My heart just sank..
wtf
(273 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:41 PM
Original message
NewHampster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is really beginning
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
rumguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. wait, wait, wait, wtf is this?
NewHampster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. there's been major warfare all day
Marines went into Falujja with Bayonets
rumguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 130 soldiers dead? I find that hard to believe...
NewHampster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:46 PM
Original message
I don't know about the numbers but look here
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Yes. It's called fuzzy math. 130 dead to avenge 4. 700 plus..
dead to avenge one (bush 4) :puke:
hippiegranny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Guy Whitey Corngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I hear they're not crdeible. Who knows?
jadedcherub
(367 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
not very, i've heard sky news is sketchy. there was a CNN confirmed report of 12 dead, I'm thinking that's probably a typo, 130 for 13...
lectrobyte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. that's probably on both sides -- I've seen reports that say...
100 Iraquis and a dozen U.S. Soldiers. Still too many, on either side.
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Murdoch-owned global satellite news network
more credible than FOX, and wouldn't report something this negative unless there were no way around it.
Teddy_Salad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
I was watching CNN a short while ago and could not believe what they had scrolling along the bottom of the screen."Fewer than 12 US troops killed in Iraq". They'll obviously have to update it to....."Fewer than 150 US troops killed in Iraq."
Gothic Sponge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
I don't think we will ever get the real truth about how many actual troops have been killed. Maybe years later after the war we will know.
mindfulNJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe they're reporting 130 dead
so we are relieved when its revised to "only" 13.:eyes:
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. What? I'm watching CNN. But I haven't seen these numbers..
reported. Wonder why. :eyes:
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue Apr-06-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Okay, at 7:29pm cst they are saying it's 12.
Well I guess that's better but unfortunately not for the 12. p.s. I love that cartoon pic of bush and cheney.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.