Rate Condi's 60 Minutes performance

I give her a big, fat 0.

That segment was a waste of air time.

but IMHO, that performance torpedoed what bit of credibility she had left.

When you come from so rarified a backround as George W. Bush, you just know that blame is something assigned to the help.

"Poor girl. So who do we hire to replace her?"

answered any questions.

She was as evasive as ever, and the questions are never really pressed to expose her for the lyin' ass beeyotch that she is.

he asked some good, tough questions -- opened the door for her to redeem herself.

Guess being a miserable failure is a prerequisite in this admin

She did not help her case.. Bradley looked like someone who wanted to be someplace else....anywhere else....

He had her stuttering over her lies.

She gets a 0! I can't believe I even tuned in. I think she did Bush* a disservice. She should go back into hiding.

was that the best the gapped toothed Biatch could do?

check out the new time

Focus on the terrorists.

We understand your loss.

Focus on those that did this to us.

We feel your pain.

Pathetic.

The jokes * made at that dinner shows just how this administration feels about 'our' loss.

In their words, it was a trifecta.

doesn't mean she didn't spin well.

She's a good speaker and spinner.

Huh?

She deflected questions well. And the interviewer SUCKED.

When she talked about Afganistan, I was begging him to ask, "how's afganistan doing today?" or something to that effect. Of course he didn't, and she probably got the questions beforehand.

all that quivering and nervous energy just makes me need a drink. If she testifies, I bet she will loose it. She seems like she can just barely hold it together now.

Condoleeza Rice is becoming the Bush Administration's scapegoat. Maybe Rice should not be shielded behind Executive Privilege and maybe, which sounds extreme, hide behind the 5th Amendment.

Something does not add up here. Linking Iraq with 9/11 and undiscovered WMDs its such a mixed message. It demonstrates that some mistakes were made and wrong judgments were made regarding our future national security. The Bush Administration needs to fess up. Rice you should go to public hearings of the 9/11 Commission and try to put this to rest.

:bounce:

She'd never pass a polygraph with a performance like that. Since Junie is so fond of giving everyone nicknames, I think he should dub her Blinky.

Another name for her could be The Gap
:silly:

nt

eom

60 minutes let her ride and she drove off the road . . .

for their purposes.

Not for mine, of course, but she did her job well.

JMHO

... or something like it. See "a CHALLENGE from the Center for American Progress!" at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1286112 :

"... despite Rice's comments, we were unable to find a single instance where Rice, Vice President Cheney or President Bush said "al Qaeda" or "bin Laden" in public between Bush Inauguration and 9/11....

Send any instance of Rice, Cheney or Bush uttering the words "al Qaeda" or "bin Laden" in public between 1/20/01 and 9/10/01 to pr@americanprogress.org . The first person to submit a successful entry (which we can verify) will receive a free copy of "Deliver Us From Evil" by Fox News Anchor Sean Hannity signed by the members of the Progress Report team."

http://www.americanprogress.org

Worse than we are thinking. Twelve minutes?

without those she would sputter, drool, and piss her pants.

I know her position was NSA but until this last week I've never seen her as a "bad guy" but rather a pawn in the neocon game.

I don't even think she had any power. The real power was Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Cheney. Remember how Bush took the power away from Rumsfeld when it was obvious the war in Iraq was going badly?

Personally, I'd rather have Rummy, Wolfie, Bush or Cheney in the hot seat. Can't help but think Condi is getting chicked. Am I overly sensitive?

The national security adviser is the conduit between the CIA/FBI/Defense and the President. Her position is critical. When Berger wanted to relay the importance of fighting terrorism to the * administration, he spoke to Rice. When Clarke presented his anti-terrorism plan, he showed it to Rice. When * asked, in May, 2001, about having a plan for Al Qaeda, it was Rice who spoke to Clarke. She's a key player.

She's the freakin' national security advisor. If Bush was focusing too much on Iraq and not enough on bin Laden when the intelligence community was screaming that the sky was falling, it's her job to set him straight. It's her job not to let him go on vacation during such a crisis.

If she wasn't sounding the alarm with the president with the appropriate degree of urgency, then she should be fired.

If she was, but Bush ignored her advice and went on vacation anyway, then he needs to answer for it.

9/11 was only a surprise to us. Not them. I'm not saying they could have prevented it, but they need to demonstrate that they were on top of it and the terrorists got the better of us that time.

I think the truth is that they just weren't on top of it, despite all the warnings from the Clinton administration.

I have no doubts Bush and his minions are forcing Condi to forgo public testimony. While I'm sure she's a PNACer, I wonder if she is a tad bit conflicted by the events of 9/11.

I suspect that she'd be able to bring this administration down with her insider knowledge. It seems like it will be Condi's burden that her refusal to go under oath will be seen as a personal integrity issue and this will follow her for the rest of her days.

She certainly is not a very convincing liar, her body language gives her away.

Because as head of NSA she is the #1 person in the US Gov't responsible for advising the president on security. She is supposed to deal with the threats presented to her, & advise the Pres on what they are, & what to do.

According to all reports, the CIA was going nuts in the summer before 9/11, & yet nothing was done.

Rumsfeld is responsible for the military, & that is not US security.
Wolfowitz is his deputy; they can't be held responsible for 9/11.

The responsible people are Bush, Cheney, Rice, CIA & FBI.

to shoot down enemies within our own borders.

will be to see how the talking heads treat the interview......

They can relate what she said without showing how she said it

or

they can show her saying her message, warts and all!

Let's see how this plays out.

Yahoo lead story

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040329/ap_on_re_us/sept_11_commission&cid=519&ncid=716

at not saying anything, not answering any question,(and I did think Bradley had a couple of times where he pressed her--all she could say was "I don't agree)and of looking like an animal caught in a trap....

It's always easy for weak cowards like Bu$h and Saddam to hide behind women and children. Condi is reciting the same old thing, this should be transparent that if America really wants to know the truth, rise to the challenge and demand that she, Bu$h and Chenney all testify in public under oath. I think she's challenging the public to put pressure on the administration by her constant recital of bull, to make it obvious that if we don't believe her and her boss, then by all means, "bring 'em on!" Everyone should sign a petition and call their representatives to pressure them to testify or else, begin impeachment on the grounds that Clarke is irrefutably telling the truth...which we all know, he is!

It was a good performance for a woman who always sounds like she's on the verge of bursting into tears. In this interview, she didn't sound that way, for once.

However, she gets an F for context. She sounded like Scotty McClellan in her use of repeated talking points. She also was fond of using the word, "Look..." in a very dismissive and condescending way. In contrast, I don't recall Clarke (in his MTP interview) sounding any way other than respectful and straight-forward in his answers to Russert.

All in all, this will most likely have no effect on her downward credibility spiral. The only chance she has to stop that is to testify to the 9/11 commission under oath and in public.

OR a "No" comment. She Kept Shaking Her Head. WHAT GIVES?

Contradicta Rice. I wasn't impressed. I'm just glad it was only one segment.

She is lying her ass off.

I don't feel one bit sorry for her. She is a lying criminal co-conspirator who is grossly incompetent in her nominal job.

She didn't say anything she hasn't already said. I suppose she thinks we will accept her version if she says it enough. Not everyone in America is stupid, Condi.

I'm sick and tired of her and the rest of this crime syndicate trying to manipulate us through the talk shows. She needs to speak under oath, and as the pugs like to say "if you have nothing to hide ......"

Understanding that "60 Minutes" is a credible news source, I appreciate Ed Bradley not giving her a free ride. His questions were good.

A waste of time.
Nothing new, same lines she's been repeating for a week. 60 minutes had a no-story story tonight, it was for ratings only.

She said nothing, it meant nothing. And she was dismissive of any apology, said we should focus on "who did this". Too bad she didn't focus on them before the attack happened.

I was watching "On The Waterfront" on TCM - a movie about one brave man who takes on organized crime.

Sound familiar? ;)

Instead of bums which is what they are!"

After the November elections - if not sooner. :)

(Edited for typo)

and Condi only got one! Ha Ha Ha. Good on ya, 60 minutes.

:hi:

Long time no see

:hi:

I swear, if I were a voting member of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, I wouldn't just nominate the girl -- I'd be lobbying 24/7 for Anacondolleeza to take home that statuette!

and about a 9 for beat....suddenly, i feel like dancing!




dp

It's nice to see CBS carrying our water for once. They owed us for what they did to Gore in 2000 and it looks like they are coming through with glowing colors. It's about time we got our "liberal" media back!

You are a very funny person.

Do enjoy your visit to DU. Best of luck.

Do you not agree that we are finally getting a fair shake from CBS?

Hello?

Edited for a typo.

When seeking to insert helpful information into the dialogue, you should probably avoid using such right-wing talking points as "hit piece" and "liberal media." If you will review the posts to this thread, I think you will agree that most viewed Bradley's performance as tepid, at best.

Thus, when you act as if this were some kind of really cool propagandizing on the part of CBS, you sort of stand out as a person who may be, shall we say, living a slightly different reality from the rest of us.

You do realize, don't you, that nobody around here much believes that the liberal media ever existed. That point of view is somewhat supported by the admission of some right-wing pundit (Podhoretz? Just can't remember right now.) that "liberal media" was only ever a useful talking point, and was never a reflection of reality.

Also, you might consider that, to the extent the media were to seek to present truth instead of spin, many here would consider it, well, doing their job, as opposed to "carrying our water."

Sure hope this helps, because I'm sure you can provide additional valuable insights.

the great Dr. Condoleezza Rice. She was to defend herself and refute Richard Clarke and his charges against the White House. After about five minutes 60 Minutes goes to a commercial break and never comes back to the interview that was to enlighten America. Normally after an interview of this sort they usually thank the guest for appearing and trade pleasantries. Not tonight! 60 Minutes just blew Condi and Ed a good bye kiss without saying anything more.

Strange!! Was the plug pulled? I think it was, if not 60 Minutes screwed me again.

More blinking, more "no-no" body language from her lizard head. More "nothing could have been done."

Speaking of that latter phrase, where were the interceptors on the morning of 9/11? You know. The jet fighters that are supposed to go check up on any aircraft under traffic control which goes off course and does not respond to radio calls.

Where the FUCK were the Interceptors on 9/11?

Sending them up was certainly "something that could have been done." Why wasn't it? Do I really want to know?

:freak:
dbt

She did the administration no favors here. She looked evasive, wooden...pathetic.

This person has no right to be in this position - she accepts NO responsibility for her inaction.

Have a nice ride to the bottom, Condi.

I always figure the person holding these top positions would be more fierce and competent--like Clarke.

Rice buckling under the first sign of pressure does not bode well as a National Security Advisor. It reiterates the incompetence that Clarke is asserting about her and her bosses.

So I read the thread on 60 Minutes over at freeper-land. They didn't like the interview either. Of course they mostly trashed CBS and Ben Bradley for being over-the-top liberals, but even so, they seemed disappointed.

I noticed one thing. They were all talking about sending piles of emails to the commercial sponsors and to CBS, complaining about the left-wing slant on everything.

The extreme right-wing has an amazing ability to spend most of their time complaining, which is how their views (illogical as they are) end up dominating American opinion polls.

My MIL's husband is a freeper. They never visit, never ask about their grandkids, never spare a thought for anyone but themselves. He spends hours every day working on his investments, posting on freeper, and, I guess, sending outraged emails and letters to everyone he can think of, complaining about their support for the left.

Sheesh.

world and I'm intrigued with what "yardwork" was saying about his "MIL's" is all about...The republican's I've know in the past have always been self-absorbed, selfish, greedy and have very little capacity to feel other people's problems and injustice...I hate them ALL!

But I love hearing others insights and perspectives.

I was expecting after the commercial break to hear more of Condi. But she really didn't say much. No wonder she doesn't want to testify public and under oath. She stinks at this.

Leslie's Stahl's interview with Clarke was freeped by the "Flying Monkeys"
Help the journalists brave enough to confront the real issues and send a letter to CBS> Details in ...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1304992

I think she made their case weaker. Ed Bradley's questions were right on and I loved the way he questioned with lists...especially the list of people who were saying almost exactly what Clarke is saying. This is why the hate mail chain was started. They had their marching orders and faxes ready on cue.

Shes looking haggard and wasted as she tries to keep up with all the mistatements and propaganda this admin uses. You could see her searching the archives in her mind to make sure she answered questions the way she was told . She came up drastically short on the answer of why not in front of the commission and the ones about Clarke. Poor performance and no better than a F .

I can see why she's not testifying publicly under oath.

eom

I give Condi an F. She was spinning faster than Bill O'Reilly in that interview with Ed Bradlee. I'd've given my right arm to know what was going on inside her head at that moment.

F for believability
F for poise
F for appearance--she looked like crap.

The Bush propaganda machine must be running on fumes. I expected better than this.

On second thought, nevermind. She just plain sucked.

Sucked she did. She just repeated the same shit she's been trying to peddle all over the media for the last couple of days.

No news here.

:shrug:

she looks extremely worried. Her blah, blah, blah, had me shaking my head as to WHY she is putting herself(supporting this bunch) through this. I don't think she has many options. It looked as if she kept thinking, "if I can just make till I resign..."

I wonder if it's hard for her to sleep at night knowing all that she knows.