|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:15 AM Original message |
What if Iraq had WMD? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. We would still have to ask if they were a threat to us ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yep. Clear and present danger or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the Kelly Gang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
3. in all reality..so what if they did?..it was a soveriegn nation ,Saddam or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. If they had the WMD, would there not be incredibly more carnage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the Kelly Gang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:40 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. no..if he actually had them I doubt the US would have attacked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. It would had been treated much like the Americans liberating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snellius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
5. No WMDs: one of the great historical jokes of all time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catfight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
7. There was still no present danger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
8. his leadership is bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'll repeat my brilliant answers from yesterday...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OpSomBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
11. Good question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. So, we would still be in a quagmire, AND we would have had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OpSomBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Ok Sorry for my testy response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
14. If Saddam had had WMDs, don't you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Postman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Amen brother...I mean sister. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hotelmotel (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gothmog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
16. CATO Institute did some great work on why not to invade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-04 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
17. speaking of Iraq..saddam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC