Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Is This On Page 5 Of The Washington Post?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:25 AM
Original message
Why Is This On Page 5 Of The Washington Post?
First the link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A387-2004Apr9.html?referrer=email

Now the first two paragraphs:

"The classified briefing delivered to President Bush five weeks before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks featured information about ongoing al Qaeda activities within the United States, including signs of a terror support network, indications of hijacking preparations and plans for domestic attacks using explosives, according to sources who have seen the document and a review of official accounts and media reports over the past two years.




The information on current threats in the briefing, titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.," stands in contrast to repeated assertions by national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and other Bush administration officials as recently as this week that the document is primarily historical and includes no warning or threat information."

And now I'm sitting here wondering why this wasn't the headline item, taking up all of the front page?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry, when the thing is actually released ---

all hell will break lose (again).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be SO redacted, they will have to send an intern to
Staples to buy a whole carton of fresh Sharpies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Front Page
...its on the front page of the Columbus Dispatch here in Columbus, Ohio with the title "August 6th Briefing had al-Qaida plot in it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. why were the Halliburton contracts on page 32 in October 2002?
because the Washington Post, while the best we've got, is GARBAGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They need to know that we've relegated them
to bird cage liner...WHEN someone else wants to recycle newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because page 6 was probably all ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. well, it was on the front page of the NYTimes...
President Bush was told more than a month before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that supporters of Osama bin Laden planned an attack within the United States with explosives and wanted to hijack airplanes, a government official said Friday.

The warning came in a secret briefing that Mr. Bush received at his ranch in Crawford, Tex., on Aug. 6, 2001. A report by a joint Congressional committee last year alluded to a "closely held intelligence report" that month about the threat of an attack by Al Qaeda, and the official confirmed an account by The Associated Press on Friday saying that the report was in fact part of the president's briefing in Crawford.

The disclosure appears to contradict the White House's repeated assertions that the briefing the president received about the Qaeda threat was "historical" in nature and that the White House had little reason to suspect a Qaeda attack within American borders.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. front page, saginaw mi
Edited on Sat Apr-10-04 10:18 AM by greenman3610
Saginaw(MI) News, here in flyover country.
front page, top.
"US Knew Plot Vaguely"
followed by the AP article.

this will continue to get out. It's just going
to sink in deeper this weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC