Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bushitters can't claim confidence in PDB's "ongoing investigations"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:53 PM
Original message
Bushitters can't claim confidence in PDB's "ongoing investigations"
Now wait a freaking minute..!

I was listening to a replay of this morning's O'Franken Factor, when it was stated that the CIA produces the Presidential Daily Briefs (PDBs). Hearing this highlights a major conflict in the Bush admin's statements that they trusted that the investigations would be carried out appropriately and that they would be notified should any investigation produce actionable intelligence.

Here's what I'm having a problem with...

The CIA produces the Presidential Daily Briefs (PDBs), including the August 6th "Osama bin Laden Determined to Strike Within the US" PDB.

The August 6th PDB states, "The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full field investigations throughout the US that it considers Bin Ladin-related." The PDB comments on other FBI and joint-FBI/CIA initiatives, and the subject itself underscores a theat against the US mainland.

Condoleezza Rice, as quoted during 9/11 Commission questioning by Fred Fielding, stated in October 2000 during the Presidential campaign, "... you really have to get intelligence agencies better organized to deal with the terrorist threat to the United States itself. ... There needs to be better cooperation ..." Additionally, the Bush Administration was well-aware of the systemic issues as a result of the Hart-Rudman report.

How then, can Bush et al claim that they were confident that the FBI was properly working the investigations, given that the PDB information had come through the CIA? Wouldn't the basic presumption of poor cooperation between the CIA and FBI make the PDB information suspect, requiring detailed followup? And the PDB only approximates the investigations at 70; given the danger, shouldn't the exact number of investigations have been determined? As well as interrogating the FBI as to the exact nature of each of the investigations?

We're preaching to the choir here, I'm thinking, since any *rational* person would see that the Bush Admin effectively ignored the al Qaeda threat. Anybody not yet convinced of this is just too far gone or obtuse to likely ever be convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fir starters, the FBI is saying that they didn't have 70 investigations un
They don't know how that made it into the PDB. This is such a confusing mess and I'm sure it is meant to be.

On the one hand, this administration wants to make the case that they were so concerned about terrorists that they ordered up the PDB (light on the facts, please). OTOH, they say they had no actionable information.

I do know this. George didn't warn the American people and he took a month off after the 8/6 meeting. As far as I am concerned he was either totally incompetent or he let the attack happen. Either way, articles of impeachment should be underway in COngress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC