Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What exactly was Barry Goldwater's platform?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:50 PM
Original message
What exactly was Barry Goldwater's platform?
I hear about how he changed the Republican party from the center to center-right party it was at the time to far right, but he doesn't really seem like a far right guy at all. Apparentely he wanted to kick all the liberals and centrists out of the party, but he seems like a centrist. He opposed criminalizing abortion. He was generally supportive of gay rights and some gun control. While he did oppose the Civil Rights Act, even most black leaders admit his reasons had nothing to do with racism and he actually had a good recod on civil rights while on the Phoenix city council. And he strongly disliked the Robertson/Falwell crew, who it seems are more responsible, along with Reagan, for today's modern Republican party than Goldwater. If the modern day Republican party was the party of Goldwater we wouldn't have anywhere near as many problems as we do now. So why was he known as being so far right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. old-time
small-government conservative tied to intense anti-communism.

Sad that by today's standards, he's rather moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. In your heart you know he's right!
That was Goldwater's slogan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was drop the a-bomb on North Vietnam...
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Au-H2O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here is his acceptance speech
Edited on Mon May-03-04 04:02 PM by theboss
http://www.nationalcenter.org/Goldwater.html

"During four, futile years the administration which we shall replace has distorted and lost that faith. it has talked and talked and talked and talked the words of freedom, but it has failed and failed and failed in the works of freedom.

Now failure cements the wall of shame in Berlin; failures blot the sands of shame at the Bay of Pigs; failures marked the slow", death of freedom in Laos; failures infest the jungles of Vietnam; and failures haunt the houses of our once great alliances and undermine the greatest bulwark ever erected by free nations, the NATO community.

Failures proclaim lost leadership, obscure purpose, weakening wills, and the risk of inciting our sworn enemies to new aggressions and to new excesses.

And because of this administration we are tonight a world divided. We are a nation becalmed. We have lost the brisk pace of diversity and the genius of individual creativity. We are plodding at a pace set by centralized planning, red tape, rules without responsibility, and regimentation without recourse.

Rather than useful jobs in our country, people have been offered bureaucratic make-work; rather than moral leadership, they have been given bread and circuses; they have been given spectacles, and, yes, they've even been given scandals."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Chad Mitchell Trio summed it up in a song
Edited on Mon May-03-04 04:02 PM by havocmom
and the chorus was:
So let's go back to the days when men were men
and start the first World War all over again!

That's right, you tell 'em son.
Isolationism can be fun!...


edit: typo


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liarliartieonfire Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hillary Clinton worked for Goldwater
She was a Republican at the time, I believe her father was a Goldwater Republian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep, Hillary was a 'Goldwater Girl'
Edited on Mon May-03-04 04:26 PM by havocmom
I will admit the man had some really moral beliefs but he was not interested in an activist state. Later in life, I believe he recanted some of the harsher views he held dear in the early 60s. Like many, perhaps he started noticing shades of gray as he got older. And he was concerned for the environment.

I believe he was also critical of the 'Newt' wing of the GOP which was gaining power as AuH20 was taking his leave of this life.

edited to add: He was firmly in favor of fiscal responsibility, unlike the neocons who are all for cutting their own taxes AND spending money (at businesses owned by their pals) like drunken sailors. {Apologies to any drunken spendthrift sailors out there. Most sailors I ever saw had to be pretty careful with a buck}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. I seem to recalll...
That Goldwater once said that every good Christiaon shoud kick Falwell right in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Society was Much More Liberal Then
most of today's Democrats would be considered right-wing if viewed by 1964 standards.

Some of had to do with Goldwater's old-line Reader's-Digest-type conservative rhetoric. A lot of it had to do with the hot-button issues of the day: civil rights and anti-communism. In practice, being anti-communist meant an effective declaration of war against any nominally communist government. Although had he been elected, Goldwater might not have been any worse in Vietnam than Johnson.

I agree with your point -- by today's standards, Goldwater does not look nearly as extreme as he was painted in the campaign. LBJ did quite an effective political attack. And the media was not on Goldwater's side, either.

BTW, I remember my father working on the Goldwater campaign -- being a chemist, he appreciated the AuH2O bumper stickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC