Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charlie Rose (Thu 4/8): Sanger, Isikoff, and Pincus on Rice's testimony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 01:34 PM
Original message
Charlie Rose (Thu 4/8): Sanger, Isikoff, and Pincus on Rice's testimony
http://www.charlierose.com/index.shtm

4/8/2004  

A DISCUSSION ABOUT THE TESTIMONY OF
NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER CONDOLEEZZA RICE
with
9-11 Commission Member
SLADE GORTON
Former Senator (R-WA)
DAVID SANGER, The New York Times
MICHAEL ISIKOFF, Newsweek
WALTER PINCUS, The Washington Post

Email your questions on tonight's topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. starting soon in many markets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bet they whitewash it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. amazingly.....not Isikioff!
he was BRUTAL on CIA, other intel failings, including THIS:

on about June 21, CIA guy briefed FBI guys--showed them PICTURES of the one behind the Cole bombing, AND two highjackers at that meeting in Indonesia


THEN, they reFUSED to tell the FBI WHO THEY WERE......said they weren't authorized!

Isikoff said it was a VERY heated meaning, and was especially bad, because this was the HEIGHT of the WH alert situation, and SHOWS the utter breakdown in anti-terror communications

he cited several scenarios leading up to this, each time prefacing them with "and what makes it WORSE!"

devestating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. This was on Charlie Rose?
Was Rose annoyed? He tends to have a low threshhold for deviations from the establishment club line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Rose is always poor on criticism of the administration.
Don't plan on watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not this time ... Isikoff was ripping Rice on earlier shows
I'm expecting to hear a trio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. did you hear Isikoff? was he AFTER it, or what?
I missed the rest

Sanger has turned out to be, recently, quite the little stenographer

not as egregious as Bumiller (been reading the Daily Howler and other sources on how she's attached by mouth to Karen Hughes alimentary canal), but pretty credulous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Last half was the new Vanity Fair article on how Afghanistan morphed ...
... into Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC