Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why not pick VP and Cabinet NOW?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:11 AM
Original message
Why not pick VP and Cabinet NOW?
Hear me out.

Let's say your Attorney General pick is John Edwards. His job during the campaign becomes the hammering of John Ashcroft 24/7.

The same with all other cabinet picks. Let them tear up and expose the hacks currently holding those positions.

This way you (sorry for the borrowed phrase) take the target off of Kerry's back and the Bushies are forced to run a multi-lateral campaign...

I understand the drawbacks, but isn't there some value in getting a full team together to attack the Administration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why distract the public from the Bush admin imploding?
Right now the news is dominated by the implosion of Bush's Iraq policy, the debacle on 9/11 and the inept handling of terrorism. If Kerry started naming his administration staff this would steal just take away from the coverage. Best to wait until a week when things turn to the positive for bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fair enough...by NOW, I meant sooner than later...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's a pretty good idea! There are drawbacks, as you say
One is that some of the people who would make good cabinet members are in races of their own, and wouldn't want the distraction.

Two is that Kerry isn't sure exactly what his election strategy should be yet. Some of it will depend on how the 9-11 Commission turns out, etc. VP is a big part of strategy.

Three, you get a lot of attention when you choose, but that attention fades. if you do it too soon, it kills some of the excitement.

Four, it takes a lot of focus off Kerry, and puts in on the Republicans, who will start holding daily press conferences about some scandal they've found on the others.

Five, it would be expensive to have all of them campaigning with Kerry.

Six, Kerry has to develop his own platform, and with other cabinet members on his team, some of them may say things to contradict him from time to time, making Kerry look unfocused. On the other hand, Bush's cabinet does that now, and it doesn't seem to hurt him. But that's with the media acting as his PR Department.

The good points, though, are as you say. There are more Dems attacking Bush. The Republicans have to diffuse their energies to slander more people (that's the good side of point four). With that many lies floating around, there is more of a chance that people will see through the slanders.

Intriguing idea, phillybri. Very. Maybe at the convention would be a good time. Pick the VP before, pick a couple of cabinet members during the convention. Clark, Dean. Pick Richard Clarke as head of Homeland Security (that would cause Bush problems, and give Clarke a microphone).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC