Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You have to admit, Bush did lower income taxes for the poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:47 PM
Original message
You have to admit, Bush did lower income taxes for the poor
You lose your job, you don't have any income.

No income, no income tax.

On that, he can admit that, yes, he did lower income taxes for millions of non-millionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually, that isn't true
Unemployment and Social Security benefits can be taxed, thank you Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BostonTeaParty04 Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Believe me... a lot of people don't get UI or SS benefits...
Plenty!!!

(Clinton made those taxable??? Lord, the primary things that Clinton did that were contrary to the dem platform were real doozies.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ahem, could someone remove this piece of filth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Actually that's t least partially
bullshit. Unemployment benefits became taxable under the Tax Reform Act of 1986. That would be RayGun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivejazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The "thank you Bill Clinton" part is indeed
bullshit. Both were taxed before Clinton was in the White House. Clinton did increase the percentage of Social Security benefits that upper-income recipients had to pay taxes on, that's all. To make your argument you must be assuming that all Social Security recipients are upper-income. That may be the case in your circle of friends, but not mine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for the back-up
but apparently this is a hit and run poster. Probably off looking for something else to accuse Clinton of, and so, is too busy to try to support his obvious lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL . . . as soon as I saw your title. . .
I was thinking exactly the same thing before I even clicked :)

If you ain't earnin' income, you ain't got income tax :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly, it's too true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paranoid_Portlander Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the illogic that my aunt uses.
Her income has been severely reduced, thanks to Greenspan's (R) interest rates. So her taxes are reduced. She thinks Bush is wonderful because she received a refund on the overpayment of her taxes, the Bush tax cut, she calls it. I wonder how many other elderly people are similarly confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Careful, it will show iup in an ad next week.
Get thee to a copyright office for that thought.

The vast vastness are too ignorant to see the tricky logic in that statement, so it would make a perfect, if very false, ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. you're right...no job, no income = no taxes
Edited on Thu Apr-15-04 06:15 PM by noiretblu
i did a few returns for folks here at work, and i saw the results of *'s tax changes.
most notably, a lot of early withdrawals from retirment plans = 10% penalty + tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC