Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Graham was right on impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:31 PM
Original message
Bob Graham was right on impeachment
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/04/11/Columns/Bob_Graham_was_right.shtml

TALLAHASSEE - Sen. Bob Graham was left on a lonely limb last summer when he said, in response to a reporter's prompt, that George Bush's misadventure in Iraq met the standard of an impeachable offense. Even some Democrats hastened to disagree. As it turns out, Graham was right. It's his timing that was off.

As Graham acknowledged, however, impeachment is not a realistic prospect in a Congress controlled by intense loyalists of the president's party. Even so, historians may wonder why one president was impeached for lying about sex but his successor was not even investigated for a scandal as immense as Iraq.

The nation has never been led so badly, except, perhaps, by James Buchanan, who at the brink of civil war did not lead at all.

It is not simply that lives are being wasted because of pretexts that have turned out to be untrue, or that the situation is worsening with no relief in sight. There is also the spectacle, as Bob Kerrey framed it in a question to Condoleezza Rice the other day, of "a largely Christian army in a Muslim nation." This is a colossal disaster, as history could have warned anyone who had cared to pay attention. The Crusades may be only a passing chapter in Western history, but the Middle East remembers them as a fountain of evils that persist to this day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I supported Bob Graham for President last year during this illegal war!
Before Wes Clark, I was STRONGLY supported Graham. He opposed this illegal war and has a CLEAR alternative on National Security.

Graham was right then and he is right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. People should consider that Grahams voting legislation will get the most
coverage and biggest prospect for progression in congress if he gets chosen for vp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Graham opposed the war because it did not go far enough
He wanted to invade Syria as well.

That's why I could not support him for Prez. He did do a very good job of attacking Bush, but Graham is an Israeli hawk at heart and that I can't agree with him on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You care to share a link with us
About wanting to invade Syria?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LDS Jock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. He was right
and yet still there is no movement to take any action. With a rebup Congress it might not happen but is anyone even trying? Which is worse, screwing an intern or screwing the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC