|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
karlschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 05:31 PM Original message |
Pat Buchanan wants to know WHO FORGED the Uranium docs!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, who da guy?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBlob (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think the better question would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Bill Press had a good point that doesn't get enough attention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAB (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. You know Bucannan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That is far from inconceivable. They sure have the expertise & resources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. This is the most closely vetted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackstraw45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. SOTU intel discredited by Powell, Rice and others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It don matter; the shrub KNEW it was false and went ahead. It made the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. If the Mossad had been the forgers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. good call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Good point. Not the Mossad- US + office of Ariel Sharon (Article) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 03:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. You're right, I was forgetting how sloppy a job it was. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. The White House's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Very curious, the things that * doesn't want to have investigated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Bill Clinton must have told Bush the wrong shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HERVEPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. I did <nt> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. I can't believe I'm agreeing with Buchanan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Augspies (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. No...He's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huckleberry (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-03 03:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I agree - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC