Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The WMD Cracks at Bush's Roast: Why It's Not OK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:08 PM
Original message
The WMD Cracks at Bush's Roast: Why It's Not OK
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 03:14 PM by Plaid Adder
I've been thinkin' about this...I have myself made many a "where are the WMDs?" joke over the past several months, and they have also been made all over the airwaves and the talk shows and whatnot for a long time now. So I could see how Bush's handlers might have thought that it was safe for him to get up and make fun of the whole thing; after all, 'laughing at himself' is something that he has always been rewarded for, although even pretty early in his career I stopped finding it funny. My first DU article ever was about that very thing, in fact:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/01/07/26_yale.html

So, just as a theoretical problem, since the nature of humor is always an interesting thing to speculate about, I pose the question: what makes it OK when someone else jokes about the lack of WMDs, and sick and wrong when Bush does it?

Let us take an example of someone who is *not* Bush who is making WMD jokes...for instance, myself, long ago back when I was still in my song-parody phase. This isn't particularly good, but it's useful as an example because it is about the exact same thing Bush was spoofing; it was written in May of 2003, after Powell's presentation on the WMDs he KNEW they had to the UN security council:

ME AND A. CHALABI
(adapted from "Bobby McGee," with apologies to Janis Joplin)

POWELL:

Busted flat with no intel, headin' into town,
Feelin' like an empty-handed cheat,
Chalabi called to wish me luck, noticed I was down,
Said, "Hey, I heard there's WOMDs in Tikrit."

I took out my PowerPoint and started cuttin'-pastin'
I was typin' while Chalabi sang the news
With Jack Straw slurpin' scotch in time, Chalabi's flappin' lips online,
We made that im'nent threat look good as new...

Chorus:
Freedom's just another word for no one left to dupe
Nothin' ain't worth nothin' but it's free
Feelin' threats was easy when Chalabi dished his scoop
And feelin' threats was good enough for me...
Good enough for me and A. Chalabi.

From the dumpsters of Basra to the toilets of Baghdad
Chalabi knew just where banned weapons were--
To all of that bad shit we just knew ol' Saddam had,
Chalabi's tips would lead us, we were sure.

Then somehow though we bombed Saddam, we let him slip away--
He's still lookin' for those weapons, and I hope he finds them--
Cause I'd trade in all my stars now for just one asshole who'd say
"I know there's nukes up that gazelle's behind..."

Freedom's just another word for nothin's yet been found
And nothin' is all Chalabi left me!
Ah, talkin' shit was easy 'fore we went in on the ground,
And talkin' shit was good enough for me...
Good enough for me and A. Chalabi.

The point of this is to make fun of Bush, just as Bush's roast speech was designed to do. What it does, that the roast speech didn't do, is make an argument about *why* they never found any WMDs, and suggest that it was because Powell et al. were so desperate for 'intelligence' that would allow them to support their rush to war that he would accept any cock-and-bull story Chalabi fed them. Which, as we now know, is true.

Bush's decision to use a "slide show" format could also be read as a reference to Powell's disastrous UN presentation (remember Powell showing us all the Powerpoint slides of the deadly trucks and ramps and rectangular buildings?), which in a way makes the entire speech a WMD joke. But when he inserts the actual references to that speech--the two "Nope, no WMDs here" slides--they are not put in context. They both interrupt unrelated banter (the first comes after a joke about Kim Jong-Il supporting Kerry, the second comes right after a joke about Bush forcefully giving an order about where they should all have lunch and right before a joke about Skull and Bones). The WMDs thing is being used as a running gag, something you can just drop in to get a laugh and then move right past. There's no explicit or implicit suggestion about _why_ they never found the WMDs; they're just asking the audience to find the search itself, and the fact that they never got results, funny.

So, one thing that grates about Bush using the WMDs thing for comic mileage is the total lack of reflection or self-criticism. He may be 'laughing at himself' but he's not laughing at the *real* flaws that got us into this mess: his own tunnel vision, his seriously warped priorities, his callous disregard for human life, his corrupt and callous advisors, and his willingness to manipulate the truth itself, plus the CIA all the branches of the U.S. government plus the UN and Britain in order to go on his wild goose chase. All that he's 'laughing at himself' for is the same thing he's always been 'laughing at himself' for: his own hapless stupidity.

It may seem strange that as the president of the free world he can get away with presenting himself as an inarticulate, incurious moron who can't do anything right; but the whole "there you go again, Ollie" shtick that he and his handlers have been sustaining throughout his career is part of what generates the otherwise utterly baffling sympathy and identification with Bush that his base seems to feel. Basically what they have been trying to sell him as is a better-looking, fitter, more 'presidential' version of Homer Simpson: sure, he's no scholar and he has no use for book learning and he can't talk too long without committing all kinds of grammatical and factual bloopers, but he's good hearted and everyone around him loves him anyway. For people who themselves feel like they're not smart enough, cutthroat enough, sophisticated enough, or powerful enough to succeed the way they wanted to succeed, that kind of self-deprecation works very well. He's what they would be like if they got to be President, and so they'll forgive him his Homerisms and his fuck-ups because he makes them feel like they could be president too, instead of making them feel inadequate and ashamed.

The reason this "aw shucks, I've gone and done it again, haven't I" hangdog thing isn't working for him now is that people have realized that it's kind of a problem that the President of the United States is either unable or unwilling to take responsibility for any of his actions. That's why the WMD jokes are not funny coming from him: he was the one who got us into this mess, and he's the one who should have prevented it. To have created this colossal waste of time, money, and human life, and then to stand back and go "I'm a bad, bad boy" and expect us to forgive him for it by laughing with him is not only ludicrous but infuriating.

That's what makes the real difference between him and someone like Jon Stewart: Bush had the power to stop this from happening. None of the rest of us did. I sure fucking tried; and so, no doubt, did Stewart; but the reason WMD jokes from Bush's opponents fall into the category of "black humor" is precisely the fact that we know we don't have any real control over what's happening to our country. There's a difference between the grim laughter of irony and the kind of yuks that Bush was shooting for by inserting those two comments into his speech. We're laughing because otherwise the pain will kill us. He's laughing because he thinks our pain is funny.

Anyway, that's my take on it: you should not laugh about your own crimes until you have acknowledged, repented, and made reparation for them. And we're all going to be LONG dead before we see Bush or anyone on his team do THAT.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hear, hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush is a bad man
Why is bush not allowed to joke. That bastard has killed over 525 american soldiers for a JOKE!?!?! People shouldn't be mad, they should be mobbing.

I'll admit, I only read about 2/3rds of the post, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree and would add one thing....
those of us who have made WMD jokes, myself included, were not the ones that made the decison to send 382+ US troops to their death and thousands more to be injured, not to mention the untold thousands of dead Iraqis. It very much goes to your point about the lack of responsibility of bush and his admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. where's his sincerity and credibility on the issue
sure we can joke about it because they haven't been found when Bush Inc promised us they were in Iraq.
So if they are found the egg is on our face but now its on this sick fuckers face also. and like I said in my subject line where's his sincerity and credibility on the issue. People are dying over this issue or is he "not in the loop"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Spot On
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodictators Donating Member (977 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. The idea of telling WMD jokes, with the 9/11 hearings...
just a few hours earlier, couldn't have been worse.

In both cases many innocent peple died because of Bush's actions.

Just yesterday, the Wall Street Journal had an account of Bush's 7+ minutes sitting in a 2nd-grade classroom after having been told by his Chief of Staff Andy Card that the nation was under attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's not presidential
And it would be really nice to have a president who's presidential again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Speaking of presidential...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Burden of Proof
we can joke. leno can joke. we know it's a joke.

Bush has spent the past year and a half trying to convince us of something that was so obviously, laughably untrue. his mockery shows that he no longer believes it either, or at least he's peeled back the curtain to show that he never believed it.

It's as creepy as OJ making jokes about himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sure all those guys at Walter Reed got a chuckle from it.....
NOT! As well as the families of the dead. "Hey, I sent you around the world to get your asses shot off for WMD's that never existed, but ain't I funny?" How about going on the orthopedic wards and giving out "I went to Iraq and all I got was this lousy stump" t-shirts, wouldn't that be a vote-getter for him? (I could wear a similar t-shirt, but replace "Iraq" with "Vietnam". Another war that shouldn't have been fought) Maybe Al-Jazeera can get it translated into Arabic and we can show it to the Iraqi people. They could use some cheering up, although they'll need a generator to power their TV's.
Gales of sarcastic laughter, howls of derision.
What an ass. It's all just a joke to him, always has been. I'll bet he'll never apologize to the 9/11 families like Richard Clarke did, what a contrast, class and ass. Naw, shrubbie can't be wrong about anything. I'd love to see a Kerry ad using footage from shrubbies' little minstrel show....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks PA, Well Said As Usual. David Corn Also Has A Good
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 03:41 PM by Beetwasher
read on this here and he was at the event:

http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=1336

--snip--

Even if Bush does not believe he lied to or misled the public, how can he make fun of the rationale for a war that has killed and maimed thousands? Imagine if Lyndon Johnson had joked about the trumped-up Gulf of Tonkin incident that he deceitfully used as a rationale for U.S. military action in Vietnam: "Who knew that fish had torpedoes?" Or if Ronald Reagan appeared at a correspondents event following the truck-bombing at the Marines barracks in Beirut--which killed over 200 American servicemen--and said, "Guess we forgot to put in a stop light." Or if Clinton had come out after the bombing of Serbia--during which U.S. bombs errantly destroyed the Chinese embassy and killed several people there--and said, "The problem is, those embassies--they all look alike."

--snip--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. And the little talking heads on MSNBC
are talking about it now. They said they didn't ask for e-mails, but they got them. And one of the female yappers just said that they were talking to Lester Holt (who attended the dinner last night) that, in the context of the whole evening, the bits were funny. The little talking headlet just said that the bits look different seeing them on their own and not in context. And in just what context do they even think these bits were amusing? I can't imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty_the_Right Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hmmmmmmm, context
Like the Dean Scream <tm> ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, the "Dean Scream" was shown again and again
out of context, and that was wrong. But what context could make Bush's jokes amusing and not appalling, or at the very least, in very bad taste?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty_the_Right Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Just pointing out the duplicity
Of the media.

Not that it needs to be, but anytime I can make a joke about what they did to Howard, it takes away some of the sting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. CONTEXT= shit-faced drunk
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Don't laugh, I think you're probably right...
There's a reason comedy clubs serve alcohol. A lot of stuff seems funnier when you're drunk. I remember sitting through a comedy 'show' at a club in El Paso stone cold sober and being amazed that people were laughing at material this lame. Ah well.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. the sheeple context, of course
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 05:55 PM by noiretblu
he's the pResident
he's telling "jokes"
the sheeple laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Other people can joke about this but Bush can't
Kind of like criminals writing books and making profits off of their victims

It is ok for someone else to write the book but not the criminal.

Bush should not be able to "profit" off of his WMD lies, even if the profit is an intangible such as improving his "regular guy" image. It was in poor taste. What were they thinking? I am getting sick of this sophomoric little towel snapper. There is nothing funny about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivejazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. This "joke" is nearly on the same level as
his mocking of Karla Faye Tucker. The man has shown once again that he doesn't have a shred of humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. scarsborough says
that bush can joke cause he thought they were there and it was a joke on his misstep with thinking legitimately the weapons would be found. the reason this offends so many so, cause we think he knew they werent there or certainly not the degree he said prior to the war. and that is what is so offensive to know they werent a threat to create the war and then joke like it was just a mistake of his. not a mistake, more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC