Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*, you have set the stage....now you must stand on it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:23 PM
Original message
*, you have set the stage....now you must stand on it
This is an excerpt from a Statement by the President, dated June 26, 2003.

Link: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030626-3.html

"Freedom from torture is an inalienable human right. The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, ratified by the United States and more than 130 other countries since 1984, forbids governments from deliberately inflicting severe physical or mental pain or suffering on those within their custody or control. Yet torture continues to be practiced around the world by rogue regimes whose cruel methods match their determination to crush the human spirit. Beating, burning, rape, and electric shock are some of the grisly tools such regimes use to terrorize their own citizens. These despicable crimes cannot be tolerated by a world committed to justice."

"The United States is committed to the world-wide elimination of torture and we are leading this fight by example. I call on all governments to join with the United States and the community of law-abiding nations in prohibiting, investigating, and prosecuting all acts of torture and in undertaking to prevent other cruel and unusual punishment."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's the problem?
He said June 26, 2003 that "torture continues to be practiced around the world." And he was proven correct! So "get off his back."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He also said this
"The United States is committed to the world-wide elimination of torture and we are leading this fight by example.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't know if there's another discussion for this, but
Who here thinks that Bush really mightnot have known about this? I'll bet that even rumsfeld might not have known...watching that testimony, it seemed like nobody knew what was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. only to the extent that
he knows nothing about anything that goes on. But, considering that they were all TOLD in January what was happening, ignorance is not a defense in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I've said it before
and I'll say it again. Rumsfeld gets reports from the field constantly. He is a "detail" man. Rumsfeld in turn reports to Bush at least weekly. There was a news item in a January CBS news report about the investigation into the abuse. Myers knew and reported it to Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld knew and reported it to Bush, so Bush knew. That is a given.
The problem for them is the pictures. When the pictures and Taguba report were leaked to the media, the jig was up. They all knew from at least January to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They turned a blind eye
Read Hersh's article in the New Yorker. A desperate hope for good news, while ignoring the bad. They simply refused to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Would you be so kind to add a link please
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not me.
No Good Defense
By Evan Thomas
Newsweek

May 17 issue - Donald Rumsfeld likes to be in total control. He wants to know all the details, including the precise interrogation techniques used on enemy prisoners. Since 9/11 he has insisted on personally signing off on the harsher methods used to squeeze suspected terrorists held at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The conservative hard-liners at the Department of Justice have given the secretary of Defense a lot of leeway. It does not violate the spirit of the Geneva Conventions, the lawyers have told Rumsfeld, to put prisoners in ever-more-painful "stress positions" or keep them standing for hours on end, to deprive them of sleep or strip them naked. According to one of Rumsfeld's aides, the secretary has drawn the line at interrogating prisoners for more than 24 hours at a time or depriving them of light.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4934213

rummy knew and according to General Peter Pace, bush knew too - last January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oh, Really?
It does not violate the spirit of the Geneva Conventions, the lawyers have told Rumsfeld, to put prisoners in ever-more-painful "stress positions" or keep them standing for hours on end, to deprive them of sleep or strip them naked.

---------

I THOUGHT that the Geneva Conventions were put in place to prevent this sort of 'random opining' by the lawyers'. The Geneva Conventions were/are vitally important because they DO SET the standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pssh
"I will not engage in so-called nation building"
"I will have a humble foreign policy"

When has he EVER had to live up to anything he's said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC