Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America should heed Clarke's warnings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 06:15 PM
Original message
America should heed Clarke's warnings
http://www.suntimes.com/output/greeley/cst-edt-greel02.html

Richard Clarke's Against All Enemies is one very scary book. Unlike most people who have an opinion on it, I've read the book.

It is understandable that the administration has become hysterical in its attacks on Clarke. If his account is accurate, then the president is a man of limited talents, capable of absorbing only simple proposals and surrounded by advisers from Cloud Cuckooland. Yet for all the viciousness of the assault, no one has explained why a registered Republican civil servant who has served in five administrations, three of them Republican, would write such a book unless he was genuinely worried about the state of the country. As for it being a partisan political book, it would have been published last November, a year before the election, if a security check on it was not deemed necessary. Clarke's story fits with that of Paul O'Neill, the former secretary of the Treasury, who describes the same kind of White House. One can only hope that enough Americans take seriously the possibility that Clarke is telling the truth before al-Qaida blows up some American commuter trains.

Even more scary is the implication of the book that Americans are not much safer than they were in August 2001. The two agencies with primary responsibility for security -- the CIA and the FBI -- are apparently paralyzed by bureaucratic concerns about their turf. The former in particular seems worse than useless and its computer system doesn't work very well, if at all. The Department of Homeland Security has no control over either agency and has become, as many predicted it would, a cumbersome monstrosity. Clarke suggests that the billions of dollars pumped into the Iraq war could have been spent notably improving the domestic war against terrorism or setting up a single police agency to deal specifically with domestic terrorism.

Apparently, Condoleezza Rice had never heard of al-Qaida when she came to the White House. Her major concern seemed to be that there were too many employees in the counter-terrorism group. The administration was not interested in such notions as the war on terror, which it had inherited from the previous administration. Rather, it worried about China and a missile defense system.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. gotta kick that one
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC