|
Edited on Sun May-09-04 09:07 PM by wuushew
A passage covered with black ink in a document recently diffused by the White House was reconstituted. The method could be applied to considerable déclassifiées files. It "was bored" in front of television, the weekend of Easter, "when the memo of the CIA with George Bush was diffused", remembers David Naccache, specialist in the coding of the data of the French company Gemplus. "I telephoned at once Claire Whelan, a coed of Dublin City University, from which I direct the thesis, to propose to him to attack the caviardés passages", it tells. Mission accomplished, or almost.
The "memo" in question, addressed on August 6, 2001 by the CIA to president Bush and entitled "Ben Laden determined to strike in the USA", had been just déclassifié by the White House. This one wanted to prove that the precision of the warnings of the services of information was not sufficient to make it possible to the president to prevent the attacks of September 11. But five passages specifying the sources of the collected information had been covered with black ink. For the cryptologist David Naccache, these illegible fragments were as many red rags. The result of its efforts - "conduits on a purely deprived basis", specifies it, concerned not to imply its employer in his initiative - was presented Tuesday May 4 at the time of the conference Eurocrypt 2004 which joined together until May 6 with Interlaken, in Switzerland, the gratin of world cryptography. "the demonstration was extremely impressive", judge Jean-Jacques Quisquater (university of Leuwen-the-New), specialist in the field, which greets this company of "reverse engineering of censured document".
David Naccache and his pupil indeed succeeded in discovering one of the censured words. The term "Egyptian" seems the only possible one to them. They want to polish their method before returning their verdict on a longer passage, in order not to discredit it. And they straightforwardly threw sponge for a completely isolated word, for lack of sufficient indices.
Technology employed does not have, at first sight, anything revolutionist. The two researchers initially "rectified" the text, deformed at the time of its digitalization - the slope was only of 0,52°. They then used a software of character recognition to determine the police force of the text which fixes the number of signs per unit of length.
The simple recourse to an English dictionary then makes it possible to draw up a list of possible words. "1 530 corresponded", indicates David Naccache. But the article "year" preceding the word mystery implied that this one necessarily started with a vowel, which made it possible to bring back the list to 346 words. In French, an index provided by articles like "one" or "one", in the same way, would have made it possible to tighten research. The selection was also facilitated by the fact that the bill of character, Arial, is "proportional", i.e. the "hunting" of the letters varies.
The space occupied by an I differs from that taken by W, which can give additional indices, compared to the police forces known as "monospace", like the Mail, often used, where all the letters are worth. "Among" the surviving "words, five or six could make direction, but only Egyptian corresponded to the context", indicates the cryptologist. This last stage raises more human intelligence than of the geometry of the text. To choose among Ukrainian, univited, unofficial, incursive, Egyptian, indebted and Ugandan, the two researchers were based on their good direction, Uganda and the Ukraine seeming too far away from the theatre of the operations to be retained, for example. No doubt the analysis of the "memo" of the CIA reveals only one "an open secret", recognizes David Naccache. But the method systematizes research.
In another "memo", it revealed that civil helicopters militarized by the Iraqis had been bought in Korea South And nothing is opposed to the automated application of this technique to the whole of the déclassifiés documents, in which it could put at the day "of the isolated words, even of the groups of two or three words". Opinion with the critics...
|