|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-04 05:47 PM Original message |
Ultimate Kerry Defense D-Bunk |
Thanks PeteNYC!!!!!!!
BTW-RHANTSON TELL THE BUSH/CHENEY FOLKS TO STOP USING OUR FORMAT As Defense Chief Under George H.W. Bush Sr., Dick Cheney Cut Programs That Republicans Now Say Were “Critical To Recent Military Successes” BUSH/CHENEY LIES: Kerry Would Cut F-16s FACT Cheney: Proposed Cuts to F-16 Aircraft. In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Cheney said, “If you're going to have a smaller air force, you don't need as many F-16s…The F-16D we basically continue to buy and close it out because we're not going to have as big a force structure and we won't need as many F-16s.” According to the Boston Globe, Bush’s 1991 defense budget “kill FACT: Cheney Also Cut F-14 Tomcats. In 1991, Cheney was successful in scrapping plans for new F-14 Tomcat fighters. In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Cheney said, “What I recommended to the Committee was that we shut down the new F-14D production line, which will save almost $2-1/2 billion…” BUSH/CHENEY LIES: Kerry Would Cut B-2s FACT: Cheney Proposed Cuts to B-2 Program. According to the Boston Globe, in 1990, “Defense Secretary Richard Cheney announced a cutback… of nearly 45 percent in the administration's B-2 Stealth bomber program, from 132 airplanes to 75…” BUSH/CHENEY LIES: Kerry Would Cut AH-64 Apaches FACT: CHENEY Proposed Cuts to AH-64 Apaches. In testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Defense Subcommittee, Cheney said, “This is just a list of some of the programs that I've recommended termination: the V-22 Osprey, the F-14D, the Army Helicopter Improvement Program, Phoenix missile, F-15E, the Apache helicopter, the M1 tank, et cetera.” In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Cheney said, “The Army, as I indicated in my earlier testimony, recommended to me that we keep a robust Apache helicopter program going forward, AH-64…I forced the Army to make choices…So I recommended that we cancel the AH-64 program two years out.” BUSH/CHENEY LIES: Kerry Would Cut M-1 Abrams Tanks FACT: CHENEY Proposed Cuts to M-1 Abrams Tanks. In testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Defense Subcommittee, Cheney said, “This is just a list of some of the programs that I've recommended termination: the V-22 Osprey, the F-14D, the Army Helicopter Improvement Program, Phoenix missile, F-15E, the Apache helicopter, the M1 tank, et cetera.” The Boston Globe reported on the impact of Cheney’s cuts to armored tanks: “The Army's cupboard is left particularly bare. Coming in the wake of last year's killing of the M-1 tank and the Apache helicopter, the death of the M-2 means the Army will soon have virtually no major weapons in production.” Posted in National Security | Entry link By Peter Daou on March 18, 2004 at 04:11 PM Bush Misrepresents Kerry's Position on Intelligence Funding http://blog.johnkerry.com/dbunker/archives/001369.html BUSH/CHENEY LIES: In 1995, John Kerry proposed "deeply irresponsible" cuts in intelligence spending that "gutted" intelligence funding. FACT: The so-called "deeply irresponsible cuts" mentioned by Bush "represented about the same amount Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), then chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told the Senate that same day he wanted cut from the intelligence spending bill based on an unspent, secret fund that had been accumulated by one intelligence agency "without informing the Pentagon, CIA or Congress," according to The Washington Post. The truth is, the cuts passed by voice vote with no opposition, including such radical "left-wingers" as Republicans Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond, Trent Lott, Mitch McConnell, Rick Santorum and Don Nickles. The so-called "cuts" then became law, without a single Republican complaining about the measure for the nine years prior to the 2004 Presidential campaign. Fred Kaplan, writing for Slate, makes this point: "Kerry's proposal would not have cut a single intelligence program." What the Republicans don't want you to know is that John Kerry has supported $200 billion in intelligence funding over the past seven years - a 50 percent increase since 1996. On March 9th, in a Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing, George Tenet said that the one percent reduction would not gut the intelligence capabilities: DAYTON: I'd just like clarify one point that was made earlier by Senator Cornyn. You have a budget that's obviously classified, but the reference to the contemplated or conceptualized $1.5 billion, I think as then Senator Cornyn acknowledged, was a $300 million reduction in the budget or the proposed budget or the increases in the budget for each of five years. But 1 percent, if that's the approximate number, based on published reports, reduction in your budget overall for each of the five years, would that, quote,/unquote "gut your agency and your intelligence-gathering capabilities"? As far as I know, that wasn't specified, but would a 1 percent -- hypothetically, would a 1 percent, say, reduction in your budget for each of five years, quote/unquote, "gut your agency and its intelligence-gathering capabilities"? TENET: Let me say that in the mid-'90s, it wouldn't have been helpful. DAYTON: Would it have "gut" in that -- would it have "gut" in that vernacular? TENET: Sir, obviously no $300 million cut is going to "gut" your intelligence capabilities. DAYTON: Thank you. _________________ Kerry votes supporting intelligence funding: FY03 Intel Authorization $39.3-$41.3 Billion* <2002, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 9/25/02> FY02 Intel Authorization $33 Billion* <2001, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 12/13/01> FY01 Intel Authorization $29.5-$31.5 Billion* <2000, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 12/6/00> FY00 Intel Authorization $29-$30 Billion* <1999, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 11/19/1999> FY99 Intel Authorization $29.0 Billion* <1998, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 10/8/98> FY98 Intel Authorization $26.7 Billion* <1997, Senate Roll Call Vote #109> FY97 Intel Authorization $26.6 Billion* <1996, Unanimous Senate Voice Vote 9/25/96> * Posted in National Security | Entry link By Peter Daou on March 16, 2004 at 11:02 AM Bush/Cheney 04 Launches New, Misleading Attack Ad On Kerry's Defense Record THE FACTS: THE FACTS ABOUT CHENEY’S CUTS TO KEY MILITARY PROGRAMS Cheney Proposed Cutting Weapons Programs That Were Important to Success in Iraq. In 1990, Cheney proposed cutting 90 C-17 Air Force cargo transport planes and 14 B-52 bombers. Cheney also sought the retirement of two Navy battleships, two nuclear cruisers, and eight nuclear-powered attack submarines. In 1991, Cheney scrapped the Navy’s A-12 Stealth attack plane, a fighter that was proclaimed to be a key part of the future of navy aviation in advanced stealth technology. C-17s and B-52s Vital to Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to Defense Daily, “From January through mid-April C-17s in the Central Command's Middle East theater of operations conducted 2,600 missions, carrying more than 23,000 personnel, and more than 73 million pounds of cargo.” An analysis by Anthony Cordesman at the Center for Strategic and International Studies showed that the Air Force B-1, B-2, and B-52 bombers dropped nearly two-thirds of the total bombs in the war. Cheney Cut Thousands of Active-Duty, Reserve, and Civilian Forces. In January 1990, Cheney banned the hiring of any new civilian personnel in the Defense Department through the end of September, which left more than 65,000 jobs vacant. Under the budget proposed in 1990, the Pentagon would have reduced active military personnel by 38,000; selected reserves would have fallen by 3,000. The budget called for the deactivation of two Army divisions. Long range, the Pentagon planned to reduce its work force by 300,000, including about 200,000 military personnel and 100,000 civilians. In 1991, he called for reduction of 200,000 active and reserve military personnel over two years. In 1992, Cheney called for cutting 500,000 active-duty people, 200,000 reservists, and 200,000 civilians over five years. Reserves Being Used at “Unprecedented Rate” in Iraq. National guardsmen and reservists will soon make up 40 percent of the total U.S. force in Iraq. Reservists are being used at “unprecedented rate,” according to Lt. Gen. Steven Blum, chief of the Army National Guard. Tasked with homeland security missions and combat rotations in Iraq and Afghanistan, many of the part-time soldiers mobilized in the first days after September 11 have yet to be deactivated. An internal Army National Guard survey of 5,000 soldiers in 15 states recently presented a disturbing forecast: The rate at which Army Guard members leave the force after extended deployments could nearly double to 22 percent. THE TRUTH ABOUT KERRY AND CHENEY RECORDS Kerry is a Strong Supporter of America’s Military; Has Supported More Than $4.4 Trillion in Defense Spending & Voted for “Largest Increase in Defense Spending Since the Early 1980’s. He has support 16 of the 19 defense authorization bills since elected to the Senate. John Kerry is a strong supporter of the U.S. Armed Services and has consistently worked to ensure the military has the best equipment and training possible. In 2002, John Kerry voted for a large increase in the defense budget. This increase provided more than $355 billion for the Defense Department for 2003, an increase of $21 billion over 2002. This measure includes $71.5 billion for procurement programs such as $4 billion for the Air Force's F-22 fighter jets, $3.5 billion for the Joint Strike Fighter and $279.3 million for an E-8C Joint Stars (JSTARS) aircraft. Kerry’s vote also funded a 4.1% pay increase for military personnel, $160 million for the B-1 Bomber Defense System Upgrade, $1.5 billion for a new attack submarine, more than $630 million for Army and Navy variants of the Blackhawk helicopter, $3.2 billion for additional C-17 transports, $900 million for R&D of the Comanche helicopter and more than $800 million for Trident Submarine conversion. The current chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, John Warner (R-VA) stated: “The defense spending increase for FY03 is the largest increase in defense spending since the early 1980's-reflecting the importance of defending the homeland and winning the global war against terrorism” <2002, Senate Roll Call Vote # 239; Websites of U.S. Senators Warner, Daschle, Dodd accessed 7/25/03> APACHE HELICOPTER: The Kerry Record Kerry has supported $13 billion in defense authorizations for the Apache THE CHENEY RECORD: Terminate The Apache; According to the RNC, AH-64 Apache Helicopters Were Crucial to Operation Iraqi Freedom.In testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Defense Subcommittee, Cheney said, “This is just a list of some of the programs that I've recommended termination: the V-22 Osprey, the F-14D, the Army Helicopter Improvement Program, Phoenix missile, F-15E, the Apache helicopter, the M1 tank, et cetera.” In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Cheney said, “The Army, as I indicated in my earlier testimony, recommended to me that we keep a robust Apache helicopter program going forward, AH-64…I forced the Army to make choices…So I recommended that we cancel the AH-64 program two years out.” AEGIS SHIPS: The Kerry Record Kerry has supported at least $53 billion defense authorizations for the Aegis program THE CHENEY RECORD: Cheney Cut Program, Costing Jobs. Cheney plan cut 9 of original 25 ships planned, putting shipyard in jeopardy BRADLEY FIGHTING VEHICLES: The Kerry Record Kerry has supported at least $8.5 billion in defense authorizations for the Bradley program THE CHENEY RECORD: Bush-Cheney Budget Terminated The Bradley. “Major weapons killed include the Army's M-2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Navy's Trident submarine and F-14 aircraft, and the Air Force's F-16 airplane. Cheney decided the military already has enough of these weapons.” BLACKHAWK HELICOPTERS: The Kerry Record Kerry has supported at least $13 billion in defense authorizations on versions of the Blackhawk. THE CHENEY RECORD: Terminate The Black Hawk. The Pentagon’s internal budget deliberations recommended termination of the Black Hawk program under Secretary Cheney.” B-2 BOMBER: The Kerry Record Kerry has supported over $16.7 billion in defense authorizations for the B-2 program THE CHENEY RECORD: Cheney Proposed Cuts to B-2 Program, According to the RNC, B-2s Were Crucial to Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to the Boston Globe, in 1990, “Defense Secretary Richard Cheney announced a cutback… of nearly 45 percent in the administration's B-2 Stealth bomber program, from 132 airplanes to 75…” C-17 CARGO JETS: The Kerry Record Kerry supported at least $34.5 billion in defense authorizations for the C-17 THE CHENEY RECORD: Cutting C-17 Program. In 1990, Cheney proposed cutting 90 C-17 Air Force cargo transport planes F/A-18 FIGHTER JETS : The Kerry Record Kerry supported at least $60 billion in defense authorizations for the F/A-18 and F-18 THE CHENEY RECORD: Cutbacks Hit Industry Hard: Workers and the industry were hit hard by Cheney’s decision for “major cuts” in the F/A-18 program and upgrades to the F-18 in the late 1980s F-16 FIGHTER JETS: The Kerry Record Kerry supported at least $25 billion in defense authorizations for the F-16. THE CHENEY RECORD: Cheney Proposed Cutting F-16 Aircraft, According to the RNC, F-16s Were Crucial to Operation Iraqi Freedom. In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Cheney said, “If you're going to have a smaller air force, you don't need as many F-16s…The F-16D we basically continue to buy and close it out because we're not going to have as big a force structure and we won't need as many F-16s.” According to the Boston Globe, Bush’s 1991 defense budget “kill TOMAHAWK MISSILES: The Kerry Record Kerry supported at least $6 billion in defense authorizations for the Tomahawk missile program. THE CHENEY RECORD: No New Missiles Requested Even As Stocks Depleted Before Gulf War, Cutbacks Lead To Layoffs: Cheney’s defense budget was so pared-down that it didn’t include any funds for more Tomahawk missiles in 1991, despite stocks rapidly diminished by the military action in the Persian Gulf. Cuts in 1990 led to layoffs throughout the nation. C-130 CARGO JETS: The Kerry Record Kerry supported at least $12 billion in defense authorizations for the C-130 THE CHENEY RECORD: Move Hurricane Plane Out of Dept. of Defense, Move Considered Dangerous. In 1990, Cheney pushed a potentially dangerous move by trying to shift the WC-130 Hurricane Hunter planes from the Department of Defense and into the Department of Commerce. The WC-130 is used to track Hurricanes and warn coastal residents in time to evacuate the area. In July 1990, Cheney ordered that the Air Force halt all WC-130 flights by October 1, 1990 and turn the mission to the Commerce Department. Reed Boatright, a spokesman for the Commerce Department said, “we are not in a position to accept planes either financially or infrastructure wise.” According to Jerry Jarrell, deputy director of the National Hurricane Center, “It would be devastating” if the Commerce Department was unable to pick up the WC-130 after Cheney released it from Defense. Today, the WC-130 remains at Defense. PATRIOT MISSILE SYSTEM: The Kerry Record Kerry supported at least $10 billion in defense authorizations for the Patriot program. SOURCES ON KERRY SPENDING: Congressional Quarterly Almanacs, 1986-2002; House Armed Service Committee Authorization Conference Report Summaries; Conference Reports for Defense Authorizations, FY1986 – present Posted in Election 2004 | Entry link By Peter Daou on April 26, 2004 at 10:47 AM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-04 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. But, but, he needs to spell out ... |
which bands he wants for his inaugural party! :D
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC