Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashcroft Lying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:37 PM
Original message
Ashcroft Lying
Edited on Wed Apr-14-04 02:38 PM by G_j
THE DAILY MIS-LEAD
< http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1333383&l=28143 >
===============================

ASHCROFT'S RECORD OF LYING TO CONGRESS ABOUT 9/11

With Attorney General John Ashcroft testifying before the 9/11 Commission
today, a quick analysis of his previous statements shows he has repeatedly
lied to Congress about the Bush Administration's counterterrorism record.
Specifically, when questioned by Congress in 2002 about why he tried to
de-prioritize and slash funding for counterterrorism before 9/11, Ashcroft
resorted to dishonest denials -- even in the face of budget documents that
proved he was not telling the truth.

For instance, in testimony before the House of Representatives, Ashcroft
said that before 9/11, his "number-one goal" at the Justice Department "was
the prevention of terrorist acts" and that he immediately "began to shape
the department and its efforts in that respect" (1). But according to the
Washington Post, internal Administration documents from before 9/11 "show
that Ashcroft ranked counterterrorism efforts as a lower priority than his
predecessor did" (2). The documents "indicate that before Sept. 11, Ashcroft
did not give terrorism top billing in his strategic plans for the Justice
Department, which includes the FBI. A draft of Ashcroft's 'Strategic Plan'
from Aug. 9, 2001, does not put fighting terrorism as one of the
department's seven goals, ranking it as a sub-goal beneath gun violence and
drugs."

Ashcroft tried to blame his negligence of counterterrorism on the previous
Administration, telling Congress that "the five-year plan that had been put
in place by my predecessor didn't mention counterterrorism" (3). But
according to the New York Times, "the plan issued by Attorney General Janet
Reno in 2000 said the Justice Department would have to devote more attention
and resources to terrorism, citing sophisticated computer and bomb-making
technology and the 'emerging threats of chemical, biological, radiological
and nuclear weapons'" (4).

Ashcroft has even been dishonest about events after 9/11, telling Congress
that when the Administration was writing the emergency counterterrorism
funding bill after the attacks, the FBI "came to me with a $670 million
request, and we counseled them to take that to $1.1 billion" (5). But
according to the Washington Post, "In the early days after the Sept. 11,
2001, attacks, the Bush White House cut by nearly two-thirds an emergency
request for counterterrorism funds by the FBI... The document, dated Oct.
12, 2001, shows that the FBI requested $1.5 billion in additional funds to
enhance its counterterrorism efforts with the creation of 2,024 positions.
But the White House Office of Management and Budget cut that request to $531
million" (6). Ashcroft "cut the FBI's request for items such as computer
networking and foreign language intercepts by half, cut a cyber-security
request by three quarters and eliminated entirely a request for
'collaborative capabilities.'"

Sources:
1. Attorney General John Ashcroft testimony, 02/28/2002.
2. "FBI Budget Squeezed After 9/11", Washington Post, 02/22/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1333383&l=28144.
3. Attorney General John Ashcroft testimony, 02/28/2002.
4. New York Times, 03/01/2002.
5. Attorney General John Ashcroft testimony, 02/28/2002.
6. "FBI Budget Squeezed After 9/11", Washington Post, 02/22/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1333383&l=28144.

Visit Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration distortion. -->
< http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1333383&l=28145 >

===========================================================

Subscribe to the Daily Mislead! Go to http://www.misleader.org and enter
your e-mail address in the "Receive the Daily Mislead" box in the
top-left corner of the page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm... I thought born again Christians
don't lie...

Either he's a liar, or he's not a born-again Christian. He should be called out on his psuedo-faith he's hiding behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and mind you, this was not an isolated case
he "repeatedly" lied!

I don't know how he reconciles it with his religion, but the man is not playing with a full deck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "not playing with a full deck" LOL. . .
Anyone who pours Crisco oil on his head and calls it "anointing" has gotta be one taco short of a combo plate !!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. fucking nuts
and this guy is America's chief law enforcement officer.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I have found the "born agains"
with whom I have had business dealings to be far more likely to be dishonest and unethical.

I avoid businesses with the dead fish decal in the window whenever possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's not a very good liar, it showed while he was testifying
Condi is a much cooler/smoother liar.

Did anyone watch Asscroft's testimony on CNN-I had to laugh, they actually had the sidebar thing running with facts that countered his testimony-mostly about staffing numbers and such.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, he came across like an arrogant POS on television.
n/t

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baronessniki Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, who is going to expose this in 'prime time?"
I'm taking bets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also Lied About the Vacation via Private Jet (cost us $1800 PER HOUR!)
Edited on Wed Apr-14-04 06:04 PM by AndyTiedye
If Ashcroft goes to prison, it will be because of this one, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC