Three examples of their standard reactions. Then something a little more strange...
#1 - She's making it up.
"Now she is a 'victim' the same as Hillarity.
Gotta love it.
1 posted on 04/17/2004 6:04:34 PM PDT by Glenn"
#2 - It's the Clintons' faults
"If this woman received any death threats, trust me it was probably from the DNC (Clintons) to keep her mouth shut.
17 posted on 04/17/2004 6:12:25 PM PDT by Two-Bits"
#3 - It's us here at DU.
"Assuming she has received threats, how do we know they didn't come from DUmmies pretending to be FReepers?
You know, as Rush might call them, seminar death threats.
13 posted on 04/17/2004 6:11:07 PM PDT by Texas Eagle"
But then there' something more ominious. One freeper is condemning the threats, and they are piling on her/him. Here's a post from the rational freeper and a response to that post.
"I agree she could be lying, but I have also seen some people go way too far in their reactions.
We need to fight the battle with all our might, but I just do not want to see us put unneeded obstacles in our path.
Again, you may be right that she received no death threats and, if so, I apologize.
58 posted on 04/17/2004 6:31:34 PM PDT by arjay"
"To: arjay
Physical threats against the enemies of our country will not lead to our survival.
Action will. Don't like that idea? Well I hope you like kneeling to mecca a few times a day for pigs like her.
It took action to become the United States of America - it took action in all of our subsequent wars - and it will take ACTION now to survive.
66 posted on 04/17/2004 6:36:35 PM PDT by steplock"
What does this freeper mean? He's talking about "ACTION" against "pigs like her" - that is fucking scary.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1119641/posts?q=1&&page=51