Article in The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/comment/story/0,14259,1209134,00.htmlThis article was penned by a former senior Democratic party strategist. I was wondering whether this article was actually written for The Guardian. Usually, if the article is a reprint of one that appeared previously in another paper, The Guardian says so, and in this case it does not say so.
If so, Democrats are clearly capable of getting to the heart of the matter when writing for the foreign press. But they should be doing so for the US press!
Of course, the key phrase may be "former". People with no careers to jeapordise are always free to speak the truth as they see it.