Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi's, George's, Dick's Testimony, One Thing .....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:41 PM
Original message
Condi's, George's, Dick's Testimony, One Thing .....
It just occurs to me that when Dr.Rice gives public testimony, or when President Bush does, or even when Vice President Cheney testifys they will all three have one thing in common. They will not be there testifying about what they were doing before or after 9/11, what they will be doing is testifying against Richard Clarke, trying to make excuse for their own lack of appropriate action. That makes them different from anyone else who has testified - these three will add absolutly nothing to the knowledge of the events leading up to that day or those that immediately followed. Nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Testimony
So Bush did a flip-flop and no news source calls him on this. Can you imagine what they (media) would have done had this been Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Lone Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oaths mean nothing to this bunch.
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 06:47 PM by The Lone Liberal
Hell, Bush contravened Texas State Law within hours of his being selected. He moved all of his papers to his father's library where they could not be obtained under Texas State Law and he did it through an illegal or criminal act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. The 9/11 Commission isn't a serious investigation.
The questioning wasn't very aggressive.

The Commission is just PR to make it look like the government is interested in finding out the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC