Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Medford - Why Can't W be a Man ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 01:11 PM
Original message
Mark Medford - Why Can't W be a Man ?
Why Won't Dubya Apologize - Botched 9-11 info, two botched wars,
a gutted economy, global scorn. Why Can't W be a man ?

There comes a time. There comes a time in every raw dumb imperfect beleaguered human's life when s/he has to face the music and pay the piper and fess up to his or her crimes and misdemeanors and blatant careening flubs and heartless gaffes and whoa where the hell was my brain that time sorry sorry sorry.

We all do it. We all smack our palms to our foreheads and trip on our own ideological shoelaces, and we are exasperating and thoughtlessly cruel without knowing it, running roughshod over our noble or ignoble intentions on a daily basis because, well, we are just wired this way. Just ask Mel "Spurtin' Blood" Gibson -- I mean, how much more wrong can you get?

But then comes the hard part: We apologize. Profusely and maybe even a bit meekly, we ask for forgiveness or at least offer an olive branch and recognize our shared messy humanness as the thing that differentiates us from the saccharine sexless drone people of the world -- like, you know, Laura Bush. Shudder.

But then there's Dubya. He is, apparently, immune. He is perfect and flawless and without the slightest taint of guilt or error, and, despite looking like a bowl of Jell-O salad in a universe of divine tiramisu, he is, apparently, an angel of purity and light. It's true.
(snip)

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2004/04/21/notes042104.DTL&nl=fix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. "an inability to acknowledge, and thus to articulate, personal error"
An inability to publicly admit error, combined with a readiness to blame others. Remember Bush’s mangled aphorism: “fool me once, shame on you – fool me, you can’t get fooled again.” The correct completion, of course, is “fool me twice, shame on me.” Mark Crispin Miller suggests that this flub reveals a deep moral defect in George Bush: an inability to acknowledge, and thus to articulate, personal error. Instead, blame is attached to any available individual – such as Richard Clarke, Paul O’Neill, and perpetually, Bill and Hillary Clinton. “The buck” flows unimpeded through and past the Oval Office. Buck-passing is not an endearing quality among the general public, which appreciates heart-felt apologies. Witness the public response to Richard Clarke’s apology before the 9/11 Commission.

http://www.crisispapers.org/essays/weak-bush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Puts him right up there with Jesus as the only two ever on the face of the
earth never to have sinned/erred. Houston, America, is it possible we have a problem here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC