http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/04/14/bushs_plea_of_ignorance/Bush says he needed a time and a place of an imminent attack before acting against Al Qaeda.
This is the same Bush who spit at needing a time and place of an imminent attack before invading Iraq. In his January 2003 State of the Union address, Bush said: "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have the terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?"
Since when has an American president been so nakedly two-faced?--snip--
Bush clearly did not stretch himself on the Aug. 6 memo.
No evidence has yet been offered that he interrupted his summer vacation or called any meetings to consider its implications. The same Bush stretched Saddam's false threat to the point where seven out of 10 Americans believed Saddam played a role in 9/11.
Bush pleads ignorance on Al Qaeda. He pleads ignorance on Iraq's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. It will always be unclear whether a less ignorant Bush could have prevented 9/11. It is crystal clear that Bush's ignorant rush into Iraq has resulted in the deaths of thousands of people. Bush is gambling that ignorance over intelligence is bliss.
His use of ignorance is an insult to our intelligence.