Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Dean bitch-slapping Dumbya big time on Diane Rheim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemLikr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:34 AM
Original message
John Dean bitch-slapping Dumbya big time on Diane Rheim
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 10:36 AM by DemLikr
just said Shrub can't testify alone because he doesn't understand his own white house policies.

that Cheney is the ACTUAL president.

said Bush is "shallow," that he simply repeats phrases over and over, that he is a symbolic head of state.

The overall message is that Shrub is an incurious, rude, arrogant dumbass.

Well, WE all knew that four years ago, but it's awesome to hear it said out loud on national radio.

I'm writing to thank Diane!

On edit: now Dean is adding that Shrub is a vicious, ruthless political operative who enjoys that side of things and uses Rove largely as a cover for his own machinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard him this morning
on Democracy Now with Amy Goodman. It was excellent! Worse than Watergate indeed!

The overall message is bigger than that. It's that Bush has done things that are CLEARLY impeachable offenses!

If only the mainstream media would take this and run with it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for the information. It is well presented and well received.
But could you please find another phrase besides "bitch-slap". It is an offensive, sexist term. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wish you were as concerned about Bush policies.
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 10:50 AM by mouse7
I couldn't help noticing that there was no criticism of Bush in your post, but criticism of the word "bitch."

I think that says volumes about the motivations at work here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. nothing bush does surprises me
at least not nearly as much is the insistance on using a term like bitch when it's pretty well known there are people who will object to it.

makes me wonder why? such an 'in your face' thing to do to people who are on your side in 99% of the arguements.

if i wanted a serious and focused discussion of a topic, i sure as hell would use the word bitch in the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. So, Bush behaves better than liberals here at DU.
Thank you. You couldn't have proved my point more than by saying Bush behavior is less "surprising" than some liberal allies here at DU because they use a word that general society uses that a few people here happen to not to like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. until bush uses the phrase 'bitch slap' in public
and then defends it's use as "interesting, fun and lively", well then yes...in this respect, bush has a leg up on some DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
135. it's basic respect
whether or not you think use of the word is trivial, the fact a lot of people object to the term ought to be enough of an incentive to not use it. That's just basic good manners and respect, nothing more, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
152. would should be wouldn't in the above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. ??????come on - do we have to 'discuss' AGAIN why this is offensive???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #35
49. no they know why some find it offensive

i'm thinking some may even sit around, bidding their time until they find an excuse to use it because it's so "interesting, fun and lively,

such a fun word..bitch. so full of empowerment when coupled with slap like it is here, in this context.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #49
117. hey bearfart...
I find your name offensive....so when are you going to change it. I also find you highjacking threads with your tiresome screeds about the word "bitch" How bout this? Build a flipping bridge...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #117
157. i've learned that being offensive is not a big deal here.
so in the words of those who defend bitch-slap, get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
178. My motivations are exactly what I stated. The term is offensive to me and
I will always take offensive to that and other demeaning terms. As to my criticism of bush, I work daily as a precinct chair and am now a state delegate to help us get rid of this freak. I have been screaming about him since before he defeated Anne here in Texas. I rode in a bus for 24+ hours to march triumphantly in the sleet and cold to let the world know what I thought of his non election. My mind, body and spirit work minute by minute to rid our nation of this scourge. None of this changes the fact the the term used was sexist, demeaning, counterproductive and WRONG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Bitch-slap"....is neither offensive nor sexist...
It is a turn of phrase..get used to it..Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think some people here need to sue Meriam-Webster and Oxford
When they are successful with legal action to remove certain words they disapprove of from the language, then people will stop using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. nigger and fag are in the dictionary
but civilized people don't use them lightly as the poster did in his thread title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
39. The N-word has a special taboo word usage notation
I have the huge Encarta Dictionary... because it was on sale. (story for another time)

Anyway, the n-word has taboo and offensive all over the entry for the n-word. "Fag" has 3 completely different usages, of which one is offensive. The others are it's use in the UK for something boring or a cigarette, neither of the latter two considered offensive in the UK.

"Bitch" has 7 different usages and only ONE is considered offensive.

You guys need to sue the dictionary makers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
160. you can get away with that tedious argument for bitch
but find the term bitch-slap in the dictionary.

oh damn merriam-webster hasn't given us permission to be a lout on that one has it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
53. Thanks bear
for speaking up on this. Funny that liberals would be so insensitive to so many people, even after being told repeatedly that a LOT of people on DU don't like the term. It's not like that's the only word in the language that can be used to say the same thing. And I'm sure I could think of lots of things to insert in

________-slapped


that would offend the people saying "get over it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #53
63. Complain to dictionary editors
Only one usage of the term "bitch" of seven is given a notation of offensive. This wasn't the offensive one.

I suggest you direct your campaign against the word to dictonary editors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. how is this not the offensive usage?
are you saying that the term "bitch-slap" refers to hitting a dog? You're nuts. This is precisely the offensive usage of the term. In this phrase, the "bitch" referred to is a woman (specifically, a prostitute being hit by her pimp, if I remember the etamology).

How can you make the case that this is not the offensive usage of the word? Even if there are six non-offensive usages, this clearly isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #71
84. Complain to dictionary editors
How come the term "George W. Bush" not considered offensive? I don't know. There just isn't agreement as a culture that "George W. Bush" is reasonable to consider insulting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #84
98. Man, you just jumped it there.
I perfectly refuted your assertion (posted several times) that the usage of "bitch-slap" wasn't the offensive usage, which it clearly is, and you respond with that?

As a fellow Danger Mouse fan, and (I assume, perhaps wrongly) a fellow hetero man- may I suggest that your whole life will get a lot better if you stop defending things that don't matter and start standing up for your sisters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #98
108. I stand up for free speech.
There is a group of people on this message board promoting a personal agenda that has noting to do with this discussion. That's what this is about.

The culture as a whole does not see these usages offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #108
118. ok. and back when the usage of
"kike" or "spic" wasn't considered offensive by culture as a whole, you would have happily used those phrases any chance you got, huh?

God forbid you have a higher sense of justice and morality that the culture as a whole...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #118
125. Take your Correctness Police stuff back to squadhouse
Seeing how many flames you correctness police officer can post on a thread was tedious the 200th time. Doing it more therefore will be more tedious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #125
139. let me make you a promise
everytime a knuckledragging moran with a freeper's soul wrapped in a liberal's skin uses the word bitch and i see it, i will exercise my freedom of speech to protest it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #139
145. And I promise to show dictionary entries when you force PCness
You're wrong about this, and I don't care home many threats of rants on threads you make, I'll point out that you are wrong. Flooding threads with rants is neither good argumentation nor accurate.

The referece books say you are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #145
154. You promise? Great!
I want to see this dictionary entry. You said six definitions are fine, on is offensive. Make good on you promiose and post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #154
159. I already did. I can't help it if you can read a thread.
The offensive tem relates directly to a woman's temperament. It is not considered an offensive usage when it only relates to female as slang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #159
161. sorry I'm impatient. shall we discuss over by #156 and replies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #159
174. "Cripple" is also in the dictionary
I believe this word has special meaning for you. Are jokes about this acceptable? Slurs about disabled people? You said anything in the dictionary is fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #174
179. Tedious.
*YAWN*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #53
66. no thanks necessary.
i have a five year old niece and i'm trying to create a world where she can be assertive and powerful and not be called a bitch for it.

as for other choices, attacks, exposes, ridicules, derides and that ole' DU favorite bashes, pop into mind as possible substitute but then again, they all have more than one syllable so that may be the issue here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #66
144. :-)
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. it's a turn of phrase that comes from a man slapping his bitch
you don't find that sexist or offensive?

wow.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. ""Bitch-slap"....is neither offensive nor sexist..."
What BS ~ It is both and doesn't need to be bandied about here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. what?
I'm a guy, not terribly "pc", but even I can see that bitch-slap is sexist. Fer pete's sake, it suggests that slapping your "bitch" is a specific type of action- deserving of its own name. If that's not entrenchment of violence against women, well then I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #32
56. Thank you, it's guys like you that make the world a better place
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 11:39 AM by Woodstock
I really appreciate your saying this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #32
59. thank you for saying that....
:toast: now only if more guys like you could see this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #59
67. Dictonary editors don't see it.
I'll take their word on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. fine, then you'll take their word on "faggot" "whore" "slut" "dyke"
"spic" and "wetback" just because those words didn't merit a "special consideration of its racist or sexist use" in the dictionary. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #69
78. Tedious, tedious, tedious.
The 201st time posted is more tedious than the 200th posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #78
82. the 201st time defending sexist terms like these gets more
amazing and shows a lack of understanding on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:56 AM
Original message
Right. Dictionary editors don't understand words. Sure.
Believe it or not, I consider the highly educated editors of the various highly regarded dictionaries of the English language to be more expert in matters of word usage than you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
124. see posts #121 and #118
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #124
140. Dictionary says this usage not offensive
You point to #121 as if the argument hasn't been disproved over and over again. The usage in question is not considered offensive by dictionaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #140
153. post it, man.
you said one of your entries WAS an offensive usage. Post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #153
162. I did a while ago. You're lack of reading comprehension is your issue.
The offensive usage relates directly to a woman's temperament. The slang usage as relating to female is not considered offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #162
163. LOL! My lack of...
Geez, just come over to #156 and we can work this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #163
167. Yes... which is made clear with multiple posts after I posted request n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #167
173. uh huh. the one above I posted a full 1 minute after you responded
Where is my reading comprehension? I must be a total idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #67
100. people are people with feelings. dictionaries are books with/out feelings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #67
112. "Dictionary editors, yada yada." Jeez! If you aren't going to use...
...your own brains, why should anyone pay attention to anything else you have to say?

There are plenty of ways in the English language to say waht you wanted to say. Is it so tough to admit that that particular phrase may not have been the best one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #32
72. It is a phrase that deals with two women fighting each other...
..the slap each other because they (women) don't punch with their fists....

I'm sorry but if some here get bent out of shape about the word bitch I wonder what would happen when someone uses REALLY big words....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #72
88. bullshit
the pimp slaps the woman with an open hand so to not damage the merchandise and reduce her earning potential

your thinking of chick fight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #88
96. No I am not...
Oh, and BULLSHIT back at ya.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. the poster is correct. your definition is not accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #101
110. The term is not considered offensive in dictionaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #110
121. what happened to your assertion of a moment ago:
that there is one usage out of seven that IS offensive. Did that entry vanish from your dictionary in the last few minutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #121
128. 6 are not considered offensive
This was not the usage in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #128
131. It CLEARLY was. Are you saying the phrase refers to hitting a dog?
It CLEARLY refers to hitting a woman who is your property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #131
146. Dictionary says it's not. Go away with the PC police bit.
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 12:25 PM by mouse7
The term is not considered offensive in the dictionary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #146
148. come on then, don't hold back
you said one of the seven entries in your holy dictionary IS offensive, so have the guts to post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #148
155. I already did
I can't help it if you have no patience to wait for it to be posted a couple of minutes.

The offensive term is relatinbg to a woman's temperament.

It's not considered offensive to use just in relation to female as slang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #155
158. I'm on it. See #156
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #101
134. Which poster? Because I KNOW I'm right...
besides...all of my bitches are ho's...//sarcasm off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #134
147. Well, this'll be a hard one to crack.
I'd like to see a poll on whether most DUers think the phrase "bitch-slap" originates with two women fighting, as you assert, or with a pimp smacking his prostitute, as I assert.

I'm as sure I'm right as you are, but it'll be real hard to find any solid etamology. At least with a poll we'll get the common understanding of the term, which is the relevant question, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. proving once again why liberals aren't taken seriously (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. By whom???
I take liberals seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. proving that there is a contingent at DU who insists on using
the word bitch even though they know it's use offends other DUers.

i have never been able to figure out the true motivation for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Uptightness about language offends me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. DYKE!WHORE!SLUT!BITCH!
When I shout them, those words are offensive. They have the power to strike at me, because I'm a woman, and seeing a word like "bitch" puts down my gender. They are the same as racial epithets to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Ahh yes, the Slinkerwink "DYKE!WHORE!SLUT!BITCH!" quote
It's old. It had an effect a few times, but no longer does the 200th time. You've run this rant into the ground Slinkerwink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
38. gee....you don't find those words
"interesting, fun and lively?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. I find this particular "glued" usage by Slinkerwink now tedious
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 11:33 AM by mouse7
Slinkerwink now throwing that "glued" megecurse up on reflex. It was interesting the first few times. It's old the 200th time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. the point is still there.
:shrug: it's not my fault that some people here can be blind to how words like "bitch" are a major slap in the face to women here who object to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. Complain to dictonary editors
Only 1 of 7 usages of the word "bitch" in my brand new Encarta Dictionary is considered offensive by them

I suggest you aim your anger where it might be more effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #58
68. it's not the dictionary editors we're complaining about---it's about
the word "bitchslap" used by the original poster. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #68
94. Dictionary editors say the term is not offensive
Live with that. This is your own personal sensitivities, not the cultures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #94
150. post it.
you said one of the seven entries in you dictionary is offensive. Bring it on, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #150
165. #156
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. ever consider that the insistance on using bitch slap,
when the word exposed is more accurate gets tedious too? especially for the 200th time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
75. Dictionary editors say you're wrong
If a term isn't considered offensive in English language dictionaries, I would suggest that the discussion is tedious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. look at post #71
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #79
99. I did. She's wrong. Dictionary editors say term isn't offensive.
Only a small group of people here on the DU board are promoting this. It is not how the culture as a whole feels about the usage of the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #99
111. First of all, I'm a "he".
And hetero, too. Secondly, the only reason there are only five of six of us doing this right now is because we're the ones who happen to have time this fine Tuesday. I guarantee there are boatloads of lefties who find your line of reasoning wrong.

And I'll grant that there are boatloads who would agree with you. For fairness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #111
120. Dictionaries are the statndard reference of word usage
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 12:12 PM by mouse7
They say the term isn't offensive.

I'll stand with the standard reference accepted by society.

The Correctness Police stuff has gotten old when dictionaries aren't even accepted as a reference for word usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #120
123. see post #121
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #123
132. You were wrong in #121, too
The dictonary does not consider this word usage to be offensive no matter how many way you try to fracture the argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #132
141. Ok, give it to me.
You state that your precious dictionary lists 7 definitions and that one is deemed offensive. Do you have the guts to type out just what the offensive definition is, according to your sacred tome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #141
151. The offensive usage of bitch...
insulting a women's temperament

The usage in regards to female (slang) IS NOT considered offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #151
156. So if I say a woman is:
"acting like a bitch", that's offensive. But if I say a woman "is a bitch", that's not offensive?

Is that what your dictionary says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #156
166. Yes, if the "is a bitch" only relates to being female
If temperament is not part of the discussion, it's not considered offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #166
170. so...
I can call my boss, mom, wife- all bitches as long as I am refering to their genders, not their temperments? And if they get offended, that's their probelm, because using the term to descibe a woman (as long as temperment is not part of the discussion) is empirically not offensive.

That's your assertion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #170
175. Some people don't like slang.
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 12:52 PM by mouse7
It's your call as to how able you are to use slang and talk informally with those you interact with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #99
133. The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?ook=Dictionary&va=bitchslap&x=17&y=10

so how is it that you found 'bitchslap' to be declared not offensive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #133
143. Conversely how did you declare it to be offensive??
Because YOU say so???

Riiiiiiiight....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #143
171. look up the word offensive
2 : giving painful or unpleasant sensations : NAUSEOUS, OBNOXIOUS <offensive odor of garbage>
3 : causing displeasure or resentment


you really think the protesters here are not expressing displeasure or resentment at the use of the word? it seems clear that we find the word nauseous and obnoxious.

if you live by the dictionary you die by the dictionary. since i have proved that many of your compatriots are offended by the word, will you continue it's use? what other words do you intentionally use to offend people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #133
168. It relates simply to female, not female temperament
Female temperament is the offensive usage. Female (slang) usage that doesn't relate specifically to temperament is not offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
60. Amen, slinkerwink
I'm sure if we thought maybe a second, we could find something to use in

_______-slapped

to push mouse7's and all the other "get over it" people's buttons.

But let's be big about this and not put each other down.

That term has negative and even dangerous connotations for a gender. There are many other terms that could be used that would not do this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
169. Since my previous reply to your message got deleted...
...for reasons unknown to me -- other than refreshing your memory with more words you could add to your chain -- personally, I think it was an error by moderators, unless they can point out to me what specific rule I broke (I'd appreciate a reply here or in a PM, whichever) -- let me try this again.

Racial epithets don't offend me either. RacISM offends me. Though it may be true that racial epithets are most often, but not always, used in tandem with racism -- it isn't the words themselves that offend me, but the substance behind them. It isn't a certain sequence of syllables, but a certain sentiment. If the words are vehicles to express racism, then the racism is offensive; if not, then to call them offensive just because they are from your personal verbal hit-list is, I believe, not consistent with liberalism and free speech.

I actually think that the PC movement has set back the struggle for equality, not moved it forward. This whole idea that as long as we go through the motions and avoid certain phrases and certain mannerisms, we're in the clear, is ludicrous. All that does is push these things under the carpet where they are not as visible, but fester nevertheless. You know all those "BUT" people? "I'm not a racist/sexist/homophobe BUT..." (then insert: I'm not comfortable with homosexual or interracial marriages, I don't think women were made for certain jobs, etc). Well, they readily obey your verbal hygiene. Still they are offensive to me. And you know what else? Even though they're offensive to me, I would protect their right to hold those sentiments and freely express them. And then there will be a debate about them, as opposed to the endless status quo maintained by this PC aesthetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. Sounds more like bitching to me.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #42
52. Complain to the dictionary makers
There are 7 usages for the word "bitch" and only one is considered offensive.

The one in discussion in this thread isn't the one considered offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. ha, is that all you can come up with to defend the sexism of the word
"bitchslap?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #61
116. I'll stand with dictionaries for word usage.
You can't rant and incite and insult all you wish. I'll use the same reference book the rest of the culture uses on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #116
126. see posts #121 and #118
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #52
80. find the definition of the word in context. "bitch-slap"
it's not in my version although i'll take a stab at it:

bitch-slap
verb
origin: knukledraggers and sexist misogynists
meaning: 1.to slap a woman who you regard as your property 2. to slap a man as you would slap a woman who you regard as property


we gotta fight
for the right
to say biiiiitch-slap!

</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #52
176. I wasn't complaining. Just commenting on the posters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. No... a contingent more concerned about a word than Bush
This isn't about a word. This is about being concerned about a word and comparatively unconcerned about Bush. It's a question about misplaced priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. it's an unecessary word in this context (and in most contexts)
all any poster has to do is use a different phrase and the focus would be entirely on bush's policies. but i guess some people don't have the vocabulary or word skills to pull that off.

or else they get their jollies by making light of women being beaten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
44. Please don't use this tactic.
Obviously, some people posting here take a different position than yours. You are offended. But your response is offensive to me, because you are now implying that people who disagree on the use of the word "bitch" show a lack of vocabulary/word skills or enjoyment of violence against women.

Please do not characterize my thoughts. It is just possible that I disagree with you for what I consider a good reason, and that, even if I would prefer not to offend you, I cannot avoid doing so if I do not share your premises.

State what you feel, but don't stoop to smearing those of us who feel differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #44
51. you want to not get into a big discussion about word/phrase usage?
Try not using phrases that many people find offensive, just because some other people don't and you think you have to stand up for the rights of... of what? Of the phrase? I just don't get it. It is entirely appropriate for any person to ask you to stop using terminology that degrades thier race/gender/religion. You don't want to, fine. But don't pretend its because the phrase itself isn't offensive. The real reason the user doesn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
105. well, i'm between a rock and a hard place
i can assume that people on a liberal message board are either:

insensitive, crude, endorsers of terms that references violence against women and defends it's use as being interesting, fun and lively.

or

that they have a poor command of the language and lack the necessary skills to come up with another term.



i prefer the second choice. a lack of word skills is easier to remedy than a lack of a liberal soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #105
172. The remedy is for you to stop telling other what to do
The quickest solution is for you to stop trying to control the actions of others an unnecessarily moralize like a right-winger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
37. ?????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. the motivation: we don't care that it offends you
That's pretty much it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. which makes me wonder who taught you about liberalism or
what the hell your definition of it is?

making light of women being beaten doesn't fit in my definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. for real
I can understand using a phrase that one doesn't realize is deragatory, but to adamantly defend your usage in the face of clear reasoning why it sucks? Bizarre, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #45
122. I haven't seen any clear reasoning that it's derogatory
just emotional reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
109. "liberalism" does not mean saying "boo" everytime someone claims offense
I feel that particularly term can be offensive in some contexts but not in others. They are just words; they only have the emotional impact we assign to them.

If I was teaching kindergarten I would be concerned about hurting feelings, but I thought we were all adults in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
65. Instead of focusing on the post some get all bent out of shape..
about a phrase...

How pathetic......

No wonder liberals are laughed at...

Whilst we're concentrating on PC speech the reich-wing is busy looting the treasury, raping the environment (Ooops..can i say "rape"???:eyes:) and stripping us of our rights...

Lets' keep our eyes on the prize, and grow a thicker skin....

Some people just need to get over themselves.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #65
73. nah----us women just need to "get over" words like BITCH, SLUT, WHORE,
and DYKE, and other sexist words that perpetuates SEXISM....:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #73
85. Yes you do.....
They are simply words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #85
114. 'simply words'??????? what world do you live in where words are simple????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #65
90. if you can't see how language is one of the most effective-
-methods of entrenching repression, altering people's perspective and generally affecting thought in the populace as a whole, then you aren't paying attention to the methods of the right wing.

Language is powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
130. Absolutely...
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 12:28 PM by pjeffrey4444
not that I care what the Freepers say but my God they must have fun reading this sophomoric crap. As I said above...build a bridge. I'm a gay man and you can call me faggot, queer , cocksucker or whatever you want and it that's just fine. I am in fact all of the above however my selfimage is healthy and I don't let people using ugly word have power over me. The way "bitch slapped" was used in the thread title was amusing and well used as far as Im concerned and Im completely sick and tired of these jerks highjacking good threads to insert their own ridiculous agenda. If you're all so damned concerned start a thread with that as the subject and pursue it that way.

On edit...WOW I just discovered the IGNORE feature...I have lots of work to do...let's see...BEARSFARTINTHEWOODS....WOODSTOCK....etc. etc....when I'm dont maybe I can then see what the reason of this thread really is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemLikr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. No thanks. I'm fine with "bitch-slap."
To each his or her own way of expressing him or herself...it's part of what keeps our language interesting, fun and lively.

Now, what are your comments on the substance of my post?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. At least you know...
...that he/she ain't gonna be bitch-slapping you about the substance of your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. sorry, i can't get beyond the title
i try to get excited about someone saying something that we all know already but it pales in significance to the loss of the soul of liberalism which is what i see when people insist on using a term that expressly translates into violence against women and then defends it's use as interesting, fun and lively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
41. Your post lost all substance with your use of such offensive language
You are on the verge of losing any credibility at all. Why do you insist upon offending so many people here? It serves no purpose that I can ascertain and could end up getting you placed on many ignore lists. In fact I think the rules are pretty plain about vulgar offensive language in posts and especially subject lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katarina Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
115. Oh for gods sakes!
This is beyond ridiculous now! I stayed out of the other "bitch" threads but please, because someone uses the phrase "bitch-slap" they lose all credibility? OMFG!
There are plenty of things posted on this board that could be considered vulgar/offensive to people. Would you prefer that we go all Laura Bush/stepford wife and just not speak? We all talk differently. We were all raised differently. How the hell is the Democratic party supposed to become united when we can't even get past the reality that some of us that say the word bitch? Some of us take the lords name in vain...some of us use the word fuck often...It's a freaking word. I say Ann Coulter is a bitch...sorry but that is not calling slinkerwink one as well. :eyes: It was a sentence about Ann Coulter only.
This topic was supposed to be about John Dean...but instead we have to go through the whole tired bla-bla bla about this word or that word or this phrase being offensive crap! So once again Bush wins because some users decide a word pertains to them every time it is used and so the attention is taken off the fact that someone else has came out and said Bush is an idiot.
We are never going to get anywhere if people keep focusing on trivial little things like this instead of the issues....you know, unemployment, outsourcing, Iraq and getting that asshole out of our White House. (I am sure someone out there is also offended by the word asshole...oh well.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #115
129. I don't consider this trivial
And it wasn't just the word bitch that was used. It was Bitch-slapped. In the first place I don't go along with slapping anyone at any time and the second it is extremely demeaning of women in that it is acceptable that they should be slapped. What if the term was wife-slapped. Would that bother anyone? It is terribly offensive and I am amazed at so many so-called "Liberals" that condone such activity and terminoligy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katarina Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #129
136. Could you explain to me
the meaning of the word liberal please?

And I consider this whole discussion trivial. This http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x467984 is not trivial. This discussion is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digno dave Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
93. gee, i wonder where liberals get their whiney-ass reputation from.
I agree.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
48. Agree, it's offensive and sexist
Also shows very little imagination. It's not hard to think of something more descriptive to use instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #48
57. exactly---it's too easy to put down women by using gender-specific insults
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. John W. Dean said the same thing on NOW with Bill Moyers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
34. Dean also said, "He's as good as his script" of *, but he can't
even do that. what a mess he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. I ordered Dean's book. Should come tomorrow!
I can't wait! I think this is yet another nail in the Bush coffin. Remember, John Dean was the BIG nail in Nixon's coffin too! I think that gives credibility to his words!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. An "incurious, rude, arrogant dumbass" leader would be representative
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 11:08 AM by ElementaryPenguin
Of today's Amerika, I'm afraid! U.S. getting the government it now deserves?

:shrug:

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemLikr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Sadly, I pretty much agree, Penguin.
This country is full of willfully ignorant fools, too many of which choose to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why can'nt Craig Ungers book.House of bush* House of Saud
get the same attention? He is very respected investigative journalist and editor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. He said much the same to either Russert or Tweety, can't remember who
but he was on one of the programs the other day really laying it on the line about these morons. Awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
25. For anyone with a brain
Dean spelled the situation we are in out loud on Keith Oberman last night - he sees where all this is going - and he is worried about what little "democracy" we have left - as he said - one more terrorist attack and we can kiss our Constitution and Bill of Rights goodbye. THIS is the issue - not the use of the word bitch-slap, fucking ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. what program was that?
trying to find the transcripts...

thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #43
55. Countdown on MSNBC
Keith Oberman, it was good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #55
74. thanks!
why did I think he was CNN? :shrug:

maybe if I watched occasionally I would know! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #74
83. If you get the transcript
you may want to seperately post his statements re basically the fact that they plan for the US to be under martial law. Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #83
86. printing it out now...
after I read it I'll post the relevant parts, unless someone beats me to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. As Dean once worked for a "rude, arrogant dumbass", I will trust his
judgement that * is one also. As for the "incurious" part, that's trueas well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
33. His interview with Amy Goodman this a.m. was the same.
He told the truth about the Accidental President. I loved the part where he said Bush* was ignorant. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
46. I object to your thread title - how offensive
You could have said that a thousand other ways than that. And those words would have packed just as strong a punch - but not offended so many people. Let's see, I'm sure I could find something to insert in the blanks of this statement that YOU would not like - but I won't use it. I wish you'd shown me the same courtesy.

_______-slapped

Let's see, what would DemLikr not like me to use in the blank? I bet lots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #46
62. Can we please get back to discussion of Dean's book?
This is why we Democrats can't ever seem to get it together and battle the common enemy: we're too busy battling one another over petty stuff like words someone might find offensive!

Now back to John Dean's book: He was interviewed last night (Monday) on MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann (who gave the book a hearty endorsement-Thanks Keith!). He really laid it on the line about how the Bush administration has used "in the interest of national security" to take away our freedoms one by one. How they are far more corrupt than the Watergate folks ever dared to be and what we will very likely lose if Bush & Co. are re-elected--which he no doubt will be if we can't get our &^%$ together and focus on what's really important: Sending Shrub back home to Texas in November!

The transcripts of the interview should be up on the MSNBC website later this afternoon. Go to www.msnbc.com, then to MSNBC TV, then to Countdown. The link to the transcripts will be there. Read them and then go out and buy the book!

Remember, this man is yet another Republican coming forward with serious and well-thought out concerns of the Bush Administration. Sooner or later, this stuff has to start registering with the Repugs and the Independents out there that this administration is not to be trusted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. what if the original poster had said "faggot-slapped?"
would you consider that a petty word? The fact is that "bitch-slapped" is like "faggot-slapped" to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #64
70. Who's Us?
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 11:49 AM by TNOE
I'm a female and it didn't and doesn't bother me in the least. I think our situation is dire enough that frankly we don't have time to worry about our delicate "sensibilities". As a woman, I use the term quite frequently, its just a phrase. As a matter of fact - I actually DID bitch-slap someone down last weekend, felt great.
Faggots usually call themselves that in jest - just get over it - and yes, let's get back on the topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #70
76. I've started another thread so we can actually discuss the book. . .
not the term Bitch. I'm a woman btw, and I use the words Bitch, bitch-slapped, and bitching quite frequently. I do not find it offensive. What I do find offensive is that we're discussing this nonsense when we could be discussing something more important!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #70
77. it's okay for women and minorities to lessen the damage of those
words by coopting them into a positive context, like african-americans owning the word "n*gger," and so forth. However, when a male of the dominant class uses the word "bitch" in any context, it is perpetuating sexism. Just like a white man would in using the word "n*gger" casually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
97. You are in the minority of females
A majority of us on DU object to this term - as we have demonstrated in countless threads. Some have left over it's repeated allowance here. I'm considering it now myself. Don't worry, TNOE, maybe some day it will be just you and the insensitive guys here, and you can talk about "the subject" all you want.

As for me, I'm glad the decent guys spoke up for the majority of us women who object to this term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #70
138. LOL...faggot here and proud of it!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #64
81. This is just SOOOOOOOOOOO stupid...
...Unreal....Simply un-friggin' real....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #81
87. Transcript of Countdown interview is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
127. That would be a 'sissy slap'
and trust me, they hurt like hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
89. This thread is a perfect lesson
in why not to use the term in question------IF
you want people to focus on the issue and not the
term. A perfect lesson perfectly unlearned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. Yup, self-censorship is SOOOOOOOO much better than
government censorship right? What's the difference if BOTH impedes free speech??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #95
103. since when does free speech = being offensive??????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #95
106. Nah, civilization trumps censorship
It's called being considerate of each other.

It's NOT hard to do. REALLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #95
119. What's the difference
between discussing the issue at hand, which
the thread-starter apparently wanted to discuss,
and discussing a term used in presenting the issue?
Just on a practical, pragmatic level, the use of
the term is self-defeating.
Again:
Perfect Lesson, Perfectly Unlearned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
91. b*tch, f*ggot, ni**er. ewwwwwwwww. yuck. what a thread this is.
thought the freepers broke in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #91
149. i just noticed that the person who started the thread hasn't
responded to it. isn't that the definition of a hit and run disruption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chango Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
92. Who's this bitch, Diane Rheim?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #92
102. Thanks for proving my point
See what we've attracted to DU?

Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mellowinman Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
104. I would've liked to read about the Dean interview.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #104
113. It's easy - post a thread without a gender-offensive title
And you'll get a discussion about your topic.

Throw around slurs, and you'll get objections.

If you need some hints about words to replace:

{insert ethinic, gender, racial, sexual-oriented group}-slapped

Then I'll be glad to provide, oh, say 100 alternatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #113
142. Someone did, noone replied
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 12:24 PM by camero
It seems everyone just wants to discuss a term. :eyes:

On edit: Oh 2 replies in an hour

Here:http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1353602
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
107. As I tried to convey, I went to and read your post because I thought it
was interesting and important in our battle against *bush and company. I found and still find your use of "that" term sexist, degrading and HARMFUL to women and thereby to us all. I wanted you to know this. I really have a difficult time with someone defending an obvious, if nothing else, very contentious term that lessens the important information that was being imparted. Here to me is a good test of what one is saying or doing: "Is this a term you would want to teach your youngster to use?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
137. Reading all the "I'm Offended" replies
makes me feel like I'm listening to Bill O'Reilly and/or Sean Hannity - seems like "fake" outrage to me. Maybe some of these posters have other issues that I don't. I'm a woman and I can take it when and if someone calls me a bitch - maybe its deserved, maybe it isn't and when I do the same to another woman. Good thing you all probably missed Jon Stewart last night to hear what he called Juror #4 - lighten up - the world is not going to go to hell in a handbasket because we cuss or use certain words to describe someone or something but what I CAN guarantee you is - the world is definitely going to hell in a handbasket because of Bush* and his administration, 9/11, the Iraq war, Afghanistan, the poppy's, the looting of the Treasury and SS, etc. I guess we can all discuss our likes and dislikes when we're in the concentration camps - we'll have time for this discussion then I'm sure - and meanwhile the righteous religious right will have taken over the country and it will be illegal to use these terms - then perhaps that will make you happy.

P.S. - I've always avoided the "bitch" threads because I only have so much time to lurk and post and refuse to waste my time normally on nonsensical bullshit. (no offense to bulls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #137
164. That's funny, reading the "Get over it" replies
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 12:45 PM by Woodstock
makes me feel like I'm listening to Bill O'Reilly and/or Sean Hannity.

A large number of women (and some great men) on DU find this term offensive. They don't find ALL terms offensive. Just a very small number of terms that have negative connotations about a gender and in this case, trivialize violence toward women. No, I know you don't think so. You think it's a cool term and wouldn't mind if it was put in big letters in signs all across the interstate system. But the fact is a lot of us on DU - and I'm finding out just how many - find a small number of terms offensive toward genders, races, ethnic groups, and homosexuals. So for us to ask that this small number of terms please not be used is quite reasonable.

I know that there is a term I could use that you would find offensive. I KNOW IT. I don't know you well enough, but if I pay attention to you, I'm sure I could find this term out. But would I use it? NO. NO. NO. It's just basic respect. I don't know you, but if I have 1,000 alternative words at my disposal, I'm sure going to use them instead of deliberately offending you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #164
177. Seriously - isn't this EXACTLY how Bill O'Reily and
Sean Hannity act. Get all bent out of shape when someone doesn't agree with them or doesn't see things they same way they do - they disrupt, change the subject and fein outrage.

Actually - I have already "raised" my child who is 21, engaged, working 2 jobs and going to nursing school - she has amazingly excelled in our liberal home environment. And you know what - most words I heard of first were from her - hey mom, ever hear of a "skank", ever hear this or that - and I'd be like no, WHAT does that mean - and she'd tell me and we'd laugh. Again, using the term "what will we teach the children" sounds very Repug to me - and again, very O'Reily.

Maybe its because I was never a prostitute who worked for pimps so I was never bitch-slapped down by one, maybe if I had walked in that person's shoes I might find it offensive but then I'd have to figure I saw so much rotten shit that the least of my worries would be if anyone used that term. To ask "anyone or any group" to NOT do something is not your place - people on this board (speking for myself) are tired of all the bullshit that is now America and as I've said - we've got much bigger issues. This sounds like more right-wing Christian bullshit to me - political correctness and Praise Halleuigh and pass the ammunition.

No, honestly, there is NOTHING you could call me that I could possibly take offense to. I have too much respect for myself, I'm too proud of my accomplishments and I'm way too damn smart to be offended by anything anyone could possibly say. I've been on right-wing boards and was called "commie", drug smoking hippie, crackhead, etc. Words cannot and do not hurt me, impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
180. Locking
this has turned into one big flame fest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC