Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would Gore have done to prevent 9/11?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:48 AM
Original message
What would Gore have done to prevent 9/11?
Would he have met with the Taliban in Houston, right after the election? Would he have be so terribly conflicted with PNAC, Halliburton and Carlyle? Would he have idiots like Rummy, Rice, and Wolfie on the staff? Would he have ignored the mountains of warnings? Sorry, Al Franken, but how can you not believe in LIHOP?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Daily meetings to shake the trees
just like Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Now I'm confused
Edited on Tue May-04-04 08:56 AM by bryant69
Part of LIHOP was that President Bush hired idiots like Rummy Rice and Wolfie because he knew they wouldn't figure it out?

That's really an intricate plan. I think it's simpler to just believe that President Bush is an idiot and so hired idiots.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Wolfie came in with PNAC.
Bush is an idiot and a hand-puppet. But, that does not mean there an intricate plan was absent. Baker, Cheney, Rove, etc... they all knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ah.
So you have the idiot cabal with President Bush, Rummy, Wolfie, and Rice. Powell who might suspect but didn't do anything.

And then you have the evil cabal with Baker, Cheney, and Rove who know that an attack is coming, but choose to do nothing about it.

Is that the theory?

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Do you think that Baker, Bush Sr., and Cheney are really that stupid
For one thing, they're oilmen and ex-CIA. Yeah, I think they knew what was coming. Sorry if it is hard for some of you to swallow. I don't like it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. AH.
Well here's some solid proof. We all know about the precognative powers of oilmen. I had forgotten that they were Oilmen or I would have bought your argument immediately. Oilmen always know about attacks being made on America in advance.

It's hard for me to swallow because it's crap. And more to the point, there's a lack of proof.

But I will say this, if I believed LIHOP or MIHOP I wouldn't be pissing away my time on this message board. If those scenarios are accurate it means that there is no America, and no legitimate American government. The only response is revolution. Not pansy ass walking around holding signs, but taking up arms to tear down those who have usurped power.

Bryant
check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. So, I guess that means that since
Bryant is not engaging in open revolution, then Bush/Cheney did not really idly sit by during 9/11. They were just merely stupid. Now, if Bryant were to take up arms, then we would know for sure that Bush/Cheney LIHOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Yep--you're right
I feel comfortable saying that since I don't believe in LIHOP that it didn't happen.

Although, I have to say, I'd be surprised if the rest of you accepted that as proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. who the f*** ever said that?
Bush is a f***ing puppet; he has no clue what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Maybe part of your plan
To spread bullshit strawman theories on the board to discredit real research?

I have never heard anyone say anything like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. He would of taken action on the briefings from the CIA and FBI
He would of listened to Dick Clarke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. He damn sure wouldn't have lied to us about the reasons to invade Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Gore always tried for the truth, a hard mission when he
you are surrounded by frauds and fascists. Most of the time I think the country has gone Fascist and we are now starting to see the manifestations of their work over the last 30 years.
The outrage of the prison incident from our government has been diffusion not outrage. And for some pundits on television to say it was a frat-prank; it is so horrible. To reduce torture and say such a vapid remark on the suffering of others.
Gore would never have gone to war with Iraq. You're right oldtimer1942.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think he would have made sure that airline security was,,,
strengthened. I don't think he would have considered threats of terrorists using airplanes as nothing to be concerned about like the bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Same thing Clinton did to prevent 31 Dec 99 attacks.
Remember them? Terrorist blowing up the Space Needle in Seattle, that fancy resteraunt in Los Angeles Airport, and the Lincoln Tunnel in New York City?

They failed because when members of the Clinton admin. discovered part of the plot (thanks to our Canadian allies), they made a maximum effort to break up the rest of it.

So, when the Gore Admin. was told 'Al Queda plans to attack inside the U.S.' in early August, they'd do the same... They may not have succeeded, but they could at least point to the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ironpost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. First off
I think when cowboy first hit the Whitehorse and cast his finger in the air, and I'm not talking about checking the direction here, to the Arab world he set the tone. I believe that Gore would have kept doing pretty much what he was comfortable with, at least he would have maintained some sense of chivalry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. One thing he would have done whether directly relevant
Edited on Tue May-04-04 09:15 AM by tinanator
we would have attended the UN conference on Racism. And there would not have been a stand down, which of course is proof of LIHOP/MIHOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. well, just for starters...
he would NOT have shelved the current intelligence as bushco did

he would NOT have allowed his AG to put terrorism on the backburner while he went after prostitues, porn and pot

he would NOT have ignored the warnings (internal and foreign)

we would NOT have been on extended vacation when threats were raised

I could go on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Pleast do go on nostamj,
I like the way you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Simple. He Would have paid attention. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Something...verses...nothing...
gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. Strawman Game...It Happened On *'s Watch!
The what would and what if game is one the wingnuts like to play and drive it into the ground. If Clenis had taken up the Sudanese (even though we know that's not what happened), If Goerlick hadn't created "The Wall" (again another lie and distortion). We can play this game all over the place if you like. That's a LIHOP'ers greatest fun.

Sorry, I don't play this one. Facts are, this attack occured on this regime's watch and we're seeing that there were all kinds of warnings that were ignored and previous plans that were scuttled. That's where the focus belongs.

On 9/11 Gore was out of the country...so was Clinton...and both got to Ground Zero faster than Commander Bunnypants did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. taken office and not conspired with the "terrorists"
that would have been enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BGrier Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. How About A Simple Call To The FAA?
Bush was told there was activity consistent with hijackings and didn't even follow up to make sure the FAA was notified. It's criminal negligence in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Nothing at all most likely
Edited on Tue May-04-04 07:07 PM by Ardee
as the plans were in the works for quite some time and would have gone forward regardless of the election results. Perhaps there was an outside chance that listening to and acting upon intelligence might have prevented the hijackers partially or even completely but I seriously doubt it.

The real difference is what Gore woud have done in response to the attacks.
1. involve the UN from the outset
2. had a concrete plan for Afghanistan after defeating the Taliban
3. never have invaded Iraq
4. never have alienated the entire arab world
5. never have acted like a complete asshole, braying and sputtering about a crusade, lying and contradicting himself endlessly

Pity that Gore was not IN the WH at the time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Would he have received warnings & planned a month-long vacation?
Yes, all your suggestions as to what he would have done afterwards sound reasonable.

But, even those facts that have been revealed by the none-too-rigorous investigation indicate that serious warnings were being sent. Bush's people did nothing but protect their own asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. yes Bush did indeed ignore warnings
Edited on Wed May-05-04 06:55 PM by Ardee
But that was not the issue we were discussing now was it?

One might make an excellent case for Bush incompetency or even collusion (taking advantage of a potential threat to further his agendas). But as did Clinton before him, there is no reason to expect that Gore would have handled the terrorist threat with any greater degree of competency or vision than did Mr. Clinton.

I only post here because I am more than a bit tired of the penchant of many here to make things so black and white and cartoonish in nature.Bush is not the anti christ (that would be Nader of course) nor is Gore the savior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. Not pi**ed off the whole world with arrogance!
The Shrub has been busy making enemies since he took office. Right now I can only think of a few.....

disregarded the Kyoto accords
Named axis of evil countries


None of that is Gore's style. I don't know if he could have prevented 9/11 but I know he would have paid more attention to the warnings from Clarke and Mueller. Maybe that would have been enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. He'd have heeded the advice of Gary Hart & Warren Rudman,
re their findings on the threat of terrorism
Heck, Gore COMMISSIONED them to do this.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. He was acutely aware of terrorism.
Following his own Gore Commission on airline security and being #2 in an administration that considered al Qaeda the country's biggest security threat by the time it left in January 2001, one can assume that when intelligence traffic went wild GLOBALLY in summer 2001 Al Gore would have called for battle stations and shaken loose the intel about the flight schools, the two terrorists in San Diego, and Moussaoui. Put that together with the warnings from Genoa and other clues and a worst-case scenario emerges upon which to issue severe warnings to the airlines AT LEAST. There was also the distinct possibility that the San Diego and flight school guys may have had some explicit plans or more clues in with their personal belongings that would have led directly to the plot. Or the simple fact that they were arrested and questioned may have scared bin Laden enough to call it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Well since the PNAC did it and they wouldn't have been in power......
it wouldn't have happened. He wouldn't have to prevent it because he wouldn't have created it. Quite simple really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gingergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. Gore said he would have had more than FBI agents
working counterterrorism than Ashcroft did. Ashcroft had the FBI out trying to arrest prostitutes in New Orleans!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC