Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Senator had the best questions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:34 PM
Original message
Which Senator had the best questions?
I missed a good chunk of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. McCain's were good, Levin? - sev kept saying 'just answer the question'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. My top 3
1) Graham (R)
2) McCain (R)
3) Clinton (D)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I agree
I was very pleased with Graham, I have to say. And did you notice him get up and leave when Liddy was kissing Bush's ass? It would really be nice if the man has some morals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not sure
I didn't hear it all, either. However, McCain would have to be on the good side of the ledger. He sure rattled the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. sad that none of our dems stepped up to the plate
at least not forcefully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton, Dayton, McCain
I'm sure I missed a few, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. They get my vote, too.
I was so happy with Dayton that I phoned his office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He was awesome.
I wasn't aware of him before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. what's with such a short time - 5 min for question and answer
way too many asking questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Levin then McCain followed by Kennedy. Here's Levin's statement:
....

General Taguba’s finding that “personnel assigned to the 372nd MP company...were directed to change facility procedures to ‘set the conditions’ for M(ilitary) I(ntelligence) interrogations” is bolstered by pictures that suggest the sadistic abuse is part of an organized and conscious process of intelligence gathering. In other words, these abusive actions do not appear to be aberrant conduct by individuals, but part of a conscious method of extracting information. If true, the planners of this process are at least as guilty as those who carried out the abuses.

The President’s Legal Counsel, Alberto Gonzales, reportedly wrote in a memorandum that the decision to avoid invoking the Geneva Conventions "preserves flexibility" in the war on terrorism. Belittling or ignoring the Geneva Conventions invites our enemies to do the same, and increases the danger to our military servicemen and women. It also sends a disturbing message to the world that America does not feel bound by internationally accepted standards of conduct.

The findings of General Taguba’s report as reported on a public website raise a number of disturbing issues. For example:


How far up the chain of command was there implicit or explicit direction or approval or knowledge of this prisoner abuse?

Why was a Joint Interrogation and Detention Facility at Abu Ghraib established in a way which led to the subordination of the military police brigade to the military intelligence unit conducting interrogation activities?

What was the role played by military intelligence, the CIA, and any other intelligence units in requesting or suggesting abusive activities?

How is it in our nation's interest to have civilian contractors, rather than military personnel, performing vital national security functions, such as prisoner interrogations, in a war zone? When soldiers break the law or fail to follow orders, commanders can hold them accountable for their misconduct. Military commanders don't have the same authority over civilian contractors.

....


http://levin.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=221240
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I hope to God this brings an end to using contractors in a war zone
What a dangerous and expensive practice. They have been responsible for most of the egregious fuckups in this cursed "adventure." If the armed forces can't do their jobs without contractors then there is something HORRIBLY WRONG with the structure. That must be fixed.

WHERE IS THE MISSING $4 Trillion, Pentagon? did that go missing because of "contractors" (i.e., corporations) too?

How can we end this hellish domination of corporations over every aspect of our lives???? They screw everything up!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuffragetteSal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. So why are we there?
I don't who asked it but said something like...so there are no WMD and we have the bad guy now what? Peace building? How can that be (that is me asking).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It was a woman
I didn't get her name, but she was from Guam. Her questions about the war were very pointed, and Rummy didn't like them at all. He got all high pitched and whiny. Anyone get her name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuffragetteSal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo
Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo
http://www.house.gov/bordallo/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC