3rd, according to http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/index.htm :

"The following represents the remainder of the Commissions 2004 investigative hearing schedule:

March 23-24, 2004 Counterterrorism Policy Washington, DC

April 13-14, 2004 Law Enforcement and the Intelligence Community Washington, DC

May 18-19, 2004 Emergency Response New York City The 9-11 Plot New York City

June 8-9, 2004 National Crisis Management Washington, DC

Additional information, including times, locations, and panels, will be disseminated approximately ten days prior to each hearing. Such information will also be available on the Commissions website--www.9-11commission.gov. Hearing dates and topics are subject to change at any time.

AL FELZENBERG, DEPUTY FOR COMMUNICATIONS National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

Office: 202-401-1725 Cell: 202-236-4878 Fax: 202-296-5545"

afelzenberg@9-11commission.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree - funny how our liberal media has hid the pre-911 cover up
Washington, DC -- March 24, 2004 --12:15 EST -- FBI translator, Sibel Edmonds, was offered a substantial raise and a full time job in order to not go public that she had been asked by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to retranslate and adjust the translations of subject intercepts that had been received before September 11, 2001 by the FBI and CIA.

Edmonds, a ten year U.S. citizen who has passed a polygraph examination, speaks fluent Farsi and Turkish and had been working part time with the FBI for six months-- commencing in December, 2001.

In a 50 reporter scrum in front of some 12 news cameras, Edmonds said "Attorney General John Ashcroft told me 'he was invoking State Secret Privilage and National Security' when I told the FBI I wanted to go public with what I had translated from the pre 9-11 intercepts".

http://tomflocco.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. DUers familiar with neither Sibel Edmonds nor Tom Flocco, ...
... (a group to which I belonged until half an hour ago), may find the following two links very helpful:

Paul Thompson (of 911 timeline fame) posted an excellent DU discussion in January, archived at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=323862

The Office of the Inspector General at the US Dept of Justice put the 60 Minutes transcript online at http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/0311/attachment1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm looking forward to
the next round of hearings. So Ashcroft invoked national security? We are witnessing an ass covering operation on an unprecedented scale here. It's breathtaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Condi Rice may be able to survive this week's hearings, but there's ...
... no way Ashcroft can stay in office if Edmonds testifies well or if the Ashcroft documents Paul Krugman talked about Tuesday are discussed at next month's hearings (see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1276543 )

Ashcroft's incompetence and corruption are simply stunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. better get familiar with Zelikow
from what I've read, HE controls the witnesses to be called

if that's true, according to several sources, it is,

Sibel won't get any closer to testifying than, oh, say CONDI RICE

hahahahah

testify means, in the strict sense, appearing under oath, not being merely interviewed, which is what condiliar did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC