Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you genuinely fear that 1984 is happening?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:38 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you genuinely fear that 1984 is happening?
Am I alone in that when I read Animal Farm and 1984 that I seriously see these things happening all around us under Bush? Or am I really that paranoid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is just no other explanation,
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's like some people
considered "1984" a manual instead of a novel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is what Jon Stewart said! When talking about the fake news
from the Whitehouse, he said the * administration was saying: "what is the problem? it is all there in the manual..." and then he showed 1984 book!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I remember back in my senior year
of high school when we were studying 1984, we all talked in class about how glad we were that we'd never have to deal with any of that, that we lived in a country where that would never happen.

Well, what a difference 21 years makes! I'm seeing things that I NEVER EVER EVER in a MILLION YEARS thought I'd see in this country, and it's so similar to so much in that book that it's beyond eerie. And I remember our teacher shaking her head at our naivete, saying that things like that could happen in ANY country, given the right set of circumstances and that you just never know, we needed to always be on our guard.

She then asked us how we knew that what we were told by the media and those around us was actually true? Good question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That is pretty heavy for a highschool teacher.
She's got to be a DUer now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yep, we studied 1984 in HS, too
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 09:52 AM by ixion
of course, this was in 1983... and at that point I already had a healthy distrust of government. Regan was president, and 1984 would be upon us soon, on sooo many levels. Only two years later, Ray-Gun started the 'War on Drugs' and Big Brother was born into this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Exactly, I studied it in
1983 as well, and I, too, was not too trustful of government, especially since I couldn't stand Raygun and knew he'd be trouble from the moment he was elected when I was fifteen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Passage from 1984....

Think about the Reagan's cozy relationshiop with Hussein and read this:


==========================
(From Chapter 3)


The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did that knowledge exist? Only in his own consciousness, which in any case must soon be annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past,' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.' And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. 'Reality control', they called it: in Newspeak, 'doublethink'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. that passage reminds me more of Bush II resealing all of
Reagan's papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Passage 2 from 1984

(From chapter 5)

The degradation of civil discussion and tolerance of opinion..

====

'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we're not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. War on terrorism
Doesn't the war against Eastasia/Eurasia look eerily similar to the war on terrorism? Every day, we find out about a new enemy - a new shadowy figure that's always just outside our grasp. One day, Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were our friends and we helped them with money and training. The next we're told that they're our enemies and have always been trying to destroy us. One day, Pakistan is our ally in the war on terror - the next, they are safe haven for terrorists. Fucking creepy if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. The war in Eurasia was a blueprint, of course
As the book was a manual.

Anyone who doesn't think the goal of this group is anything else then an Orwellian existence is sorely mistaken, IMHO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC