Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Riverside/SanBernardino County DRE woes.. (Money & Recounts)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 07:58 PM
Original message
Riverside/SanBernardino County DRE woes.. (Money & Recounts)
Edited on Mon Apr-12-04 07:58 PM by SoCalDem
http://www.pe.com/localnews/riverside/stories/PE_News_Local_recount12.9fe25.html

County seeks aid for recount

SUPERVISORS: The board will be asked to hire outside lawyers because of a candidate's letter.

08:57 AM PDT on Monday, April 12, 2004


By MICHAEL CORONADO / The Press-Enterprise

In a move to preempt a possible legal fight challenging Riverside County's electronic voting machines, County Counsel Bill Katzenstein will ask the board of supervisors on Tuesday to hire an outside law firm specializing in election matters.The move comes in response to a seven-page letter sent to the county registrar's office by Linda Soubirous, asking for a manual recount in the March 2, District 1 supervisorial race, which she lost to incumbent Bob Buster. The letter outlines 44 different requests for notes, logs, tapes and other information related to the voting machines and the March election. In addition, Soubirous has hired a law firm to represent her interests during the recount.

snip.....

"There is certainly exposure to litigation," Rank said. "This is a relatively new area. We've never dealt with this. Bill (Katzenstein) felt it appropriate to address it upfront." Three four-member boards began the recount Thursday. They finished manually recounting paper ballots on Friday and this week will continue counting electronic ballots cast on the county's 4,250 Sequoia voting terminals. In the 1st District race, Buster narrowly avoided a November runoff by one-tenth of a percentage point. Of the 49,196 votes cast, Buster received 50.10 percent of the total, or 24,647 votes. Soubirous received 16,971 votes and former Lake Elsinore Mayor Kevin Pape received 7,578 votes.

The county's electronic voting machines and security procedures have come under heavy scrutiny by Soubirous supporters and Web sites critical of electronic voting systems. In addition, the recount comes in the midst of controversy surrounding electronic voting systems across Southern California.

snip.....

In San Bernardino County, elections officials did not properly prepare a computer to process the results. It took hours before any numbers could be posted from the $13.8 million touch-screen voting system. Still, the Riverside County electronic voting machines have proven error-safe, Registrar Mischelle Townsend said. According to Townsend, there have been no glitches and no incidents that have hampered any election since the the electronic machines' 2000 debut, Townsend said.





http://www.pe.com/localnews/sanbernardino/stories/PE_News_Local_bsupes12.9fb00.html

Vote machine money at risk
COUNTY: Officials worry that promised funds may be held back due to state concerns over tallies.

11:57 PM PDT on Sunday, April 11, 2004


The Press-Enterprise

San Bernardino County's Registrar of Voters voiced concerns Friday that state politicians might unplug the county's new $14 million electronic voting system. Registrar Scott Konopasek said hearings in Sacramento April 21 and 22 may force voting system changes that could cost San Bernardino County taxpayers more than $1 million. The county would have to spend that much to buy paper ballots and ballot-reading machines and to replace the ballot boxes and voting booths made obsolete when it switched to touch-screen voting machines.

Problems tallying votes in the March election in Orange, San Diego and Alameda counties problems have prompted two state senators to introduce SB 1723 to ban machines used in Riverside, San Bernardino and 12 other California counties.

snip......


About 40 percent of Californians voted on touch-screen machines in the March primary election. The Sequoia brand of voting machines used in Riverside and San Bernardino counties worked well, both counties' registrars have said. Mistakes preparing the machines to count the votes delayed results from the March primary election in San Bernardino County.

A hearing on SB 1723 is April 21. On that day and the 22nd, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley will also have hearings on what voting equipment should be used in November.

Staff writer Michael Coronado contributed to this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Heads up California
Support the ban on touch screens without voter verified paper ballots.

Attend the Shelly hearings in Sacramento.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. YES!!! Now we're getting somewhere!
I wish the candidates in Georgia would start some lawsuits. After the 2000 and 2002 elections, there's NO WAY Georgia has any clue. That's one state that's been bought and paid for.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope Bev saw this..
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC